Psychological Risk Assessment

Science ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 251 (5001) ◽  
pp. 1566-1566
Author(s):  
David P. Hamilton
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Berardelli ◽  
Elena Rogante ◽  
Salvatore Sarubbi ◽  
Denise Erbuto ◽  
David Lester ◽  
...  

Suicide is a cause of early mortality in nearly 5% of patients with schizophrenia, and 25–50% of patients with schizophrenia attempt suicide in their lifetime. Evidence points to numerous individual, clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for suicide in patients with schizophrenia. Although recognizing suicidal risk factors in schizophrenia is extremely important in suicidal risk assessment, we have recently witnessed a change in suicide risk management that shifts the focus from suicide risk assessment to suicide risk formulation. Suicide risk formulation is dependent on the data gathered in the suicide risk assessment and assigns a level of suicide risk that is indispensable for the choice of treatment and the management of patients with a high suicidal risk. In this article, we extend the suicide risk formulation model to patients with schizophrenia. Suicide risk formulation results from four different areas that help clinicians collect as much information as possible for the management of suicidal risk. The four distinct judgments comprise risk status (the risk relating to the specific group to which the patient belongs), risk state (the risk for the person compared with his baseline or another reference point in the course of his life), available resources (on whom the person can count during a crisis) and foreseeable events (which can exacerbate the crisis). In schizophrenia, the suicide risk formulation model allows the clinician to evaluate in depth the clinical context of the patient, the patient's own history and patient-specific opportunities for better choosing and applying suicide prevention strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zora A. Sukabdi

Psychological criminogenic factors for identifying terrorist offenders at risk of recidivism in Indonesia remain unclear; hence the adequate assessment to those involved with terrorism and measurement of effective terrorism rehabilitation are questioned. ‘MIKRA’ Risk Assessment was developed to identify individual criminogenic risk factors and needs of terrorist offenders in Indonesia. It is formulated to set up future parameters of effective terrorism rehabilitation. MIKRA study involved thirty-two eminent Indonesian counterterrorism experts and practitioners in semistructured interviews and qualitative data analysis. The study identifies 18 individual risk factors and needs of ideology-based terrorist offenders that are grouped into one of three higher order domains: Motivation, Ideology, and Capability.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Greenberg ◽  
C. Dow ◽  
Duncan Bland

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lyne ◽  
Hillel Ephros ◽  
Scott Bolding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document