Implementation of CSA Z662-15 Annex K Option 2 on a 610mm Liquid Pipeline

Author(s):  
Rory Belanger ◽  
Derrick Sarafinchan

For more than two decades, CSA Z662 Annex K has provided a method for developing alternative acceptance criteria for weld flaws in mechanized welded pipelines. Increasingly, over the years, fracture mechanics practitioners have found the method overly conservative and restrictive with respect to brittle fracture criteria when compared to other accepted fracture mechanics-based engineering critical assessment ECA codes and methods. These limitations rendered the CSA Annex K method difficult to implement on pipelines constructed with materials not possessing optimal toughness and in cases requiring consideration of fracture toughness at temperatures lower than the typical minimum design metal temperature (MDMT) of −5°C. This paper presents experiences implementing CSA Z662-15 Annex K Option 2 methodology on a 610 mm diameter liquids pipeline and compares and contrasts the utility and benefits of the code revision. This pipeline required consideration for installation during winter months, necessitating installation temperatures as low as −30°C. In addition to evaluation of actual ECA results, analytical evaluations of the Option 2 methodology were also conducted considering parameters outside those used on the project. The new Annex K Option 2 method was found to be of considerable benefit in preparation of a practical ECA. Since fracture toughness testing was conducted at the anticipated lowest installation temperature, the flaw criteria were, as expected, principally controlled by elastic/plastic crack growth consideration. The failure assessment diagram implemented into the CSA Z662-15 Annex K Option 2 provided tolerance for both longer and deeper flaws than that afforded by Option 1 (which resorts to the former 2011 Annex K method). Furthermore, the reduced restriction to the surface interaction ligament (p distance) offers additional advantages including increased flexibility in weld profile design and weld pass sequencing. Fracture toughness (CTOD) testing of TMP pipeline steels used in the project at −30°C often produced transitional fracture toughness results. It was found that the particular project materials were quite sensitive to the level of test specimen pre-compression (an acceptable plastic straining method to reduce residual stress gradients) applied to the CTOD specimens to enhance fatigue crack-front straightness. It was found that optimizing the level of pre-compression (to achieve acceptable pre-crack straightness while minimizing plastic pre-strain) achieved a balance between fully satisfying testing requirements, providing a conservative assessment of CTOD, and facilitating a functional Annex K ECA.


Author(s):  
R. S. Kulka

During fracture toughness testing of SEN(B) specimens, an important assumption is that the test specimen is highly constrained. This assumption is ensured by the testing of a deeply cracked specimen, with in-plane and out-of-plane dimensions that are sufficient to guarantee an appropriate level of crack tip stress triaxiality. This condition guarantees that high-constraint fracture toughness values are derived, conservative for use in standard fracture mechanics assessments. In reality, many components have small in-plane or out-of-plane dimensions. It is considered that this could cause a reduction in crack tip constraint of a sufficient amount to increase the effective fracture toughness of the components. However, there is currently limited understanding as to the magnitude of the benefits that could be claimed. Finite element analysis of various thin-width SEN(B) specimens has been undertaken. The knowledge gained can be used to develop fracture mechanics methodology for the testing of thin-width specimens and the subsequent derivation of appropriate toughness values.



Author(s):  
Sergio Limon ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Mike Barnum ◽  
Robert Pilarczyk

The fracture process of energy pipelines can be described in terms of fracture initiation, stable fracture propagation and final fracture or fracture arrest. Each of these stages, and the final fracture mode (leak or rupture), are directly impacted by the tendency towards brittle or ductile behavior that line pipe steels have the capacity to exhibit. Vintage and modern low carbon steels, such as those used to manufacture energy pipelines, exhibit a temperature-dependent transition from ductile-to-brittle behavior that affects the fracture behavior. There are numerous definitions of fracture toughness in common usage, depending on the stage of the fracture process and the behavior or fracture mode being evaluated. The most commonly used definitions in engineering fracture analysis of pipelines with cracks or long-seam weld defects are related to fracture initiation, stable propagation or final fracture. When choosing fracture toughness test data for use in engineering Fracture Mechanics-based assessments of energy pipelines, it is important to identify the stage of the fracture process and the expected fracture behavior in order to appropriately select test data that represent equivalent conditions. A mismatch between the physical fracture event being modeled and the chosen experimental fracture toughness data can result in unreliable predictions or overly conservative results. This paper presents a description of the physical fracture process, behavior and failure modes that pipelines commonly exhibit as they relate to fracture toughness testing, and their implications when evaluating cracks and cracks-like features in pipelines. Because pipeline operators, and practitioners of engineering Fracture Mechanics analyses, are often faced with the challenge of only having Charpy fracture toughness available, this paper also presents a review of the various correlations of Charpy toughness data to fracture toughness data expressed in terms of KIC or JIC. Considerations with the selection of an appropriate correlation for determining the failure pressure of pipelines in the presence of cracks and long-seam weld anomalies will be discussed.



2016 ◽  
Vol 821 ◽  
pp. 464-470
Author(s):  
Ľubomír Gajdoš ◽  
Martin Šperl

For standard fracture mechanical tests flat specimens (principally CT or SENB) are required. When investigating fracture mechanical properties of thin – walled pipes this brings about a problem because it is necessary to straighten pipe bands. However, this operation causes internal stresses to be induced not only in the semi-product subjected to straightening but also in finished specimens. A question therefore arises to what extent are then the magnitudes of the fracture toughness determined representative for the actual cylindrical wall. To solve this problem fracture mechanics tests were caried out on flat (straightened) CT specimens as well as on curved CT specimens with the natural curvature. The R – curves as well as the resulting parameters of the fracture toughness, obtained for both types of CT specimens, were compared and it was concluded that the fracture toughness of the pipe material determined on straightened CT specimens was practically the same as that obtained on curved CT specimens.



Author(s):  
David W. Beardsmore ◽  
Karen Stone ◽  
Huaguo Teng

Deterministic Fracture Mechanics (DFM) assessments of structural components (e.g. pressure vessels and piping used in the nuclear industry) containing defects can usually be carried out using the R6 procedure. The aim of such an assessment is to demonstrate that there are sufficient safety margins on the applied loads, defect size and fracture toughness for the safe continual operation of the component. To ensure a conservative assessment is made, a lower-bound fracture toughness, and upper-bound defect sizes and applied loads are used. In some cases, this approach will be too conservative and will provide insufficient safety margins. Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics (PFM) allow a way forward in such cases by allowing for the inherent scatter in material properties, defect size and applied loads explicitly. Basic Monte Carlo Methods (MCM) allow an estimate of the probability of failure to be calculated by carrying out a large number of fracture mechanics assessments, each using a random sample of the different random variables (loads, defect size, fracture toughness etc). The probability of failure is obtained by counting the proportion of simulations which lead to assessment points that lie outside the R6 failure assessment curve. This approach can give good results for probabilities greater than 10−5. However, for smaller probabilities, the calculation may be inefficient and a very large number of assessments may be necessary to obtain an accurate result, which may be prohibitive. Engineering Reliability Methods (ERM), such as the First Order Reliability method (FORM) and the Second Order Reliability Method (SORM), can be used to estimate the probability of failure in such cases, but these methods can be difficult to implement, do not always give the correct result, and are not always robust enough for general use. Advanced Monte Carlo Methods (AMCM) combine the two approaches to provide an accurate and efficient calculation of probability of failure in all cases. These methods aim to carry out Importance Sampling so that only assessment points that lie close to or outside the failure assessment curve are calculated. Two methods are described in this paper: (1) orthogonal sampling, and (2) spherical sampling. The power behind these methods is demonstrated by carrying out calculations of probability of failure for semi-elliptical, surface breaking, circumferential cracks in the inside of a pressure vessel. The results are compared with the results of Basic Monte Carlo and Engineering Reliability calculations. The calculations use the R6 assessment procedure.



2016 ◽  
Vol 879 ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
Fumiyoshi Minami ◽  
Mitsuru Ohata ◽  
Yasuhito Takashima

As the result of the international standardization work in Japanese IST project, ISO 27306 were published in 2009 for correction of CTOD fracture toughness for constraint loss in steel components. ISO 27306 employs an equivalent CTOD ratio based on the Weibull stress criterion, which leads to more accurate fracture assessment than the conventional fracture mechanics assessment. On the occasion of the 1st periodical review, the revision of ISO 27306 has been proposed from Japan. This paper describes the key contents of the new ISO 27306. A case study is included on the fracture assessment of a wide plate component according to FAD (failure assessment diagram) approach specified in BS 7910:2013.





Metals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 749
Author(s):  
Andrej Likeb ◽  
Nenad Gubeljak

To estimate the acceptable size of cracks and predict the loading limit of the pipeline or its resistance to the initiation and crack growth by following the structural integrity, the fracture toughness and limit load solutions are required. Standard fracture toughness testing of thin-walled pipelines is often difficult to perform in order to complete standard requirements. To find an alternative technique for the measurement of the fracture toughness of the already delivered pipeline segment, the new pipe-ring specimen has been proposed; however, the limit load solutions have not been investigated yet. The limit load depends on the geometry of the specimen and loading mode. The ligament yielding of pipe-ring specimens containing axial cracks through the thickness under combined loads was calculated by the finite element method. This paper provides limit load solutions of several different pipe-ring geometries containing two diametric symmetrical cracks with the same depth ratio in a range of 0.45 ≤ a/W ≤ 0.55. The limit load (LL) solutions calculated by numerical analysis are shown as a function of the full ring section’s size and the corresponding crack aspect ratio for determining the normalized load. These can potentially construct the failure assessment diagram to estimate the crack acceptance in a part of the pipe.



Author(s):  
Henryk G. Pisarski ◽  
Ruth Hammond ◽  
Keith Watt

The occurrence of pop-in on the test record of fracture toughness tests and appearance of splits on the fracture surface, coupled with failure to meet Charpy toughness requirements, raised doubts about the fracture integrity of a parent pipe to API 5L X65 for low temperature operation. The cause of pop-in was investigated using fractographic and metallographic methods and additional fracture mechanics testing was conducted using different notch orientations. In addition, fitness-for-service was assessed using a fracture mechanics assessment procedure. It is shown that for typical flaw orientations that might be present, the apparent fracture toughness at pop-in is not representative. Nevertheless, it is shown that for the stress levels considered, the pipeline is tolerant to flaws without risk of fracture initiation at low temperature.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document