scholarly journals Presence of monosodium urate crystal deposition by dual-energy CT in patients with gout treated with allopurinol

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Dalbeth ◽  
Savvas Nicolaou ◽  
Scott Baumgartner ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Maple Fung ◽  
...  

ObjectiveDual-energy CT (DECT) detects and quantifies monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition with high precision. This DECT study assessed crystal deposition in patients with gout treated with stable-dose allopurinol, and investigated potential clinical determinants for crystal deposition.MethodsPatients with gout treated with allopurinol ≥300 mg daily for at least 3 months were prospectively recruited from the USA and New Zealand, using monitored enrolment to include approximately 25% patients with palpable tophi and approximately 50% with serum urate (sUA) levels <6.0 mg/dL (<357µmol/L). MSU crystal deposition was measured in the hands/wrists, feet/ankles/Achilles and knees bilaterally. The presence and total volume of crystals were assessed by DECT and analysed according to sUA levels and gout characteristics.ResultsAmong 152 patients receiving allopurinol ≥300 mg/day for 5.1 years on average, 69.1% had crystal deposition on DECT, with a median total crystal volume of 0.16 cm3 (range: 0.01–19.53 cm3). The prevalence of crystal deposition ranged from 46.9% among patients with sUA <6.0 mg/dL and no palpable tophi to 90.0% among those with sUA ≥6.0 mg/dL and tophi. Total volume of crystal deposition was positively associated with sUA ≥6.0 mg/dL, gout flares within the past 3 months and tophi. Total volume of crystal deposition correlated positively with Patient Global Impression of Disease Activity scores.ConclusionA substantial proportion of patients without palpable tophi have MSU crystal deposition, despite receiving allopurinol doses ≥300 mg/day for a considerable duration. Patients with higher sUA and clinical features of severe disease have a higher frequency and greater volume of MSU crystal deposition.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Dalbeth ◽  
Mariam Alhilali ◽  
Peter Riordan ◽  
Ravi Narang ◽  
Ashika Chhana ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-105
Author(s):  
Qianqian Ying ◽  
Jiapei Wang ◽  
Yunyan Li ◽  
Nan Sun ◽  
Yazhen Di ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe incidence of hyperuricemia (HUA) at younger ages is increasing along the coastal regions of China. This study aimed to compare the frequency of dual energy CT (DECT) urate crystal deposition between symptomatic hyperuricemic children and asymptomatic hyperuricemic children.Material and methodsFifty-six hyperuricemic children were divided into a Joint Group (n = 33) and an Asymptomatic Group (n = 23) according to whether they had a history of arthritis symptoms, which includes rapid onset monoarthritis with intense pain and swelling. We analyzed DECT scans of their feet from the Joint Group and the Asymptomatic Group and compared their clinical features.ResultsDECT urate deposits were observed in 28/33 (84.8%) children with symptomatic HUA and 14/23 (60.9%) with asymptomatic HUA. We found 60 areas of urate deposition in the Joint Group; DECT urate crystal deposition was most frequently observed in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint (30.0%), ankle joint (15.0%), and calcaneus (13.3%). 39 urate deposits were found in the Asymptomatic Group; DECT urate crystal deposition was most frequently observed in the calcaneus (25.6%), the first MTP joint (17.9%), and the first phalanx (15.4%).ConclusionsUrate deposition can occur in children with HUA, and these deposits occur more frequently in hyperuricemic children with a history of arthritis symptoms. Also, the urate deposition in the first MTP joint and calcaneus was more prevalent than in other joints. It is important to give more attention to hyperuricemic children.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudrun M. Feuchtner ◽  
Fabian Plank ◽  
Christoph Beyer ◽  
Christoph Schwabl ◽  
Julia Held ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 109.2-109
Author(s):  
T. Pascart ◽  
P. Carpentier ◽  
L. Norberciak ◽  
J. Legrand ◽  
E. Houvenagel ◽  
...  

Background:The close relationship between gout and cardiovascular diseases is well established. A growing hypothesis explaining this association would be that monosodium urate (MSU) crystals are deposited within vessel walls. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can identify and quantify MSU crystal deposition in soft tissues. It remains unclear whether vascular spots exhibiting DECT attenuation characteristics of MSU are artefacts or true MSU crystal deposits.Objectives:The objectives of this study were to determine whether the presence of peripheral vascular MSU crystal deposition identified with DECT is associated with the extent of MSU deposits in joint soft tissues, and if this association persists over time under urate-lowering therapy.Methods:Patients with a clinical suspicion or established gout diagnosis prospectively underwent DECT for identification and quantification of the MSU crystal burden in their knees and feet. Some of these patients were also enrolled in the GOUT-DECTUS longitudinal study, and thus underwent follow-up DECT scans of their knees and feet at 6, 12 and 24 months. DECT scans were examined for the presence of vascular spots ≥0.01 cm3 classified as MSU crystal deposits according to the default post-processing settings. Multiple linear regressions adjusting on serum urate levels and gout diagnosis were implemented to determine the association between DECT MSU crystal volume in joint soft tissues, and the presence of vascular MSU deposits. Mixed linear models were used to compare DECT volumes of MSU crystal deposition in soft tissues between vascular MSU positive and negative patients during follow-up.Results:A total of 169 patients were included, of which 140 had a final diagnosis of gout, including 15 also included in the longitudinal study. Patients were mostly male (78.8%) and were 65.5 ± 14.6 years old. Among gout patients, disease duration was 9.3 ± 9.9 years and 56.5% were urate lowering therapy-naive. A total of 11/29 (37.9%) controls and 40/140 (28.6%) gout patients presented with a least one vascular spot of DECT MSU deposition, with an average volume of 0.02 ± 0.02 cm3, and all subjects also presented at least one vascular calcification. In the feet, patients positive for vascular DECT MSU crystal deposition had an MSU volume of 3.81 ± 10.06 cm3 in joint soft tissues, compared with 1.85 ± 7.72 cm3 for those without vascular MSU deposition (p=0.018). In the knees, patients with vascular MSU deposition had an MSU crystal volume of 6.03 ± 24.13 cm3 in joint soft tissues, compared with 0.83 ± 2.88 cm3 for those without vascular evidence of MSU deposition. In the longitudinal subgroup analysis, coefficients of the fixed effects for the presence of vascular MSU deposits on the MSU crystal volume in joint soft tissues was 0.4 (p=0.35) in the feet and 1.21 (p=0.03) in the knees. The presence of vascular DECT MSU deposits was associated with a 3.4-fold increase in MSU crystal volume in knee joint soft tissues throughout follow-up.Conclusion:This study suggests that some vascular spots identified with DECT as MSU crystal deposition may be real and not artefacts. This correlation remains throughout follow-up in the knees. However, the comparable prevalence of vascular DECT MSU deposits between gout patients and controls, the systematic co-existence of vascular calcifications and the uneven regression under urate-lowering therapy requires further analysis to determine which DECT spots are artefacts and which are not.References:[1]Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Detection of Cardiovascular Monosodium Urate Deposits in Patients With Gout. Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, Strobl S, Gruber J, Feuchtner G, Bellmann-Weiler R, Weiss G, Stofferin H, Jaschke W.Disclosure of Interests:Tristan Pascart Grant/research support from: Research Grant Horizon Pharma, Consultant of: Novartis, BMS, Sanofi, Pfizer,, Speakers bureau: Novartis, BMS, Paul Carpentier: None declared, Laurène Norberciak: None declared, Julie Legrand: None declared, Eric Houvenagel Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Fabio Becce: None declared, Jean-François Budzik: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document