Synthetic Fuel Technology Development in the United States. A Retrospective Assessment. Michael Crow, Barry Bozeman, Walter Meyer, and Ralph Shangraw, Jr. Praeger, Westport, CT, 1988. xiv, 175 pp. $39.95

Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 247 (4950) ◽  
pp. 1593-1594
Author(s):  
P. J. T. Morris
1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Anthony N. Stranges ◽  
Michael Crow ◽  
Barry Bozeman ◽  
Walter Meyer ◽  
Ralph Shangraw

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Ruebner

This retrospective assessment argues that despite the arrival in office in 2009 of a president who articulated the case for Palestinian rights more strongly and eloquently than any of his predecessors, U.S. official policy in the Obama years skewed heavily in favor of Israel. While a negotiated two-state resolution of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians continued to be the formal goal of the United States, Israel's defiant refusal to stop settlement expansion, the administration's determined actions to perpetuate Israeli impunity in international fora, as well as the U.S. taxpayer's hefty subsidy of the Israeli military machine all ensured that no progress could be made on that score. The author predicts that with all hopes of a negotiated two-state solution now shattered, Obama's successor will have to contend with an entirely new paradigm, thanks in no small part to the gathering momentum of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.


1984 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Tarr ◽  
James McCurley III ◽  
Francis C. McMichael ◽  
Terry Yosie

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 6-17
Author(s):  
Caroline Rizza ◽  
Paula Curvelo ◽  
Inês Crespo ◽  
Michel Chiaramello ◽  
Alessia Ghezzi ◽  
...  

The introduction of information technology (IT) in the society and its pervasiveness in every aspect of citizens’ daily life highlight societal stakes related to the goals regarding the uses IT, such as social networks. This paper examines two cases that lack a straightforward link with privacy as addressed and protected by existing law in Europe (EU) and the United-States (USA), but whose characteristics, we believe fall on other privacy function and properties. In Western societies, individuals rely on normative discourses, such as the legal one, in order to ensure protection. Hence, the paper argues that other functions of privacy need either further framing into legislation or they need to constitute in themselves normative commitments of an ethical nature for technology development and use. Some initiatives at the EU level recall such commitments, namely by developing a normative discourse based on ethics and human values. We argue that we need to interrogate society about those normative discourses because the values we once cherished in a non-digital society are seriously being questioned.


2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubin Patterson

AbstractMore science and technology talented nationals emigrate to the United States from a few Asian countries, by far, than from all of Africa, yet only the latter suffers a "brain drain" whereas the former group experiences net gains as a result of "brain circulation." Brain drain is the one-way flow of talent out of countries where it is most needed in absolute terms (south) to locations where it is most needed in productive terms (the West). The paper finds that, unlike African nations, a number of Asian nations have a brain circulation or technical talent continuously cycling out of the homeland into the United States where the talent is amplified and wealth is generated as the homeland state encourages redirection of some of each to the homeland economy. In these instances, the homeland state and the US-based diaspora work collaboratively in the interest of both. African nations experience little of this brain circulation, partially as a result of weak diaspora—homeland collaborative development agendas. The principal proposition clarified in this comparative analytic project is that developing nations with ongoing collaborative technology development agendas between the homeland state and its US-based diaspora have a huge comparative advantage over those developing nations that do not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document