Relativistic optical model on the basis of the Moscow potential and lower phase shifts for nucleon-nucleon scattering at laboratory energies of up to 3 GeV

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 2034-2044 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Knyr ◽  
V. G. Neudatchin ◽  
N. A. Khokhlov
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1650088
Author(s):  
V. I. Zhaba

A known phase-functions method (PFM) has been considered for calculation of a single-channel nucleon–nucleon scattering. The following partial waves of a nucleon–nucleon scattering have been considered using the phase shifts by PFM: 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3F3-states for nn-scattering, 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-states for pp-scattering and 1S0-, 1P1-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3D2-states for np-scattering. The calculations have been carried out using phenomenological nucleon–nucleon Nijmegen group potentials (NijmI, NijmII, Nijm93 and Reid93) and Argonne v18 potential. The scalar scattering amplitude has been calculated using the obtained phase shifts. Our results are not much different from those obtained by using the known phase shifts published in other papers. The difference between calculations depending on a computational method of phase shifts makes: for real (imaginary) parts 0.14–4.36% (0.16–4.05%) for NijmI. 0.02–4.79% (0.08–3.88%) for NijmII. 0.01–5.49% (0.01–4.14%) for Reid93 and 0.01–5.11% (0.01–2.40%) for Argonne v18 potentials.


1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 2499-2508 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Neudatchin ◽  
N. P. Yudin ◽  
Yu. L. Dorodnykh ◽  
I. T. Obukhovsky

1954 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Breit ◽  
J. B. Ehrman ◽  
A. M. Saperstein ◽  
M. H. Hull

1958 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 669-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Zastavenko ◽  
R.M. Ryndin ◽  
Chou Kuang-Chad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document