Ray tracing based simulation of stray light effect for geostationary ocean color imager

Author(s):  
Eunsong Oh ◽  
Jinsuk Hong ◽  
Sug-Whan Kim ◽  
Seongick Cho ◽  
Joo-Hyung Ryu
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 327-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Moeini ◽  
Zahra Vaziri Zanjani ◽  
C. Thomas McElroy ◽  
David W. Tarasick ◽  
Robert D. Evans ◽  
...  

Abstract. Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers are the primary, standard instruments for ground-based ozone measurements under the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Global Atmosphere Watch program. The accuracy of the data retrieval for both instruments depends on a knowledge of the ozone absorption coefficients and some assumptions underlying the data analysis. Instrumental stray light causes nonlinearity in the response of both the Brewer and Dobson to ozone at large ozone slant paths. In addition, it affects the effective ozone absorption coefficients and extraterrestrial constants that are both instrument-dependent. This effect has not been taken into account in the calculation of ozone absorption coefficients that are currently recommended by WMO for the Dobson network. The ozone absorption coefficients are calculated for each Brewer instrument individually, but in the current procedure the effect of stray light is not considered. This study documents the error caused by the effect of stray light in the Brewer and Dobson total ozone measurements using a physical model for each instrument. For the first time, new ozone absorption coefficients are calculated for the Brewer and Dobson instruments, taking into account the stray light effect. The analyses show that the differences detected between the total ozone amounts deduced from Dobson AD and CD pair wavelengths are related to the level of stray light within the instrument. The discrepancy introduced by the assumption of a fixed height for the ozone layer for ozone measurements at high latitude sites is also evaluated. The ozone data collected by two Dobson instruments during the period of December 2008 to December 2014 are compared with ozone data from a collocated double monochromator Brewer spectrophotometer (Mark III). The results illustrate the dependence of Dobson AD and CD pair measurements on stray light.


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 837-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kajita ◽  
E. Veshchev ◽  
R. Barnsley ◽  
M. Walsh

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 10232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunsong Oh ◽  
Jinsuk Hong ◽  
Sug-Whan Kim ◽  
Young-Je Park ◽  
Seong-Ick Cho

2011 ◽  
Vol 138-139 ◽  
pp. 387-390
Author(s):  
Jin Xing Niu ◽  
Heng Can Li

Analysis and calculation of stray light is important to improve the performance of infrared detection system. In this article, we mainly discussed two sources: earth and atmosphere emission and thermal stray radiation. A method based on Monte Carlo ray-tracing in TracePro is proposed to calculate the irradiance of detector arisen from earth and atmosphere emission. The thermal stray light irradiance on detector can also be obtained by simulation in TracePro.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Vabson ◽  
Joel Kuusk ◽  
Ilmar Ansko ◽  
Riho Vendt ◽  
Krista Alikas ◽  
...  

An intercomparison of radiance and irradiance ocean color radiometers (the second laboratory comparison exercise—LCE-2) was organized within the frame of the European Space Agency funded project Fiducial Reference Measurements for Satellite Ocean Color (FRM4SOC) May 8–13, 2017 at Tartu Observatory, Estonia. LCE-2 consisted of three sub-tasks: (1) SI-traceable radiometric calibration of all the participating radiance and irradiance radiometers at the Tartu Observatory just before the comparisons; (2) indoor, laboratory intercomparison using stable radiance and irradiance sources in a controlled environment; (3) outdoor, field intercomparison of natural radiation sources over a natural water surface. The aim of the experiment was to provide a link in the chain of traceability from field measurements of water reflectance to the uniform SI-traceable calibration, and after calibration to verify whether different instruments measuring the same object provide results consistent within the expected uncertainty limits. This paper describes the third phase of LCE-2: The results of the field experiment. The calibration of radiometers and laboratory comparison experiment are presented in a related paper of the same journal issue. Compared to the laboratory comparison, the field intercomparison has demonstrated substantially larger variability between freshly calibrated sensors, because the targets and environmental conditions during radiometric calibration were different, both spectrally and spatially. Major differences were found for radiance sensors measuring a sunlit water target at viewing zenith angle of 139° because of the different fields of view. Major differences were found for irradiance sensors because of imperfect cosine response of diffusers. Variability between individual radiometers did depend significantly also on the type of the sensor and on the specific measurement target. Uniform SI traceable radiometric calibration ensuring fairly good consistency for indoor, laboratory measurements is insufficient for outdoor, field measurements, mainly due to the different angular variability of illumination. More stringent specifications and individual testing of radiometers for all relevant systematic effects (temperature, nonlinearity, spectral stray light, etc.) are needed to reduce biases between instruments and better quantify measurement uncertainties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document