scholarly journals Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter-free stereotactic radiosurgery system

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Y. Cheng ◽  
Holly Ning ◽  
Barbara C. Arora ◽  
Ying Zhuge ◽  
Robert W. Miller
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelino Hermida‐López ◽  
David Sánchez‐Artuñedo ◽  
Miguel Rodríguez ◽  
Lorenzo Brualla

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 5378-5383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immaculada Martínez-Rovira ◽  
Josep Puxeu-Vaqué ◽  
Yolanda Prezado

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part19) ◽  
pp. 2575-2575
Author(s):  
P Rassiah-Szegedi ◽  
S Stathakis ◽  
M Szegedi ◽  
C Esquivel ◽  
N Papanikolaou

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part17) ◽  
pp. 3815-3815
Author(s):  
G Zhang ◽  
K Javedan ◽  
E Moros ◽  
K Latifi ◽  
V Feygelman ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S57 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lind ◽  
T. Knöös ◽  
C. Ceberg ◽  
E. Wieslander ◽  
B. McClean ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Oleg N. Vassiliev ◽  
Christine B. Peterson ◽  
Joe Y. Chang ◽  
Radhe Mohan

Abstract Aim: Previous studies showed that replacing conventional flattened beams (FF) with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams improves the therapeutic ratio in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), but these findings could have been impacted by dose calculation uncertainties caused by the heterogeneity of the thoracic anatomy and by respiratory motion, which were particularly high for target coverage. In this study, we minimised such uncertainties by calculating doses using high-spatial-resolution Monte Carlo and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images. We aimed to evaluate more reliably the benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT. Materials and methods: For a cohort of 15 patients with early-stage lung cancer that we investigated in a previous treatment planning study, we recalculated dose distributions with Monte Carlo using 4DCT images. This included 15 FF and 15 FFF treatment plans. Results: Compared to Monte Carlo, the treatment planning system (TPS) over-predicted doses in low-dose regions of the planning target volume (PTV). For most patients, replacing FF beams with FFF beams improved target coverage, tumour control, and uncomplicated tumour control probabilities. Conclusions: Monte Carlo tends to reveal deficiencies in target coverage compared to coverage predicted by the TPS. Our data support previously reported benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 791-798
Author(s):  
Ahad Ollah Ezzati ◽  
Matthew T. Studenski ◽  
Negin Jamshidi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document