Core Practices for Teaching Physical Education: Recommendations for Teacher Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Ward
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Program Planning ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Education Data ◽  
Core Practices ◽  
Pedagogy Literature ◽  
E Mail

Purpose: To identify and define a set of core practices for physical education teacher education (PETE), to situate these practices within existing conceptions of core practices in other subject matters, and to validate the core practices using expert opinion and the evidence-based pedagogy literature. Method: A total of 45 PETE teacher educators, consisting of 22 research experts and 23 faculty members, were purposely selected to establish a consensus on core practices. The procedures draw upon guidelines from evaluation and program planning, medicine, nursing, and health education. Data were collected over e-mail. Results: From an initial set of 18 core practices, 16 practices were further developed and refined by the experts. These 16 practices were further validated by seeking evidence from the physical education literature and by using meta-analytic effect sizes. Discussion/Conclusion: The results of this study can be used as an invitation to the field to improve the authors’ teacher education efforts.

scholarly journals Between ideal teaching and ‘what works’: The transmission and transformation of a content area from university to school placements within physical education teacher education

2020 ◽  
pp. 1356336X2094957
Author(s):  
Björn Tolgfors ◽  
Erik Backman ◽  
Gunn Nyberg ◽  
Mikael Quennerstedt
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Content Area ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
What Works ◽  
Group Interviews

The purpose of this study is to explore the recontextualisation of Assessment for Learning (AfL) as a particular content area in the transition between a university course and a school placement course within Swedish physical education teacher education (PETE). By combining Basil Bernstein’s pedagogic device and Stephen Ball’s performativity perspective, we alternately ask how AfL is constructed as a pedagogic discourse and what AfL becomes in different contexts within PETE. Nine students attending a Swedish PETE programme participated in the study. The empirical material was collected through one seminar and two group interviews at the university, as well as through nine individual interviews based on lesson observations at different school placements. Our findings highlight five recontextualising rules, which indicate that: (1) the task of integrating assessment into teaching enables the use of AfL; (2) an exclusive focus on summative assessment and grading constrains the use of AfL; (3) a lack of critical engagement with physical education teaching traditions constrains the use of AfL; (4) knowing the pupils is crucial for the use of AfL; and (5) the framing of the school placements determines how AfL can be used. As a consequence of these rules, AfL was transformed into three different fabrications: (1) AfL as ideal teaching; (2) AfL as correction of shortcomings; and (3) AfL as ‘what works’. One conclusion from this study is that increased collaboration between teacher educators and cooperating teachers in schools can help strengthen PETE’s influence on school physical education.

Exploring the meaning of movement capability in physical education teacher education through student voices

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunn Nyberg ◽  
Erik Backman ◽  
Håkan Larsson
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Content Knowledge ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education

Scholars argue that movement content knowledge in physical education teacher education (PETE) needs to be revisited and problematised. In this paper we develop the concept of movement capability representing a widened view of movement content knowledge. If teacher educators want to teach movement capability as an intrinsic educational goal in PETE there is an apparent need to consider what to teach, how it is taught and also how movement capability is understood by the learners. The aim of this paper is to analyse how PETE students experience the meaning of movement capability through the teaching in aquatics, dance and ice-skating. This study takes its departure from a number of previous empirical studies investigating the meaning of movement capability. Interviews with seven PETE students, divided into two focus groups, were conducted on three occasions. A phenomenographic analysis shows four qualitatively different ways of experiencing the meaning of movement capability. Major differences that can be seen when comparing the results of a previous study on physical education teachers and students in PETE are the aspect of subjective experiences and the aspect of the observer. In the main, the students do not seem to take into account an observer’s point of view to the same extent as the group of teachers. The results will hopefully contribute to a deeper and more complex understanding of what can be seen as movement capability in PETE and physical education, and thereby enhance development of the teaching and learning of this capability.

The (im)possibilities of praxis in online health and physical education teacher education

2021 ◽  
pp. 1356336X2110164
Author(s):  
Carla Luguetti ◽  
Eimear Enright ◽  
Jack Hynes ◽  
Jeffrey Anthony Bishara
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Teacher Educator ◽  
Lead Author ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Health And Physical Education ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Critical Friend

Over the past three decades, a body of research has highlighted the benefits and challenges of what might collectively be referred to as critical pedagogical approaches to Health and Physical Education Teacher Education (HPETE). This research shows that praxis facilitated through critical pedagogies can challenge dominant accountability regimes in HPETE, by animating the discourse of democracy and interrogating and denaturalizing the conditions of oppression. The aim of this study was to explore the (im)possibilities of praxis when the lead author attempted to transition to online teaching. Theoretically, we are guided by the work of bell hooks, and specifically her ‘engaged pedagogy’. Participatory action research framed this study. Participants included the lead author (a teacher educator), a critical friend, and two additional teacher educators. Data collected included: (a) lead researcher observations; (b) collaborative group meetings between the lead author and the two other teacher educators; (c) meetings between the lead author and the critical friend; (d) teacher educator focus group; and (e) artefacts. Findings are discussed under two themes. First, building relationships as a foundation to cultivating a learning community; this theme relates to the challenges and facilitators to getting to know our ‘faceless students’ and building an interactive relationship with them in an online environment. The second theme constructed from the data was commitment to a process of self-actualization that promotes teachers’ and students’ wellbeing; under this theme we describe and interrogate how mutual participation, vulnerability and risk taking were cultivated in challenging university and pedagogical contexts.

The Possibilities of “Doing” Outdoor and/or Adventure Education in Physical Education/Teacher Education

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Sutherland ◽  
Maureen Legge
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Adventure Education ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Systematic Review Methodology ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education

Background:Physical education has a long association with teaching outdoor and/or adventure education (OAE). As physical education teacher educators, with a special interest in teaching OAE, we wanted to examine perceptions of models based practices in physical education/teacher education.Purpose:This manuscript; explores and critiques a range of national and international perspectives on models based practices in OAE; challenges what stands for teaching OAE in PETE; and offers suggestions for future practice and research. Method: Papers were selected through a systematic review methodology.Data analysis:Using a process of inductive analysis and constant comparison we identified two main themes: Ways of doing this in PE and Ways of doing this in PETE.Discussion/Conclusion:Future recommendations include the pedagogical relevance and importance of understanding the socio-cultural context, the challenge of adventure education being a controlled orchestration and the need to pedagogically change the key of this orchestration, and employing innovative methodological approaches to further explore these issues.

scholarly journals The impact of initial teacher education on understandings of physical education

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Déirdre Ní Chróinín ◽  
Maura Coulter
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Primary Teachers ◽  
Initial Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Education Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Single Question

Evaluation of professional socialisation can provide insight on the impact of Physical Education Teacher Education. A large-scale ( n=326) single question ‘What is PE?’ qualitative methodology was used to access pre-service primary teachers’ understandings of the nature and purpose of physical education . Data analysis involved word frequency queries and coding using a qualitative coding framework based on the dominant discourses of physical education. Trustworthiness of the analysis was addressed using memos, coding checks and peer de-briefing. While responses at the beginning of the programme were dominated by sport and health discourses, an educational discourse grounded in the key messages of the primary physical education curriculum with emphasis on equality of opportunity emerged at the end of the programme. The complexity of addressing understandings in teacher education contexts is highlighted.

scholarly journals Productive Physical Education Pedagogy Scholars: Why They Do It and How

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray F. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Situational Factors ◽  
Mail Questionnaire ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Novice Faculty ◽  
Publication Success

The purpose of this study was to determine why and how a sample of physical education teacher education (PETE) scholars manage to be productive publishers. Authors or coauthors of four or more articles in the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education (JTPE) through the 1980s (N = 24) responded to a mail questionnaire on why they write, why they choose to write for JTPE, what they believe to be true about themselves or their approach to writing, and any situational factors that have led to their publication success. Authors described personal motives such as publishing to meet a curiosity drive, for the enjoyment of the process, to facilitate learning, and to lead toward promotion and raises. Facilitators of the process included having access to colleagues and mentors and having a personal commitment to pursue publication. These findings are discussed with regard to insights available for administrators and novice faculty members.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document