Generalized Localization Principle for Continuous Wavelet Decompositions

2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 857-863
Author(s):  
R. R. Ashurov ◽  
Yu. É. Faiziev
1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Duval-Destin ◽  
M. A. Muschietti ◽  
B. Torresani

Author(s):  
RAVSHAN ASHUROV

The almost everywhere convergence of wavelets transforms of Lp-functions under minimal conditions on wavelets is well known. But this result does not provide any information about the exceptional set (of Lebesgue measure zero), where convergence does not hold. In this paper, under slightly stronger conditions on wavelets, we prove convergence of wavelet transforms everywhere on the entire Lebesgue set of Lp-functions. On the other hand, practically all the wavelets, including Haar and "French hat" wavelets, used frequently in applications, satisfy our conditions. We also prove that the same conditions on wavelets guarantee the Riemann localization principle in L1 for the wavelet transforms.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1106
Author(s):  
Jagdish N. Pandey

We define a testing function space DL2(Rn) consisting of a class of C∞ functions defined on Rn, n≥1 whose every derivtive is L2(Rn) integrable and equip it with a topology generated by a separating collection of seminorms {γk}|k|=0∞ on DL2(Rn), where |k|=0,1,2,… and γk(ϕ)=∥ϕ(k)∥2,ϕ∈DL2(Rn). We then extend the continuous wavelet transform to distributions in DL2′(Rn), n≥1 and derive the corresponding wavelet inversion formula interpreting convergence in the weak distributional sense. The kernel of our wavelet transform is defined by an element ψ(x) of DL2(Rn)∩DL1(Rn), n≥1 which, when integrated along each of the real axes X1,X2,…Xn vanishes, but none of its moments ∫Rnxmψ(x)dx is zero; here xm=x1m1x2m2⋯xnmn, dx=dx1dx2⋯dxn and m=(m1,m2,…mn) and each of m1,m2,…mn is ≥1. The set of such wavelets will be denoted by DM(Rn).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document