Impulse and continuous noise reduction of tactical hearing protection systems

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 3529-3529
Author(s):  
Richard McKinley ◽  
Brian Hobbs ◽  
Karl Buck ◽  
Dean Hudson
2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 2026-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura R. Ray ◽  
Jason A. Solbeck ◽  
Alexander D. Streeter ◽  
Robert D. Collier

2004 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 2625-2626
Author(s):  
B. Scott May ◽  
Anthony J. Dietz ◽  
Odile Clavier ◽  
Steve Bilski

2004 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 2378-2379 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Ahroon ◽  
Martin B. Robinette

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Karami ◽  
Mohsen Aliabadi ◽  
Rostam Golmohammadi ◽  
Morteza Hamidi Nahrani

Abstract Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of hearing protection devices (HPDs) on speech intelligibility in Persian work environments. Three current earmuffs and three earplugs and one of the prototypes of molded earplug were tested on 15 male subjects which were randomly selected. The noise reduction of HPDs was measured based on the Real Ear Attenuation at Threshold (REAT) method. Speech intelligibility during using HPDs was determined based on the speech discrimination score (SDS) at two signal to noise (S/N) ratios (0 and + 5). Data were analyzed using SPSS 22. Results The actual to nominal noise reduction rating values were from 47 to 84% for HPDs. At two S/N ratios, no significant differences were observed in speech intelligibility using HPDs (p > 0.05). At S/N ratio = 0, the speech intelligibility descriptively has been only improved by using common earmuffs up to 9.07%. There was a significant difference up to 21.27% in speech intelligibility for proposed molded earplugs at S/N ratio = 0 (p < 0.05). Increasing the HPDs' noise attenuation values led to an increase in speech interference (p < 0.05). The HPDs with the minimum required noise attenuation while maintaining acceptable speech intelligibility should be worn by employees exposed to medium noise levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document