Variability of the Community Structure and Morphometric Parameters of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) under an Anthropogenic Impact Gradient

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1777-1784
Author(s):  
R. A. Sukhodolskaya ◽  
D. N. Vavilov ◽  
T. A. Gordienko ◽  
T. R. Mukhametnabiev
2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 249-253
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Cheverdin ◽  
V. A. Bespalov ◽  
T. V. Titova

2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 354-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Bolena Harten Pinto Costa ◽  
Ana Paula Maria Cavalcanti Valença ◽  
Paulo Jorge Parreira dos Santos

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Kook Jung ◽  
Seung-Tae Kim ◽  
Sue-Yeon Lee ◽  
Chang-Gyu Park ◽  
Jong-Kyun Park ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Radecki-Pawlik ◽  
Tomasz Skalski ◽  
Karol Plesiński ◽  
Wiktoria Czech

Abstract One more time we would like to pay attention of especially of the hydraulic engineer audience to bankfull stage and discharge. Along the paper we show commonly accepted definitions of it and ways of calculations. It is difficult to determine the size of the bankfull flow level, that is why the authors are presenting many selected methods. Some of the methods allow the determination of biotic bankfull flow through the occurrence of zones of vegetation characteristic and based on the observation of the occurrence of ground beetles (e.g. the Woodyer and the Radecki-Pawlik and Skalski methods). Some of the methods – most popular- are using morphometric parameters (e.g. the Williams, the Hey and Thorne, the Gauckler-Manning and finally the Lambor methods). We believe that the value of bankfull discharge would be accepted as a supporting tool for designers, hydraulics engineers and managers, especially those who care about river channel environment and cooperate with fluvial geomorphologists- and biologists as well as environmental agencies.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1475
Author(s):  
Sukhodolskaya Raisa ◽  
Saveliev Anatoliy ◽  
Mukhametnabiev Timur ◽  
Eremeeva Natalia

Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is used to reveal environmental or genetic stress, but the results of some studies are inconsistent. We aimed to give some explanations of possible controversial conclusions, when FA was employed. We measured FA (one dimensional and one meristic traits) in the recognized bioindicators—ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Beetles were sampled in a vast area (four provinces of Russia with the spectrum of the studied sites, which differed in anthropogenic impact, vegetation, and landscape features). On the basis of such measurements (4673 specimen) we created a data base. Subsequent ANOVA showed, that FA was species-specific (out of six species investigated it was expressed in five ones), sex-biased (males had higher levels of FA), and were affected practically by all environmental factors. Besides significant species–sex and factors–sex interactions were found. So, when employing FA as an indicator of stress, overall biological and ecological variation in species-indicator must be investigated before. Sometimes FA (or its absence) may not be due to pollution or another disturbing factor, but be the result of the effect of unaccounted but FA determinative factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document