“Dead but Standing Erect”: Why Southern Conference Members Left to Form the Southeastern Conference

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Jim Watkins

Thirteen institutions left the Southern Conference to form the Southeastern Conference during 1932. Why did these schools leave the Southern Conference? Previous historical research portrays the large size of the Southern Conference and the desire to pass academic reforms as reasons for the Southeastern Conference’s formation. This article argues that the university presidents and other administrators at Southeastern Conference institutions formed it to enhance the legitimacy of their member institutions. Throughout the Great Depression, the conference’s administrators pursued increased legitimacy by attempting to reform academic eligibility rules, allowing football games to be broadcast over the radio, awarding athletic scholarships, allowing member institutions to compete in emerging postseason football bowl games, and hiring a commissioner. This instance of conference realignment is historically significant because some of the policies implemented by the Southeastern Conference contributed to its rise as one of the top revenue-generating conferences in college athletics.

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 540-541

Matthew Jaremski of Colgate University reviews “The Great Depression of the 1930s: Lessons for Today”, by Nicholas Crafts and Peter Fearon. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Fourteen papers present an introduction to the Great Depression as it affected the advanced countries in the 1930s. Papers discuss depression and recovery in the 1930s—an overview; the 1930s—understanding the lessons; Europe's Great Depression—coordination failure after the First World War; reparations, deficits, and debt default—the Great Depression in Germany; disintegration of the international economy between the wars; the political lessons of Depression-era banking reform; the banking panics in the United States in the 1930s—some lessons for today; can contractionary fiscal policy be expansionary?— consolidation, sustainability, and fiscal policy impact in Britain in the 1930s; U.S. monetary and fiscal policy in the 1930s; what was new about the New Deal?; labor markets in recession and recovery—the United Kingdom and the United States in the 1920s and 1930s; economic growth and recovery in the United States—1919–41; ““blood and treasure''—exiting the Great Depression and lessons for today; and fetters of gold and paper. Crafts is Professor of Economic History and Director of the Economic and Social Research Council Research Centre, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy, at the University of Warwick. Fearon is Emeritus Professor of Modern Economic History at the University of Leicester.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document