scholarly journals Comparison of the pressure time product during synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Manczur
2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muneyuki Takeuchi ◽  
Purris Williams ◽  
Dean Hess ◽  
Robert M. Kacmarek

Background A number of new microprocessor-controlled mechanical ventilators have become available over the last few years. However, the ability of these ventilators to provide continuous positive airway pressure without imposing or performing work has never been evaluated. Methods In a spontaneously breathing lung model, the authors evaluated the Bear 1000, Drager Evita 4, Hamilton Galileo, Nellcor-Puritan-Bennett 740 and 840, Siemens Servo 300A, and Bird Products Tbird AVS at 10 cm H(2)O continuous positive airway pressure. Lung model compliance was 50 ml/cm H(2)O with a resistance of 8.2 cm H(2)O x l(-1) x s(-1), and inspiratory time was set at 1.0 s with peak inspiratory flows of 40, 60, and 80 l/min. In ventilators with both pressure and flow triggering, the response of each was evaluated. Results With all ventilators, peak inspiratory flow, lung model tidal volume, and range of pressure change (below baseline to above baseline) increased as peak flow increased. Inspiratory trigger delay time, inspiratory cycle delay time, expiratory pressure time product, and total area of pressure change were not affected by peak flow, whereas pressure change to trigger inspiration, inspiratory pressure time product, and trigger pressure time product were affected by peak flow on some ventilators. There were significant differences among ventilators on all variables evaluated, but there was little difference between pressure and flow triggering in most variables on individual ventilators except for pressure to trigger. Pressure to trigger was 3.74 +/- 1.89 cm H(2)O (mean +/- SD) in flow triggering and 4.48 +/- 1.67 cm H(2)O in pressure triggering (P < 0.01) across all ventilators. Conclusions Most ventilators evaluated only imposed a small effort to trigger, but most also provided low-level pressure support and imposed an expiratory workload. Pressure triggering during continuous positive airway pressure does require a slightly greater pressure than flow triggering.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abalos ◽  
AB Leibowitz ◽  
D Distefano ◽  
N Halpern ◽  
TJ Iberti

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of silent myocardial ischemia, its pattern over time and its relationship to the time and mode of weaning high-risk cardiac patients after noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective study with random assignment to one of three weaning modes. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital and a Veterans Administration hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients meeting standard criteria for extubation were randomized to one of three modes of weaning: synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (n = 19), T-Bar (n = 21) or continuous positive airway pressure (n = 22). METHODS: Ischemia was monitored with a continuous two-lead (V5, III) ST segment analyzer. Tracings were reviewed by a cardiologist. Ischemia was defined as greater than 1 mm ST segment depression 60 milliseconds after the J point. The monitoring period included a prewean (mean 654.0 minutes), wean (mean 46.5 minutes) and postwean (mean 1223.4 minutes) period. RESULTS: Of 62 patients, 12 (19.3%) experienced ischemia at some time during the monitoring period, most often during the weaning period. Ischemia during weaning was detected in 3 of 21 (14.3%) T-Bar patients and 2 of 22 (9.1%) continuous positive airway pressure patients but in no synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that silent myocardial ischemia occurs frequently in high-risk postoperative patients, with the highest incidence during weaning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document