scholarly journals Pulmonary function test values due to a diaphragmatic hernia

2016 ◽  
pp. bcr2016216542
Author(s):  
Jesper Rømhild Davidsen ◽  
Leo Nygaard ◽  
Christian B Laursen ◽  
Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Jung Hwa Hwang ◽  
Chull Hee Cha ◽  
Jai Soung Park ◽  
Young Beom Kim ◽  
Hae Kyung Lee ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 380-381
Author(s):  
Dr. Rajula Tyagi ◽  
◽  
Dr.Devanshi U Dr.Devanshi U

B-ENT ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Alrabiah ◽  
◽  
Mohammed Jomah ◽  
Shatha Alduraywish ◽  
Shaffi Shaikh ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 1152-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Matsuzawa ◽  
K. Fujimoto ◽  
T. Kobayashi ◽  
N. R. Namushi ◽  
K. Harada ◽  
...  

It has been proposed that subjects susceptible to high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) show exaggerated hypoxemia with relative hypoventilation during the early period of high-altitude exposure. Some previous studies suggest the relationship between the blunted hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) and HAPE. To examine whether all the HAPE-susceptible subjects consistently show blunted HVR at low altitude, we evaluated the conventional pulmonary function test, hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), and hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) in ten lowlanders who had a previous history of HAPE and compared these results with those of eight control lowlanders who had no history of HAPE. HVR was measured by the progressive isocapnic hypoxic method and was evaluated by the slope relating minute ventilation to arterial O2 saturation (delta VE/delta SaO2). HCVR was measured by the rebreathing method of Read. All measurements were done at Matsumoto, Japan (610 m). All the HAPE-susceptible subjects showed normal values in the pulmonary function test. In HCVR, HAPE-susceptible subjects showed relatively lower S value, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (1.74 +/- 1.16 vs. 2.19 +/- 0.4, P = NS). On the other hand, HAPE-susceptible subjects showed significantly lower HVR than control subjects (-0.42 +/- 0.23 vs. -0.87 +/- 0.29, P less than 0.01). These results suggest that HAPE-susceptible subjects more frequently show low HVR at low altitude. However, values for HVR were within the normal range in 2 of 10 HAPE-susceptible subjects. It would seem therefore that low HVR alone need not be a critical factor for HAPE. This could be one of several contributing factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document