The phase-functions method and scalar amplitude of nucleon–nucleon scattering

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1650088
Author(s):  
V. I. Zhaba

A known phase-functions method (PFM) has been considered for calculation of a single-channel nucleon–nucleon scattering. The following partial waves of a nucleon–nucleon scattering have been considered using the phase shifts by PFM: 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3F3-states for nn-scattering, 1S0-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-states for pp-scattering and 1S0-, 1P1-, 3P0-, 3P1-, 1D2-, 3D2-states for np-scattering. The calculations have been carried out using phenomenological nucleon–nucleon Nijmegen group potentials (NijmI, NijmII, Nijm93 and Reid93) and Argonne v18 potential. The scalar scattering amplitude has been calculated using the obtained phase shifts. Our results are not much different from those obtained by using the known phase shifts published in other papers. The difference between calculations depending on a computational method of phase shifts makes: for real (imaginary) parts 0.14–4.36% (0.16–4.05%) for NijmI. 0.02–4.79% (0.08–3.88%) for NijmII. 0.01–5.49% (0.01–4.14%) for Reid93 and 0.01–5.11% (0.01–2.40%) for Argonne v18 potentials.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (08) ◽  
pp. 1650049
Author(s):  
V. I. Zhaba

A known phase-functions method (PFM) has been considered for calculation of a single-channel nucleon–nucleon scattering. The following phase shifts of a nucleon–nucleon scattering have been calculated numerically using the phase-functions method:[Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-states), [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-states) and [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-states). The calculations have been carried out using realistic nucleon–nucleon Nijmegen group potentials (NijmI, NijmII and Reid93) and Argonne v18 potential. Numerically calculated phase shifts are in good agreement with the results obtained with the other methods. The full cross-section has been calculated using the obtained phase shifts. Our results are not very different from those obtained by using the known phases published in the literature. The difference between calculations depending on a computational method of scattering phases makes: 0.2–6.3% for [Formula: see text]- and 0.1–5.3% for [Formula: see text]-scatterings (for NijmI, NijmII), 0.1–4.1% for [Formula: see text]- and 0.1–0.4% for [Formula: see text]-scatterings (Reid93), not more than 4.5% (Argonne v18).


1965 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 1377-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Dosch ◽  
V. F. Müller

1954 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Breit ◽  
J. B. Ehrman ◽  
A. M. Saperstein ◽  
M. H. Hull

1958 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 669-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Zastavenko ◽  
R.M. Ryndin ◽  
Chou Kuang-Chad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document