Relicensing Fort St. Vrain: How the HTGR Design Basis Was Rediscovered

Author(s):  
J. K. August ◽  
J. J. Hunter

Over its 1968–1988 life, PSCo relicensed the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) High-temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) for light water reactor (LWR) technology requirements. Estimates of the financial losses associated with the plant range from $500 million to $2 billion in 1980 dollars. Colorado ratepayers, the shareholders of Gulf General Atomics and its corporate successors — General Atomics, GA Technologies or just GA and Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) bore these losses. Two critical plant issues required solution for the plant’s economic success — (1) the high-cost of 93% enriched uranium fuel and (2) low unit availability. While fuel costs were beyond utility control, low availability was controllable, yet remained unresolved. Commercially isolated for twenty years, PSCo shut the plant down in 1988. Economic success of future HTGRs depends upon avoiding similar complications. This paper examines the issues that made FSV uneconomic, including those fundamental to HTGR technology and others attributable to the utility operator and its culture. Knowing the history of FSV and HTGR design, designers should anticipate reasonable challenges. Preparations will help manage future HTGR risks, costs, and assure operating success. Regulators and industry can assure more effective, economic operations in the next round of HTGR designs.

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
William Beaver

The nation’s nuclear power industry is in trouble. The number of operating reactors continues to decline, while only one new plant is scheduled to open and it is well behind schedule and 50% over budget. The article will investigate the possibility of a nuclear revival in this country by first analyzing the troubled history of the light water reactor, a technology that dates back to the 1950s, and one the federal government choose to pursue to ensure America’s technological leadership, and one the nuclear manufactures heavily promoted to ensure profitability. All of this resulted in a rush to nuclear power in the 1960s, but abruptly ended a little more than a decade later, due largely to the exorbitant costs of constructing a nuclear plant. The article then discusses the chances of a nuclear comeback, focusing on new reactor designs, which are less complex and cheaper to construct but will be dependent upon how seriously global warming is viewed by the public and elected officials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document