Gene pool of Buryats: Clinal variability and territorial subdivision based on data of Y-chromosome markers

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Kharkov ◽  
K. V. Khamina ◽  
O. F. Medvedeva ◽  
K. V. Simonova ◽  
E. R. Eremina ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 849-855
Author(s):  
V. N. Kharkov ◽  
L. M. Novikova ◽  
O. V. Shtygasheva ◽  
F. A. Luzina ◽  
I. Yu. Khitrinskaya ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Y. V. Bogunov ◽  
◽  
O. V. Maltseva ◽  
A. A. Bogunova ◽  
E. V. Balanovskaya ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1590) ◽  
pp. 812-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Thorsby

It is now generally accepted that Polynesia was first settled by peoples from southeast Asia. An alternative that eastern parts of Polynesia were first inhabited by Amerindians has found little support. There are, however, many indications of a ‘prehistoric’ (i.e. before Polynesia was discovered by Europeans) contact between Polynesia and the Americas, but genetic evidence of a prehistoric Amerindian contribution to the Polynesian gene pool has been lacking. We recently carried out genomic HLA (human leucocyte antigen) typing as well as typing for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y chromosome markers of blood samples collected in 1971 and 2008 from reputedly non-admixed Easter Islanders. All individuals carried HLA alleles and mtDNA types previously found in Polynesia, and most of the males carried Y chromosome markers of Polynesian origin (a few had European Y chromosome markers), further supporting an initial Polynesian population on Easter Island. The HLA investigations revealed, however, that some individuals also carried HLA alleles which have previously almost only been found in Amerindians. We could trace the introduction of these Amerindian alleles to before the Peruvian slave trades, i.e. before the 1860s, and provide suggestive evidence that they were introduced already in prehistoric time. Our results demonstrate an early Amerindian contribution to the Polynesian gene pool on Easter Island, and illustrate the usefulness of typing for immunogenetic markers such as HLA to complement mtDNA and Y chromosome analyses in anthropological investigations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana Santiago de Sousa Azulay ◽  
Luís Cristóvão Porto ◽  
Dayse Aparecida Silva ◽  
Maria da Glória Tavares ◽  
Roberta Maria Duailibe Ferreira Reis ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between genetic ancestry inferred from autosomal and Y chromosome markers and HLA genotypes in patients with Type 1 Diabetes from an admixed Brazilian population. Inference of autosomal ancestry; HLA-DRB1, -DQA1 and -DQB1 typifications; and Y chromosome analysis were performed. European autosomal ancestry was about 50%, followed by approximately 25% of African and Native American. The European Y chromosome was predominant. The HLA-DRB1*03 and DRB1*04 alleles presented risk association with T1D. When the Y chromosome was European, DRB1*03 and DRB1*04 homozygote and DRB1*03/DRB1*04 heterozygote genotypes were the most frequent. The results suggest that individuals from Maranhão have a European origin as their major component; and are patrilineal with greater frequency from the R1b haplogroup. The predominance of the HLA-DRB1*03 and DRB1*04 alleles conferring greater risk in our population and being more frequently related to the ancestry of the European Y chromosome suggests that in our population, the risk of T1D can be transmitted by European ancestors of our process miscegenation. However, the Y sample sizes of Africans and Native Americans were small, and further research should be conducted with large mixed sample sizes to clarify this possible association.


Biologija ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giedrė Ruzgaitė ◽  
Marija Čaplinskienė ◽  
Rima Baranovienė ◽  
Jūratė Jankauskienė ◽  
Jolanta Kukienė ◽  
...  

This paper presents a comprehensive Y-chromosomal STR haplotype analysis in the Lithuanian population in order to evaluate Lithuanians’ Y chromosome diversity, to infer genetic relations between Lithuanian and other European neighbouring populations and to introduce population reference data for generation of reliable Y-STR haplotype frequency estimates to be used in the quantitative assessment of Y-STR haplotype match in the forensic casework. Data were collected from the peripheral blood samples of 194 unrelated males throughout various regions of Lithuania. The amplification of 17 Y-STRs was carried out in one multiplex PCR using an  AmpFlSTR® Yfiler<sup>TM</sup> PCR Amplication Kit according to the supplier’s protocol. The results indicated that the Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity in the Lithuanian population rises as the  number of the  analyzed Y-STRs is increased. However, all additional Y-STR loci are not hypervariable and only their whole makes a large diversity of Y-STR haplotypes in Lithuanian males. The  analysis of molecular variance revealed low but significant interpopulation differences except the pair of Lithuanian and Latvian populations. The  phylogenetic analysis showed that the  clustered Y chromosome gene pool of Lithuanians and Latvians has a closer phylogenetic relation to Russian and Estonian populations and is less genetically related to other neighbouring populations of Belarus and Poland. Yet Y-STRs alleles and haplotypes differentiate effectively inside the  Lithuanian population and between Lithuanians and its geographical neighbours excluding the  Latvian population. Comparison of the Y-STR data suggests that Lithuanian and Latvian populations are closely related not only by geography and language but also by the Y chromosome gene pool represented by forensic Y-STR markers. Consequently, more forensic Y-STR markers should be included in the Y-STR haplotype in order to achieve a resolution between the  Y chromosomes of Lithuanian and Latvian males. Lithuanian Y-STR haplotype data were submitted to the 34th release of the Y-STR Haplotype Reference Database 3.0 for match probability calculations in the forensic casework.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-253
Author(s):  
O. M. Utevska ◽  
A. S. Pshenichnov ◽  
Kh. D. Dibirova ◽  
S. Rootsi ◽  
A. T. Agdzhoyan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tatiana Karafet ◽  
Stephen L. Zegura ◽  
Jennifer Vuturo-Brady ◽  
Olga Posukh ◽  
Ludmila Osipova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document