scholarly journals FRI0334 What is the absolute risk of developing diabetes mellitus in patients with glucocorticoid-treated polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis? a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
L Lai ◽  
E Harris ◽  
RM West ◽  
SL Mackie
2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1092.1-1092
Author(s):  
J.A. Prior ◽  
H. Ranjbar ◽  
J. Belcher ◽  
S. Mackie ◽  
C.D. Mallen

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamil D. Cooray ◽  
Jacqueline A. Boyle ◽  
Georgia Soldatos ◽  
Lihini A. Wijeyaratne ◽  
Helena J. Teede

Abstract Background Gestational diabetes (GDM) is increasingly common and has significant implications during pregnancy and for the long-term health of the mother and offspring. However, it is a heterogeneous condition with inter-related factors including ethnicity, body mass index and gestational weight gain significantly modifying the absolute risk of complications at an individual level. Predicting the risk of pregnancy complications for an individual woman with GDM presents a useful adjunct to therapeutic decision-making and patient education. Diagnostic prediction models for GDM are prevalent. In contrast, prediction models for risk of complications in those with GDM are relatively novel. This study will systematically review published prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with GDM, describe their characteristics, compare performance and assess methodological quality and applicability. Methods Studies will be identified by searching MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases. Title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. The included studies will be systematically assessed for risk of bias and applicability using appropriate tools designed for prediction modelling studies. Extracted data will be tabulated to facilitate qualitative comparison of published prediction models. Quantitative data on predictive performance of these models will be synthesised with meta-analyses if appropriate. Discussion This review will identify and summarise all published prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with GDM. We will compare model performance across different settings and populations with meta-analysis if appropriate. This work will guide subsequent phases in the prognosis research framework: further model development, external validation and model updating, and impact assessment. The ultimate model will estimate the absolute risk of pregnancy complications for women with GDM and will be implemented into routine care as an evidence-based GDM complication risk prediction model. It is anticipated to offer value to women and their clinicians with individualised risk assessment and may assist decision-making. Ultimately, this systematic review is an important step towards a personalised risk-stratified model-of-care for GDM to allow preventative and therapeutic interventions for the maximal benefit to women and their offspring, whilst sparing expense and harm for those at low risk. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42019115223


Author(s):  
Alwin Sebastian ◽  
Fiona Coath ◽  
Sue Innes ◽  
Jo Jackson ◽  
Kornelis S M van der Geest ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the ′Halo Sign′ in the assessment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). Methods A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane central register databases up to August 2020. Studies informing on the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasonographic halo sign for GCA (index test) were selected. Studies with a minimum of 5 participants were included. Study articles using clinical criteria, imaging such as Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) and/or temporal artery biopsy (TAB) as the reference standards were selected. Meta-analysis was conducted with a bivariate model. Results The initial search yielded 4023 studies. 23 studies (patients n = 2711) met the inclusion criteria. Prospective (11 studies) and retrospective (12 studies) studies in academic and non-academic centres were included. Using clinical diagnosis as the standard (18 studies) yielded a pooled sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 51– 80) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 89– 98%). This gave a positive and negative likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of GCA of 14.2 (95% CI: 5.7–35.5) and 0.375 (95% CI 0.22–0.54), respectively. Using TAB as the standard (15 studies) yielded a pooled sensitivity of 63% (95% CI : 50–75) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI: 81–95). Conclusion US halo sign is a sensitive and specific approach for GCA assessment and plays a pivotal role in diagnosing GCA in routine clinical practice. Registration PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020202179


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Brennan ◽  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Kenneth J. Warrington ◽  
Matthew J. Koster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document