scholarly journals The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad11+ gene encodes the large subunit of replication protein A.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2381-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Parker ◽  
R K Clyne ◽  
A M Carr ◽  
T J Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Protein

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein present in all eukaryotes. In vitro studies have implicated RPA in simian virus 40 DNA synthesis and nucleotide excision repair, but little direct information is available about the in vivo roles of the protein. We report here the cloning of the largest subunit of RPA (rpa1+) from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The rpa1+ gene is essential for viability and is expressed specifically at S phase of the cell cycle. Genetic analysis revealed that rpa1+ is the locus of the S. pombe radiation-sensitive mutation rad11. The rad11 allele exhibits pleiotropic effects consistent with an in vivo role for RPA in both DNA repair and DNA synthesis. The mutant is sensitive to both UV and ionizing radiation but is not defective in the DNA damage-dependent checkpoint, consistent with the hypothesis that RPA is part of the enzymatic machinery of DNA repair. When incubated in hydroxyurea, rad11 cells initially arrest with a 1C DNA content but then lose viability coincident with reentry into S phase, suggesting that DNA synthesis is aberrant under these conditions. A significant fraction of the mutant cells subsequently undergo inappropriate mitosis in the presence of hydroxyurea, indicating that RPA also plays a role in the checkpoint mechanism that monitors the completion of S phase. We propose that RPA is required to maintain the integrity of replication complexes when DNA replication is blocked. We further suggest that the rad11 mutation leads to the premature breakdown of such complexes, thereby preventing recovery from the hydroxyurea arrest and eliminating a signal recognized by the S-phase checkpoint mechanism.

scholarly journals An interaction between the DNA repair factor XPA and replication protein A appears essential for nucleotide excision repair.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5396-5402 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Li ◽  
X Lu ◽  
C A Peterson ◽  
R J Legerski
Keyword(s):  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Nucleotide Excision

Replication protein A (RPA) is required for simian virus 40-directed DNA replication in vitro and for nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we report that RPA and the human repair protein XPA specifically interact both in vitro and in vivo. Mapping of the RPA-interactive domains in XPA revealed that both of the largest subunits of RPA, RPA-70 and RPA-34, interact with XPA at distinct sites. A domain involved in mediating the interaction with RPA-70 was located between XPA residues 153 and 176. Deletion of highly conserved motifs within this region identified two mutants that were deficient in binding RPA in vitro and highly defective in NER both in vitro and in vivo. A second domain mediating the interaction with RPA-34 was identified within the first 58 residues in XPA. Deletion of this region, however, only moderately affects the complementing activity of XPA in vivo. Finally, the XPA-RPA complex is shown to have a greater affinity for damaged DNA than XPA alone. Taken together, these results indicate that the interaction between XPA and RPA is required for NER but that only the interaction with RPA-70 is essential.

scholarly journals Formation of a Complex between Nucleolin and Replication Protein a after Cell Stress Prevents Initiation of DNA Replication

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaron Daniely ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Cell Stress ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Binding Studies

We used a biochemical screen to identify nucleolin, a key factor in ribosome biogenesis, as a high-affinity binding partner for the heterotrimeric human replication protein A (hRPA). Binding studies in vitro demonstrated that the two proteins physically interact, with nucleolin using an unusual contact with the small hRPA subunit. Nucleolin significantly inhibited both simian virus 40 (SV-40) origin unwinding and SV-40 DNA replication in vitro, likely by nucleolin preventing hRPA from productive interaction with the SV-40 initiation complex. In vivo, use of epifluorescence and confocal microscopy showed that heat shock caused a dramatic redistribution of nucleolin from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Nucleolin relocalization was concomitant with a tenfold increase in nucleolin–hRPA complex formation. The relocalized nucleolin significantly overlapped with the position of hRPA, but only poorly with sites of ongoing DNA synthesis. We suggest that the induced nucleolin–hRPA interaction signifies a novel mechanism that represses chromosomal replication after cell stress.

scholarly journals Mechanism of Dynamic Binding of Replication Protein A to ssDNA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupam Mondal ◽  
Arnab Bhattacherjee
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dynamic Equilibrium ◽  
Diffusion Mechanism ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Dna Processing

AbstractReplication protein A (RPA) serves as hub protein inside eukaryotic cells, where it coordinates crucial DNA metabolic processes and activates the DNA-damage response system. A characteristic feature of its action is to associate with ssDNA intermediates before handing over them to downstream proteins. The length of ssDNA intermediates differs for different pathways. This means RPA must have mechanisms for selective processing of ssDNA intermediates based on their length, the knowledge of which is fundamental to elucidate when and how DNA repair and replication processes are symphonized. By employing extensive molecular simulations, we investigated the mechanism of binding of RPA to ssDNA of different lengths. We show that the binding involves dynamic equilibrium with a stable intermediate, the population of which increases with the length of ssDNA. The vital underlying factors are decoded through collective variable principal component analysis. It suggests a differently orchestrated set of interactions that define the action of RPA based on the sizes of ssDNA intermediates. We further estimated the association kinetics and probed the diffusion mechanism of RPA to ssDNA. RPA diffuses on short ssDNA through progressive ‘bulge’ formation. With long ssDNA, we observed a conformational change in ssDNA coupled with its binding to RPA in a cooperative fashion. Our analysis explains how the ‘short-lived,’ long ssDNA intermediates are processed quickly in vivo. The study thus reveals the molecular basis of several recent experimental observations related to RPA binding to ssDNA and provides novel insights into the RPA functioning in DNA repair and replication.Significance StatementDespite ssDNA be the common intermediate to all pathways involving RPA, how does the latter function differently in the DNA processing events such as DNA repair, replication, and recombination just based on the length of ssDNA intermediates remains unknown. The major hindrance is the difficulty in capturing the transient interactions between the molecules. Even attempts to crystallize RPA complexes with 32nt and 62nt ssDNA have yielded a resolved structure of only 25nt ssDNA wrapped with RPA. Here, we used a state-of-the-art coarse-grained protein-ssDNA model to unravel the detailed mechanism of binding of RPA to ssDNA. Our study illustrates the molecular origin of variations in RPA action during various DNA processing events depending on the length of ssDNA intermediates.

scholarly journals Replication protein A safeguards genome integrity by controlling NER incision events

2011 ◽  
Vol 192 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
René M. Overmeer ◽  
Jill Moser ◽  
Marcel Volker ◽  
Hanneke Kool ◽  
Alan E. Tomkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Dna Repair Synthesis

Single-stranded DNA gaps that might arise by futile repair processes can lead to mutagenic events and challenge genome integrity. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an evolutionarily conserved repair mechanism, essential for removal of helix-distorting DNA lesions. In the currently prevailing model, NER operates through coordinated assembly of repair factors into pre- and post-incision complexes; however, its regulation in vivo is poorly understood. Notably, the transition from dual incision to repair synthesis should be rigidly synchronized as it might lead to accumulation of unprocessed repair intermediates. We monitored NER regulatory events in vivo using sequential UV irradiations. Under conditions that allow incision yet prevent completion of repair synthesis or ligation, preincision factors can reassociate with new damage sites. In contrast, replication protein A remains at the incomplete NER sites and regulates a feedback loop from completion of DNA repair synthesis to subsequent damage recognition, independently of ATR signaling. Our data reveal an important function for replication protein A in averting further generation of DNA strand breaks that could lead to mutagenic and recombinogenic events.

scholarly journals Replication Protein A (RPA) Phosphorylation Prevents RPA Association with Replication Centers

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1930-1943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly M. Vassin ◽  
Marc S. Wold ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Chromosomal Dna

ABSTRACT Mammalian replication protein A (RPA) undergoes DNA damage-dependent phosphorylation at numerous sites on the N terminus of the RPA2 subunit. To understand the functional significance of RPA phosphorylation, we expressed RPA2 variants in which the phosphorylation sites were converted to aspartate (RPA2D) or alanine (RPA2A). Although RPA2D was incorporated into RPA heterotrimers and supported simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro, the RPA2D mutant was selectively unable to associate with replication centers in vivo. In cells containing greatly reduced levels of endogenous RPA2, RPA2D again did not localize to replication sites, indicating that the defect in supporting chromosomal DNA replication is not due to competition with the wild-type protein. Use of phosphospecific antibodies demonstrated that endogenous hyperphosphorylated RPA behaves similarly to RPA2D. In contrast, under DNA damage or replication stress conditions, RPA2D, like RPA2A and wild-type RPA2, was competent to associate with DNA damage foci as determined by colocalization with γ-H2AX. We conclude that RPA2 phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers in vivo and potentially serves as a marker for sites of DNA damage.

Physical interaction between archaeal DNA repair helicase Hel308 and Replication Protein A (RPA)

DNA Repair ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel L. Woodman ◽  
Kirsty Brammer ◽  
Edward L. Bolt
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Physical Interaction

The ionizing radiation-induced replication protein A phosphorylation response differs between ataxia telangiectasia and normal human cells

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7222-7231
Author(s):  
V F Liu ◽  
D T Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Inherited Disease ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
In Cells

Replication protein A (RPA), the trimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein complex of eukaryotic cells, is important to DNA replication and repair. Phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of RPA is modulated by the cell cycle, occurring during S and G2 but not during G1. The function of phosphorylated p34 remains unknown. We show that RPA p34 phosphorylation is significantly induced by ionizing radiation. The phosphorylated form, p36, is similar if not identical to the phosphorylated S/G2 form. gamma-Irradiation-induced phosphorylation occurs without new protein synthesis and in cells in G1. Mutation of cdc2-type protein kinase phosphorylation sites in p34 eliminates the ionizing radiation response. The gamma-irradiation-induced phosphorylation of RPA p34 is delayed in cells from ataxia telangiectasia, a human inherited disease conferring DNA repair defects and early-onset tumorigenesis. UV-induced phosphorylation of RPA p34 occurs less rapidly than gamma-irradiation-induced phosphorylation but is kinetically similar between ataxia telangiectasia and normal cells. This is the first time that modification of a repair protein, RPA, has been linked with a DNA damage response and suggests that phosphorylation may play a role in regulating DNA repair pathways.

scholarly journals Replication Protein A Confers Structure-specific Endonuclease Activities to the XPF-ERCC1 and XPG Subunits of Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease

1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (19) ◽  
pp. 11047-11050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Matsunaga ◽  
Chi-Hyun Park ◽  
Tadayoshi Bessho ◽  
David Mu ◽  
Aziz Sancar
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Human Dna

Equilibrium and Stop-Flow Kinetic Studies of Fluorescently Labeled DNA Substrates with DNA Repair Proteins XPA and Replication Protein A

Biochemistry ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia M. Iakoucheva ◽  
Randall K. Walker ◽  
Ben van Houten ◽  
Eric J. Ackerman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Kinetic Studies ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Dna Repair Proteins ◽  
Dna Substrates ◽  
Stop Flow
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document