Effective Professional Development for Physical Education Teachers: The Role of Informal, Collaborative Learning

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Armour ◽  
Martin Yelling

This paper reports data from the third phase of a 2-year investigation into continuing professional development (CPD) for physical education teachers in England. The purpose of this phase was to examine the ways in which 10 case study teachers engaged in professional learning over the course of 1 academic year. Data were collected from a series of individual interviews with the teachers, learning diaries, field notes, and a final focus group interview. The findings suggest that these teachers identified CPD as “going on a course,” but, in reality, they learned in a variety of ways. The most striking finding was the high value they placed on learning informally (yet strategically) with and from each other. We argue, therefore, that the traditional relationship between teachers and CPD provision needs to be altered such that teachers in their professional learning communities or networks play a leading role.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-167
Author(s):  
Deborah Tannehill ◽  
Giyasettin Demirhan ◽  
Petra Čaplová ◽  
Züleyha Avsar

This paper reports on an investigation examining provision of physical education continuing professional development (CPD) in European countries undertaken to identify the types of practices being employed. We begin by providing a brief overview of what we currently know about CPD internationally in general education and physical education. Data are reported to reflect Parker and Patton’s (2017) key characteristics of CPD that highlight effective CPD, summarise current trends and issues in physical education, and are intended to serve as a guide to how teachers learn and how they might be better served in that learning in these European countries. Studying current practices in CPD provision identified in this study provided modest insight to inform teacher education programmes and CPD providers on the current status of physical education CPD currently being employed in Europe. We propose these findings might inform international and comparative education with respect to CPD and set the foundation for physical education colleagues in Europe to develop a CPD network where endeavours such as sharing of CPD practices, engaging in discussion of those practices, and the design of collaborative research on such CPD practices are based.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio González López ◽  
David Macías García

The aim of this article is to respond, by means of a nonexperimental empirical study, to the training professional demands of primary education teachers, who understand that their professional undertaking must be fully inclusive of all student profiles. By means of a scaled assessment questionnaire, this article describes the training needs of a representative and standardized group of teachers in the Spanish city of Cordoba. Additionally, through the application of factor analysis, it channels these demands into training modules that should guide specific teaching activities in the future. The principal components extracted understand continuing professional development through five spheres of actions: the teaching of physical education, education and teaching tools, working strategies in the classroom, teaching abilities, and information communication technologies resources. These basic training lines pursue the triple goal of ensuring the professional development of teachers, promoting academic success among all students, and fostering quality teaching.


2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Kloeppel ◽  
Pamela Hodges Kulinna ◽  
Michalis Stylianou ◽  
Hans van der Mars

This study addressed teachers’ fidelity to one Physical Education curricular model. The theoretical framework guiding this study included professional development and fidelity to curricular models. In this study, teachers’ fidelity to the Dynamic Physical Education (DPE) curricular model was measured for high and nonsupport district groups. Participants were 20 Physical Education teachers. Ten teachers worked in a highly supportive district, while 10 teachers worked in nonsupportive districts. Data were collected using field notes, a DPE observation instrument, and informal interviews. Two themes emerged from the data: (a) district support led to higher teacher fidelity levels to the DPE curriculum, and (b) the teachers from the nonsupport district implemented management procedures differently than the high support district teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document