397 High Flow Nasal Cannulae Cause Less Nasal Trauma Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants

IntroductionWe conducted a meta-analysis of trials that compared efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as primary respiratory support in preterm infants and a study of the impact of clinical relevant parameters.MethodsDatabases were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing HFNC with CPAP as primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Treatment failure was considered as primary outcome and adverse events as secondary outcomes. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) in intention-to-treat analysis and random-effects meta-analyses of risks were conducted.ResultsWe included 10 studies for a total of 1830 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated an RR of treatment failure multiplied by 1.34 using HFNC compared with CPAP (RR=1.34, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68, I2=16.2%). Secondary outcome meta-analysis showed no difference in intubation rates (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.15) and a lower rate of nasal trauma using HFNC compared with CPAP (RR=0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.65, I²=0.0%). Meta-regressions did not show any influence of gestational age and weight at birth, HFNC flow rate, type of CPAP generator or use of surfactant.ConclusionsDespite a higher risk of treatment failure, considering no difference in intubation rates and a lower rate of nasal trauma using HFNC compared with CPAP, we suggest that HFNC should be used as primary respiratory support in preterm infants.

Download Full-text

Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Post-extubation Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics ◽

10.1093/tropej/fmaa082 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Rameshwor Yengkhom ◽

Pradeep Suryawanshi ◽

Bhvya Gupta ◽

Sujata Deshpande

Keyword(s):

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Preterm Infants ◽

Airway Pressure ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Positive Airway Pressure ◽

Extubation Failure ◽

High Flow ◽

Nasal Cannula ◽

High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽

Nasal Trauma

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for prevention of extubation failure in preterm infants. Methods Preterm infants (gestation ≥28 weeks) were randomized to HHHFNC or nCPAP after extubation. Primary outcome was extubation failure within 72 h of extubation. Results A total of 128 preterm infants were randomized to receive either HHHFNC (n = 63) or nCPAP (n = 65) after extubation. The primary outcome of extubation failure within 72 h after extubation was not different between the two groups (HHHFNC, 22.2% vs. nCPAP, 18.5%, risk difference of 3.7% and 95% CI −10.3 to 17.6, p = 0.604). The incidence of nasal trauma was significantly lower in the HHHFNC group than in the nCPAP group 6.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.020. Conclusions In our study, HHHFNC was as effective as nCPAP for prevention of extubation failure in preterm infants. Also, HHHFNC was associated with significantly less nasal trauma compared with nCPAP.

Download Full-text