scholarly journals Acoustics modelling of open-cell foam materials from microstructure and constitutive properties

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 2016-2026
Author(s):  
B. P. Semeniuk ◽  
E. Lundberg ◽  
P. Göransson
2021 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 453-464
Author(s):  
Audrey Cabrol ◽  
Antoine Lejeune ◽  
Ronan Lebullenger ◽  
Audrey Denicourt-Nowicki ◽  
Alain Roucoux ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 103818
Author(s):  
Nejc Novak ◽  
Olly Duncan ◽  
Tom Allen ◽  
Andrew Alderson ◽  
Matej Vesenjak ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 06010
Author(s):  
N. Amir ◽  
Mohamed Syakir Mohamed Hisham ◽  
Kamal Ariff Zainal Abidin

Lack of information about the formulation and fabrication process of starch polymer foam and lack of study in the shock absorption ability of starch polymer foam were the reasons this research was executed. In this project starch polymer foam was produced to be used as cushioning material for packaging. Starch polymer foam were developed from starch, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), urea, citric acid, and deionised water. Water amount with drying and curing process were the variables manipulated to produce the best starch polymer foam. It was determined then, that the optimized ratio of starch:PVA:citric acid was 1:1:4. The amount of water used was 10 ml/gram of starch/PVA weight. The suitable foaming mixing was done at a speed of 1500 rpm for 40 minutes. Drying process was done at 70°C for 24 hours, followed by curing process at 100°C for 1 hour to produce closed-cell foam. While for the open-cell foam, the foam was dried and cured at 100ºC for 6 hours. The open-cell and closed-cell foams produced were cut to 6 cm height x 6 cm width x 0.5 cm thick. The average density was calculated and then the foams were subjected to weight drop destructive test. The test was done by placing a foam on top of a piece of mirror, and a weight is dropped onto the foam, with increasing height until the mirror break. Three weights were used with mass of 50 g, 100 g and 200 g. The starch foams were compared to polyurethane and polystyrene foams in terms of the minimum height that can cause the mirror to break. The results showed that starch closed-cell foam absorbed the highest impact energy followed by polystyrene foam, starch open-cell foam and polyurethane foam.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document