scholarly journals Comment on “Increased growing-season productivity drives earlier autumn leaf senescence in temperate trees”

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 371 (6533) ◽  
pp. eabg1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Norby

Zani et al. (Research Articles, 27 November 2020, p. 1066) propose that enhancement of deciduous tree photosynthesis in a CO2-enriched atmosphere will advance autumn leaf senescence. This premise is not supported by consistent observations from free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. In most FACE experiments, leaf senescence or abscission was not altered or was delayed in trees exposed to elevated CO2.

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 371 (6533) ◽  
pp. eabg2679
Author(s):  
Deborah Zani ◽  
Thomas W. Crowther ◽  
Lidong Mo ◽  
Susanne S. Renner ◽  
Constantin M. Zohner

Our study showed that increases in seasonal productivity drive earlier autumn senescence of temperate trees. Norby argues that this finding is contradicted by observations from free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments, where elevated CO2 has been found to delay senescence in some cases. We provide a detailed answer showing that the results from FACE studies are in agreement with our conclusions.


Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 370 (6520) ◽  
pp. 1066-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Zani ◽  
Thomas W. Crowther ◽  
Lidong Mo ◽  
Susanne S. Renner ◽  
Constantin M. Zohner

Changes in the growing-season lengths of temperate trees greatly affect biotic interactions and global carbon balance. Yet future growing-season trajectories remain highly uncertain because the environmental drivers of autumn leaf senescence are poorly understood. Using experiments and long-term observations, we show that increases in spring and summer productivity due to elevated carbon dioxide, temperature, or light levels drive earlier senescence. Accounting for this effect improved the accuracy of senescence predictions by 27 to 42% and reversed future predictions from a previously expected 2- to 3-week delay over the rest of the century to an advance of 3 to 6 days. These findings demonstrate the critical role of sink limitation in governing the end of seasonal activity and reveal important constraints on future growing-season lengths and carbon uptake of trees.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Zohner

<p><strong>Phenological shifts in plants greatly affect biotic interactions and lead to multiple feedbacks to the climate system</strong><strong>. Increases in growing-season length under warmer climates are expected to drive changes in water, nutrient, and energy fluxes as well as enhancing ecosystem carbon uptake</strong><strong>. Yet, future trajectories of growing-season lengths remain highly uncertain because the intrinsic and extrinsic factors triggering autumn leaf senescence, including lagged effects of spring and summer productivity</strong><strong>, are poorly understood. Here, we use 434,226 spring leaf-out and autumn leaf senescence observations of temperate trees from Central Europe between 1948 and 2015 to test the effect of seasonal photosynthetic activity on leaf senescence, thereby exploring the extent to which growing-season lengths are internally regulated by constraints on productivity. We found that spring and summer productivity was a critical driver of autumn phenology, with earlier leaf senescence in years with high seasonal photosynthetic activity. Our new process-based model, incorporating information on growing-season photosynthesis, increased the accuracy of existing autumn phenology models by 22–61%. Furthermore, the physiological constraint of growing-season photosynthesis reversed the predictions of autumn phenology over the rest of the century. </strong><strong>While current phenology models predict that leaf senescence will occur 7–19 days later </strong><strong>by the end of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>, </strong><strong>we estimate that leaf senescence will, in fact, advance by 3–6 days</strong><strong>.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Our results reveal important constraints on future growing-season lengths and the carbon uptake potential of temperate trees and enhance our capacity to forecast long-term changes in ecosystem functioning, which is critical to improve our understanding of Earth System dynamics in response to climate change.</strong></p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Adriana Sanchez ◽  
Nicole M. Hughes ◽  
William K. Smith

During fall leaf senescence in deciduous species, photosynthesis nears completion due to chlorophyll breakdown and re-assimilation. However, several other processes such as leaf nutrient uptake, re-translocation, and storage, or tissue dehydration to avoid frost damage, may be important and dependent upon stomatal opening. We report here on measured changes in photosynthesis (<em>A</em>), leaf conductance to water vapor (<em>g</em>), and WUE (estimated by <em>A/g</em>) in three deciduous tree species (<em>Acer saccharum, Cornus florida, </em>and<em> Ginkgo biloba</em>) during the weeks of leaf senescence preceding abscission. Substantial decreases in <em>A </em>of 60 up to 80% were not matched quantitatively by similar declines in <em>g</em> (40 to 70%), resulting in corresponding decreases in WUE (estimated by <em>A/g</em>) from near 50% to over 300% among the three species. This shift to a lower WUE may reflect adaptive value in maintaining a higher <em>g</em> relative to <em>A</em> during the fall leaf senescence period.


2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 819-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Calfapietra ◽  
Birgit Gielen ◽  
Maurizio Sabatti ◽  
Paolo De Angelis ◽  
Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Howsam ◽  
Kevin C Jones ◽  
Philip Ineson

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2875-2911 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Taneva ◽  
M. A. Gonzalez-Meler

Abstract. Soil respiration (RS) is a major flux in the global carbon (C) cycle and its responses to changing environmental conditions may exert a strong control on the residence time of C in terrestrial ecosystems and in turn influence the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases. Soil respiration consists of several components returning C of different nature and age to the atmosphere, with root/rhizosphere respiration often assumed to be the dominant and variable one. Rates of RS vary greatly in time and space and the mechanisms underlying this temporal variability, or the RS components responsible for it, are poorly understood. It is often assumed the Rs and its components are under abiotic control at almost all time scales. In this study, we used the ecosystem 13C tracer at the Duke Forest Free Air CO2 Enrichment site to separate forest RS into four components: root/rhizosphere respiration (RR), litter decomposition (RL), and decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) of two age classes – up to 8 years old and SOM older than 8 years. We then examined and found that diurnal and seasonal variability in the components of Rs occurred at different magnitudes and directions than total RS. Soil respiration was generally dominated by RSOM during the growing season (44% of daytime RS), especially at night. The contribution of heterotrophic respiration (RSOM and RL) to RS was not constant during the growing season, indicating that the seasonal variability seen in RR alone cannot explain the seasonal variability in RS. Although there was no diurnal variability in RS, there were significant compensatory differences in the contribution of individual RS components to daytime and nighttime rates. The average contribution of RSOM to RS was greater at night (54%) than during the day (44%) whereas the average contribution of RR to total RS was ~30% during the day and ~34% during the night. In contrast, RL constituted 26% of RS during the day and only 12% at night. Interestingly, the decomposition of C older than 8 years (Rpre-tr), which could contain the most recalcitrant C-pools in this forest, showed more pronounced and consistent diurnal variability than any other RS component, with nighttime rates on average 29% higher than daytime rates. In contrast, the decomposition of more recent, post-treatment C (Rpre-tr) did not vary diurnally. None of this diurnal variation in components of Rs could be explained by temperature and moisture variations and were likely due to biological controlling mechanisms. On growing season time scales some components of Rs varied with temperature moisture variations that also affect plant photosynthetic activity. Our results indicate that the variation observed in this forest on the components of RS is the result of complex interaction between dominant biotic controls (plant activity, mineralization constants, competition for substrates) over abiotic controls (temperature, moisture) in diurnal and seasonal time scales. Because RS integrates biological activity of several types of organisms, utilizing C of different chemistry, accessibility and ages, considering the controls and interaction among soil pools that result in the overall soil CO2 efflux is important in elucidating the controls on RS on ecosystem and atmospheric C-pools at different time scales.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document