scholarly journals An analysis of acoustic propagation across the East Greenland Frontal Zone

1985 ◽  
Vol 77 (S1) ◽  
pp. S56-S56
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Mellberg ◽  
Donald N. Connors ◽  
Ola M. Johannessen ◽  
David G. Browning ◽  
George Botseas
1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (S1) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Mellberg ◽  
D. N. Connors ◽  
D. G. Browning ◽  
G. Botseas ◽  
O. M. Johannessen

1991 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2144-2156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Mellberg ◽  
Ola M. Johannessen ◽  
Donald N. Connors ◽  
George Botseas ◽  
David G. Browning

1987 ◽  
Vol 92 (C7) ◽  
pp. 6857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Mellberg ◽  
Ola M. Johannessen ◽  
Donald N. Connors ◽  
George Botseas ◽  
David Browning

1985 ◽  
Vol 78 (S1) ◽  
pp. S71-S71
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Mellberg ◽  
Donald N. Connors ◽  
Ola M. Johannessen ◽  
George Botseas ◽  
David Browning

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C9) ◽  
pp. C9-509-C9-511
Author(s):  
P. Doussineau ◽  
W. Schön

1934 ◽  
Vol s5-27 (160) ◽  
pp. 307-309
Author(s):  
C. Schuchert
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-323
Author(s):  
Frank Mobley ◽  
Tiffanie Moore ◽  
Matthew Davis

Author(s):  
Brian Chadwick ◽  
Adam A. Garde ◽  
John Grocott ◽  
Ken J.W. McCaffrey ◽  
Mike A. Hamilton

NOTE: This article was published in a former series of GEUS Bulletin. Please use the original series name when citing this article, for example: Chadwick, B., Garde, A. A., Grocott, J., McCaffrey, K. J., & Hamilton, M. A. (2000). Ketilidian structure and the rapakivi suite between Lindenow Fjord and Kap Farvel, South-East Greenland. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 186, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v186.5215 _______________ The southern tip of Greenland is underlain by the Palaeoproterozoic Ketilidian orogen (e.g. Chadwick & Garde 1996; Garde et al. 1998a). Field investigations in the summer of 1999 were focused on the structure of migmatites (metatexites) and garnetiferous granites (diatexites) of the Pelite Zone in the coastal region of South-East Greenland between Lindenow Fjord and Kap Farvel (Figs 1, 2). Here, we first address the tectonic evolution in the Pelite Zone in that region and its correlation with that in the Psammite Zone further north. Then, the structure and intrusive relationships of the rapakivi suite in the Pelite Zone are discussed, including particular reference to the interpretation of the controversial outcrop on Qernertoq (Figs 2, 8). Studies of the structure of the north-eastern part of the Julianehåb batholith around Qulleq were continued briefly from 1998 but are not addressed here (Fig. 1; Garde et al. 1999). The field study was keyed to an interpretation of the Ketilidian orogen as a whole, including controls of rates of thermal and tectonic processes in convergent settings. Earlier Survey field work (project SUPRASYD, 1992–1996) had as its principal target an evaluation of the economic potential of the orogen (Nielsen et al. 1993). Ensuing plate-tectonic studies were mainly funded in 1997–1998 by Danish research foundations and in 1999 by the Natural Environment Research Council, UK. The five-week programme in 1999 was seriously disrupted by bad weather, common in this part of Greenland, and our objectives were only just achieved. Telestation Prins Christian Sund was the base for our operations (Fig. 2), which were flown with a small helicopter (Hughes MD-500).


Author(s):  
A. Graham Leslie ◽  
Allen P. Nutman

NOTE: This article was published in a former series of GEUS Bulletin. Please use the original series name when citing this article, for example: Leslie, A. G., & Nutman, A. P. (2000). Episodic tectono-thermal activity in the southern part of the East Greenland Caledonides. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 186, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v186.5214 _______________ Isotopic data from the Renland augen granites of the Scoresby Sund region (Figs 1, 2) provided some of the first convincing support for relicts of potentially Grenvillian tectono-thermal activity within the East Greenland Caledonides. In Renland, Chadwick (1975) showed the presence of major bodies of augen granite (Fig. 2) interpreted by Steiger et al. (1979), on the basis of Rb–Sr whole rock and U–Pb zircon age determinations, to have been emplaced about 1000 Ma ago.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document