THE EFFECT OF EXTREME RAINFALL FROM HURRICANE FLORENCE ON GROUNDWATER-SURFACEWATER INTERACTIONS IN THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PLAIN: OBSERVATIONS FROM BARRIER ISLANDS AND A CAROLINA BAY

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.B. Zamora ◽  
◽  
C. Shank
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 9309
Author(s):  
Meredith Hovis ◽  
Joseph Chris Hollinger ◽  
Frederick Cubbage ◽  
Theodore Shear ◽  
Barbara Doll ◽  
...  

Increased global temperatures resulting from anthropogenically induced climate changes have increased the frequency and severity of adverse weather events, including extreme rainfall events, floods, and droughts. In recent years, nature-based solutions (NBS) have been proposed to retain storm runoff temporarily and mitigate flood damages. These practices may help rural farm and forest lands to store runoff and reduce flooding on farms and downstream communities and could be incorporated into a conservation program to provide payments for these efforts, which would supplement traditional farm incomes. Despite their potential, there have been very few methodical assessments and detailed summaries of NBS to date. We identified and summarized potential flood reduction practices for the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. These include agricultural practices of (1) cover cropping/no-till farming; (2) hardpan breakup; (3) pine or (4) hardwood afforestation, and (5) agroforestry; establishing the wetland and stream practices of (6) grass and sedge wetlands and earthen retention structures, (7) forest wetland banks, and (8) stream channel restoration; and establishing new structural solutions of (9) dry dams and berms (water farming) and (10) tile drainage and water retention. These practices offer different water holding and storage capacities and costs. A mixture of practices at the farm and landscape level can be implemented for floodwater retention and attenuation and damage reduction, as well as for providing additional farm and forest ecosystem services.


2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (9) ◽  
pp. 05017003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne R. Cizek ◽  
William F. Hunt ◽  
Ryan J. Winston ◽  
Matthew S. Lauffer

2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B. Spruill

Water-quality and hydrologic information were collected along ground-water flow paths from two well-drained and two poorly drained Coastal Plain settings in North Carolina to evaluate the relative effectiveness of riparian buffers in reducing discharge of nitrate to streams. At one well-drained site with a 100 m buffer, little or no effect was detected on surface-water quality by discharging ground water because extensive woody vegetation in the buffer was able to take up not only most nitrate, but also most ground water before discharging to the stream during the growing season (March-October). At the second well-drained site, ground water discharging to the stream from the side with a buffer contained about 2 mg/L of nitrate-nitrogen after passing through the bed of the stream compared to 6 mg/L in ground water discharging from the side with no buffer. In the poorly drained settings, nitrate in ground water decreased from about 6 mg/L in the recharge area to less than 0.02 mg/L downgradient from the riparian buffer. Ground water discharging from the side with no buffer contained 0.83 mg/L. Riparian buffers appear effective in reducing nitrate in ground water discharging to Coastal Plain streams.


1988 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Kellogg ◽  
J. E. Easley ◽  
Thomas Johnson

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1215-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Appelboom ◽  
G. M. Chescheir ◽  
R. W. Skaggs ◽  
J. W. Gilliam ◽  
D. M. Amatya

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document