Triggers for Research Ethics Consultation

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (118) ◽  
pp. 118cm1-118cm1 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Havard ◽  
M. K. Cho ◽  
D. Magnus
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. W4-W6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mildred K. Cho ◽  
Sara L. Tobin ◽  
Henry T. Greely ◽  
Jennifer McCormick ◽  
Angie Boyce ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Sharp ◽  
Holly A. Taylor ◽  
Margaret A. Brinich ◽  
Mary M. Boyle ◽  
Mildred Cho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hiroaki Yanagawa ◽  
Rumi Katashima ◽  
Chiho Sato ◽  
Kenshi Takechi ◽  
Hiroshi Nokihara ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marion Danis

This chapter provides a history of the development of research ethics consultation (REC) and an evaluation of its role in the conduct of research with human participants. It provides a brief overview of how and where REC is currently practiced. It also reviews and engages current debates on the appropriate methods and purpose of REC. Controversies are addressed, including the relationship of REC to research review committees, competency requirements for REC, the appropriate level of confidentiality of REC recommendations, who should have access to RECs, and handling of divergence between ethics guidance and the law. Finally, it explores the question of appropriate breadth of REC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document