scholarly journals Editing of glutamate receptor B subunit ion channel RNAs by four alternatively spliced DRADA2 double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2413-2424 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Lai ◽  
C X Chen ◽  
K C Carter ◽  
K Nishikura
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Expressed Sequence Tag ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
B Subunit ◽  
Site Selectivity ◽  
Hepatitis Delta Antigen ◽  
Terminal Structure

Double-stranded (ds) RNA-specific adenosine deaminase converts adenosine residues into inosines in dsRNA and edits transcripts of certain cellular and viral genes such as glutamate receptor (GluR) subunits and hepatitis delta antigen. The first member of this type of deaminase, DRADA1, has been recently cloned based on the amino acid sequence information derived from biochemically purified proteins. Our search for DRADA1-like genes through expressed sequence tag databases led to the cloning of the second member of this class of enzyme, DRADA2, which has a high degree of sequence homology to DRADA1 yet exhibits a distinctive RNA editing site selectivity. There are four differentially spliced isoforms of human DRADA2. These different isoforms of recombinant DRADA2 proteins, including one which is a human homolog of the recently reported rat RED1, were analyzed in vitro for their GluR B subunit (GluR-B) RNA editing site selectivity. As originally reported for rat RED1, the DRADA2a and -2b isoforms edit GluR-B RNA efficiently at the so-called Q/R site, whereas DRADA1 barely edits this site. In contrast, the R/G site of GluR-B RNA was edited efficiently by the DRADA2a and -2b isoforms as well as DRADA1. Isoforms DRADA2c and -2d, which have a distinctive truncated shorter C-terminal structure, displayed weak adenosine-to-inosine conversion activity but no editing activity tested at three known sites of GluR-B RNA. The possible role of these DRADA2c and -2d isoforms in the regulatory mechanism of RNA editing is discussed.

scholarly journals Regulation of glutamate receptor B pre-mRNA splicing by RNA editing

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 3723-3732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera K. Schoft ◽  
Sandy Schopoff ◽  
Michael F. Jantsch
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Mrna Splicing ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Glutamate Receptor Subunit ◽  
Splicing Efficiency ◽  
Intron Removal ◽  
Subunit B

Abstract RNA-editing enzymes of the ADAR family convert adenosines to inosines in double-stranded RNA substrates. Frequently, editing sites are defined by base-pairing of the editing site with a complementary intronic region. The glutamate receptor subunit B (GluR-B) pre-mRNA harbors two such exonic editing sites termed Q/R and R/G. Data from ADAR knockout mice and in vitro editing assays suggest an intimate connection between editing and splicing of GluR-B pre-mRNA. By comparing the events at the Q/R and R/G sites, we can show that editing can both stimulate and repress splicing efficiency. The edited nucleotide, but not ADAR binding itself, is sufficient to exert this effect. The presence of an edited nucleotide at the R/G site reduces splicing efficiency of the adjacent intron facilitating alternative splicing events occurring downstream of the R/G site. Lack of editing inhibits splicing at the Q/R site. Editing of both the Q/R nucleotide and an intronic editing hotspot are required to allow efficient splicing. Inefficient intron removal may ensure that only properly edited mRNAs become spliced and exported to the cytoplasm.

scholarly journals Recognition of RNA Editing Sites Is Directed by Unique Proteins in Chloroplasts: Biochemical Identification of cis-Acting Elements and trans-Acting Factors Involved in RNA Editing in Tobacco and Pea Chloroplasts

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 6726-6734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Miyamoto ◽  
Junichi Obokata ◽  
Masahiro Sugiura
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Mrna Editing ◽  
Higher Plant ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Biochemical Identification ◽  
Editing Activity

ABSTRACT RNA editing in higher-plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversions at specific sites. Although in vivo analyses have been performed, little is known about the biochemical aspects of chloroplast editing reactions. Here we improved our original in vitro system and devised a procedure for preparing active chloroplast extracts not only from tobacco plants but also from pea plants. Using our tobacco in vitro system, cis-acting elements were defined for psbE and petB mRNAs. Distinct proteins were found to bind specifically to each cis-element, a 56-kDa protein to the psbE site and a 70-kDa species to the petB site. Pea chloroplasts lack the corresponding editing site in psbE since T is already present in the DNA. Parallel in vitro analyses with tobacco and pea extracts revealed that the pea plant has no editing activity for psbE mRNAs and lacks the 56-kDa protein, whereas petB mRNAs are edited and the 70-kDa protein is also present. Therefore, coevolution of an editing site and its cognate trans-factor was demonstrated biochemically in psbE mRNA editing between tobacco and pea plants.

scholarly journals Uridylate Addition and RNA Ligation Contribute to the Specificity of Kinetoplastid Insertion RNA Editing

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 8447-8457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Igo ◽  
Setareh S. Palazzo ◽  
Moffett L. K. Burgess ◽  
Aswini K. Panigrahi ◽  
Kenneth Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
Correct Number ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Rna Ligation

ABSTRACT RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in mitochondrial pre-mRNAs under the direction of guide RNAs (gRNAs). We report here the development of a novel in vitro precleaved editing assay and its use to study the gRNA specificity of the U addition and RNA ligation steps in insertion RNA editing. The 5′ fragment of substrate RNA accumulated with the number of added U's specified by gRNA, and U addition products with more than the specified number of U's were rare. U addition up to the number specified occurred in the absence of ligation, but accumulation of U addition products was slowed. The 5′ fragments with the correct number of added U's were preferentially ligated, apparently by adenylylated RNA ligase since exogenously added ATP was not required and since ligation was eliminated by treatment with pyrophosphate. gRNA-specified U addition was apparent in the absence of ligation when the pre-mRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was single stranded and more so when it was base paired with gRNA. These results suggest that both the U addition and RNA ligation steps contributed to the precision of RNA editing.

scholarly journals Hepatitis Delta Virus RNA Editing Is Highly Specific for the Amber/W Site and Is Suppressed by Hepatitis Delta Antigen

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1919-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Polson ◽  
Herbert L. Ley ◽  
Brenda L. Bass ◽  
John L. Casey
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Hepatitis Delta Virus ◽  
Hepatitis Delta ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Adenosine Deaminases ◽  
Delta Antigen ◽  
Virus Rna ◽  
Hepatitis Delta Antigen ◽  
Delta Virus

ABSTRACT RNA editing at adenosine 1012 (amber/W site) in the antigenomic RNA of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) allows two essential forms of the viral protein, hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg), to be synthesized from a single open reading frame. Editing at the amber/W site is thought to be catalyzed by one of the cellular enzymes known as adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs). In vitro, the enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2 deaminate adenosines within many different sequences of base-paired RNA. Since promiscuous deamination could compromise the viability of HDV, we wondered if additional deamination events occurred within the highly base paired HDV RNA. By sequencing cDNAs derived from HDV RNA from transfected Huh-7 cells, we determined that the RNA was not extensively modified at other adenosines. Approximately 0.16 to 0.32 adenosines were modified per antigenome during 6 to 13 days posttransfection. Interestingly, all observed non-amber/W adenosine modifications, which occurred mostly at positions that are highly conserved among naturally occurring HDV isolates, were found in RNAs that were also modified at the amber/W site. Such coordinate modification likely limits potential deleterious effects of promiscuous editing. Neither viral replication nor HDAg was required for the highly specific editing observed in cells. However, HDAg was found to suppress editing at the amber/W site when expressed at levels similar to those found during HDV replication. These data suggest HDAg may regulate amber/W site editing during virus replication.

scholarly journals RNA Sequence and Base Pairing Effects on Insertion Editing in Trypanosoma brucei

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1567-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Igo ◽  
Sobomabo D. Lawson ◽  
Kenneth Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Base Pairing ◽  
Editing Efficiency ◽  
Rna Sequence ◽  
Guide Rnas

ABSTRACT RNA editing inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in kinetoplastid mitochondrial pre-mRNAs by a series of enzymatic steps. Small guide RNAs (gRNAs) specify the edited sequence. Editing, though sometimes extensive, is precise. The effects of mutating pre-mRNA and gRNA sequences in, around, and upstream of the editing site on the specificity and efficiency of in vitro insertion editing were examined. U's could be added opposite guiding pyrimidines, but guiding purines, particularly A's, were required for efficient ligation. A base pair between mRNA and gRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was not required for insertion editing, although it greatly enhanced its efficiency and accuracy. In addition, a gRNA/mRNA duplex upstream of the editing site enhanced insertion editing when it was close to the editing site, but prevented cleavage, and hence editing, when immediately adjacent to the editing site. Thus, several aspects of mRNA-gRNA interaction, as well as gRNA base pairing with added U's, optimize editing efficiency, although they are not required for insertion editing.

scholarly journals RNA Editing in Trypanosoma brucei Requires Three Different Editosomes

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Carnes ◽  
James Raffaello Trotter ◽  
Adam Peltan ◽  
Michele Fleck ◽  
Kenneth Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Unexpected Finding ◽  
Rnase Iii ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Additional Level

ABSTRACT Trypanosoma brucei has three distinct ∼20S editosomes that catalyze RNA editing by the insertion and deletion of uridylates. Editosomes with the KREN1 or KREN2 RNase III type endonucleases specifically cleave deletion and insertion editing site substrates, respectively. We report here that editosomes with KREPB2, which also has an RNase III motif, specifically cleave cytochrome oxidase II (COII) pre-mRNA insertion editing site substrates in vitro. Conditional repression and mutation studies also show that KREPB2 is an editing endonuclease specifically required for COII mRNA editing in vivo. Furthermore, KREPB2 expression is essential for the growth and survival of bloodstream forms. Thus, editing in T. brucei requires at least three compositionally and functionally distinct ∼20S editosomes, two of which distinguish between different insertion editing sites. This unexpected finding reveals an additional level of complexity in the RNA editing process and suggests a mechanism for how the selection of sites for editing in vivo is controlled.

scholarly journals A Novel Member of the RNase D Exoribonuclease Family Functions in Mitochondrial Guide RNA Metabolism in Trypanosoma brucei

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (12) ◽  
pp. 10329-10340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara L. Zimmer ◽  
Sarah M. McEvoy ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Jun Qu ◽  
Laurie K. Read
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Mitochondrial Gene ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Rna Turnover ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Guide Rnas

RNA turnover and RNA editing are essential for regulation of mitochondrial gene expression in Trypanosoma brucei. RNA turnover is controlled in part by RNA 3′ adenylation and uridylation status, with trans-acting factors also impacting RNA homeostasis. However, little is known about the mitochondrial degradation machinery or its regulation in T. brucei. We have identified a mitochondrial exoribonuclease, TbRND, whose expression is highly up-regulated in the insect proliferative stage of the parasite. TbRND shares sequence similarity with RNase D family enzymes but differs from all reported members of this family in possessing a CCHC zinc finger domain. In vitro, TbRND exhibits 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease activity, with specificity toward uridine homopolymers, including the 3′ oligo(U) tails of guide RNAs (gRNAs) that provide the sequence information for RNA editing. Several lines of evidence generated from RNAi-mediated knockdown and overexpression cell lines indicate that TbRND functions in gRNA metabolism in vivo. First, TbRND depletion results in gRNA tails extended by 2–3 nucleotides on average. Second, overexpression of wild type but not catalytically inactive TbRND results in a substantial decrease in the total gRNA population and a consequent inhibition of RNA editing. The observed effects on the gRNA population are specific as rRNAs, which are also 3′-uridylated, are unaffected by TbRND depletion or overexpression. Finally, we show that gRNA binding proteins co-purify with TbRND. In summary, TbRND is a novel 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease that appears to have evolved a function highly specific to the mitochondrion of trypanosomes.

Developmental changes of RNA editing of glutamate receptor subunits GluR5 and GluR6: in vivo versus in vitro

1997 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wulf Paschen ◽  
Justina Schmitt ◽  
Cornelia Gissel ◽  
Ernö Dux
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Developmental Changes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document