scholarly journals AutoLock: a semiautomated system for radiotherapy treatment plan quality control

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Dewhurst ◽  
Matthew Lowe ◽  
Mark J. Hardy ◽  
Christopher J. Boylan ◽  
Philip Whitehurst ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lindsey Appenzoller Olsen

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has become a prominent area of research in radiation oncology in the last five years. The development of KBP aims to address the lack of systematic quality control and plan quality variability in radiotherapy treatment planning by providing achievable, patient-specific optimization objectives derived from a model trained with a cohort of previously treated, site-specific plans. This dissertation intended to develop, evaluate, and implement a knowledge-based planning system to reduce variability and improve radiotherapy treatment plan quality. The project aimed to 1) develop and validate an algorithm to train mathematical models that predict dose-volume histograms for organs at risk in radiotherapy planning, 2) implement the algorithm into a software application in order to transfer the technology into clinical practice, and 3) evaluate the impact of the software system (algorithm + application) on reducing variability and improving radiotherapy treatment plan quality through knowledge transfer. The presented work demonstrates that a KBP model is beneficial to radiotherapy planning. The developed models adequately describe what is dosimetrically achievable for patient specific anatomy and have proven useful in outlier detection for quality control of radiotherapy planning. The KBP paradigm has also demonstrated ability to improve treatment plan quality through benchmarking and transfer of knowledge between institutions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part11) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
T Song ◽  
Z Tian ◽  
X Jia ◽  
L Zhou ◽  
S Jiang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 5497-5505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binbin Wu ◽  
Francesco Ricchetti ◽  
Giuseppe Sanguineti ◽  
Misha Kazhdan ◽  
Patricio Simari ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 703-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Simpson ◽  
Andrea Raith ◽  
Paul Rouse ◽  
Matthias Ehrgott

Purpose The operations research method of data envelopment analysis (DEA) shows promise for assessing radiotherapy treatment plan quality. The purpose of this paper is to consider the technical requirements for using DEA for plan assessment. Design/methodology/approach In total, 41 prostate treatment plans were retrospectively analysed using the DEA method. The authors investigate the impact of DEA weight restrictions with reference to the ability to differentiate plan performance at a level of clinical significance. Patient geometry influences plan quality and the authors compare differing approaches for managing patient geometry within the DEA method. Findings The input-oriented DEA method is the method of choice when performing plan analysis using the key undesirable plan metrics as the DEA inputs. When considering multiple inputs, it is necessary to constrain the DEA input weights in order to identify potential plan improvements at a level of clinical significance. All tested approaches for the consideration of patient geometry yielded consistent results. Research limitations/implications This work is based on prostate plans and individual recommendations would therefore need to be validated for other treatment sites. Notwithstanding, the method that requires both optimised DEA weights according to clinical significance and appropriate accounting for patient geometric factors is universally applicable. Practical implications DEA can potentially be used during treatment plan development to guide the planning process or alternatively used retrospectively for treatment plan quality audit. Social implications DEA is independent of the planning system platform and therefore has the potential to be used for multi-institutional quality audit. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published examination of the optimal approach in the use of DEA for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (21) ◽  
pp. 8213-8227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Song ◽  
David Staub ◽  
Mingli Chen ◽  
Weiguo Lu ◽  
Zhen Tian ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim P. Tol ◽  
Patricia Doornaert ◽  
Birgit I. Witte ◽  
Max Dahele ◽  
Ben J. Slotman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
H. Geng ◽  
T.G. Giaddui ◽  
M. Radden ◽  
N. Lee ◽  
P. Xia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkajyoti Roy ◽  
Reisa Widjaja ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Dan Cutright ◽  
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document