SOLAR PHYSICS: Space Weather Forecasters Plan a Boost in Surveillance Missions

Science ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 313 (5787) ◽  
pp. 607-607
Author(s):  
D. Normile
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasa Calogovic ◽  
Mateja Dumbović ◽  
Davor Sudar ◽  
Bojan Vršnak ◽  
Karmen Martinić ◽  
...  

<p><span>The Drag-based Model (DBM) is an analytical model for heliospheric propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) that predicts the CME arrival time and speed at Earth or any other given target in the solar system. It is based on the equation of motion and depends on initial CME parameters, background solar wind speed, w and the drag parameter γ. A very short computational time of DBM (< 0.01s) allowed us to develop the Drag-Based Ensemble Model (DBEM) that considers the variability of model input parameters by making an ensemble of n different input parameters to calculate the distribution and significance of the DBM results. Using such an approach, we apply DBEM to determine the most likely CME arrival times and speeds, quantify the prediction uncertainties and calculate the confidence intervals. Recently, a new DBEMv3 version was developed including the various improvements and Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) option for the CME geometry input as well as the CME propagation visualizations. Thus, we compare the DBEMv3 with previous DBEM versions (e.g. DBEMv2), evaluate it and determine the DBEMv3 performance and errors by using various CME-ICME lists. Compared to the previous versions, the DBEMv3 provides very similar results for all calculated output parameters with slight improvement in the performance. Based on the evaluation performed for 146 CME-ICME pairs, the DBEMv3 performance with mean error (ME) of -11.3 h, mean absolute error (MAE) of 17.3 h was obtained, similar to previous DBM and DBEM evaluations. Fully operational DBEMv3 web application was integrated as one of the ESA Space Situational Awareness portal services (https://swe.ssa.esa.int/current-space-weather) providing an important tool for space weather forecasters.</span></p>


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (T27A) ◽  
pp. 79-103
Author(s):  
James A. Klimchuk ◽  
Lidia van Driel-Gesztelyi ◽  
Carolus J. Schrijver ◽  
Donald B. Melrose ◽  
Lyndsay Fletcher ◽  
...  

Commission 10 deals with solar activity in all of its forms, ranging from the smallest nanoflares to the largest coronal mass ejections. This report reviews scientific progress over the roughly two-year period ending in the middle of 2008. This has been an exciting time in solar physics, highlighted by the launches of the Hinode and STEREO missions late in 2006. The report is reasonably comprehensive, though it is far from exhaustive. Limited space prevents the inclusion of many significant results. The report is divided into the following sections: Photosphere and chromosphere; Transition region; Corona and coronal heating; Coronal jets; flares; Coronal mass ejection initiation; Global coronal waves and shocks; Coronal dimming; The link between low coronal CME signatures and magnetic clouds; Coronal mass ejections in the heliosphere; and Coronal mass ejections and space weather. Primary authorship is indicated at the beginning of each section.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongxia Xie ◽  
Chunyang Ji

Automatic detection of solar events, especially uncommon events such as coronal dimming (CD) and coronal wave (CW), is very important in solar physics research. The CD and CW are not only related to the detection of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) but also affect space weather. In this paper, we have studied methods for automatically detecting them. In addition, we have collected and processed a dataset that includes the solar images and event records, where the solar images come from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) of Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the event records come from Heliophysics Event Knowledgebase (HEK). Different from the methods used before, we introduce the idea of deep learning. We train single-wavelength and multiwavelength models based on Faster R-CNN. In terms of accuracy, the single-wavelength model performs better. The multiwavelength model has a better detection performance on multiple solar events than the single-wavelength model.


Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 301 (5637) ◽  
pp. 1175-1176
Author(s):  
R. Stone

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1073-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-L. Lam ◽  
D. H. Boteler ◽  
L. Trichtchenko

Abstract. Active geomagnetic conditions on 12–13, 15–16, and 22–23 September 1999 resulted in geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) measurable in power systems in Canada and the United States. Different solar origins for these three events gave rise to dissimilar interplanetary signatures. We used these events to present three case studies, each tracing an entire space weather episode from its inception on the Sun, propagation through the interplanetary medium, manifestation on the ground as intense magnetic and electric fluctuations, and its eventual impact on technological systems.Key words. Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism (rapid time variations) – Interplanetary physics (interplanetary magnetic fields) – Solar physics, astrophysics, and astronomy (flares and mass ejections)


Space Weather ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Belehaki ◽  
Jean Lilensten ◽  
Toby Clark
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document