scholarly journals Younger women might benefit from breast cancer screening

BMJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 318 (7198) ◽  
pp. 1575-1575
Author(s):  
J. Wise
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lynn Chau ◽  
Amy Alabaster ◽  
Karin Luikart ◽  
Leslie Manace Brenman ◽  
Laurel A. Habel

Purpose: Half of US states mandate women be notified if they have dense breasts on their mammogram, yet guidelines and data on supplemental screening modalities are limited. Breast density (BD) refers to the extent that breast tissue appears radiographically dense on mammograms. High BD reduces the sensitivity of screening mammography and increases breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to determine the potential impact of California’s 2013 BD notification legislation on breast cancer screening patterns. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of women aged 40 to 74 years who were members of a large Northern California integrated health plan (approximately 3.9 million members) in 2011-2015. We calculated pre- and post-legislation rates of screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also examined whether women with dense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density c or d) had higher MRI rates than women with nondense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density a or b). Results: After adjustment for race/ethnicity, age, body mass index, medical facility, neighborhood median income, and cancer history, there was a relative 6.6% decrease (relative risk [RR] 0.934, confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.95) in the rate of screening mammography, largely driven by a decrease among women <50 years. While infrequent, there was a relative 16% increase (RR 1.16, CI 1.07-1.25) in the rate of screening MRI, with the greatest increase among the youngest women. In the postlegislation period, women with extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS d) had 2.77 times (CI 1.93-3.95) the odds of a MRI within 9 months of a screening mammogram compared with women with nondense breasts (BI-RADS b). Conclusions: In this setting, MRI rates increased in the postlegislation period. In addition, women with higher BD were more likely to have supplementary MRI. The decrease in mammography rates seen primarily among younger women may have been due to changes in national screening guidelines.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1502-1502
Author(s):  
Nina Beri ◽  
Kevin Houck ◽  
Victor Villagra ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Jeffrey M. Peppercorn

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J Yaffe ◽  
Roberta A Jong ◽  
Kathleen I Pritchard

Abstract Traditionally, the effectiveness of breast cancer screening has been measured in terms of reducing the number of deaths attributable to breast cancer. Other metrics such as the number of life-years or quality-adjusted life-years gained through screening may be more relevant and certainly may better reflect the important burden of the disease on younger women, their families, and society. The effects of earlier detection of breast cancer in reducing morbidities associated with treatment have often also been neglected. In addition, the harms and limitations associated with cancer screening have been poorly quantified and are seldom put into perspective vis-à-vis the benefits. Here, these alternative measures will be discussed and quantified.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 386-392
Author(s):  
N. Hadi ◽  
A. Sadeghi Hassanabadi ◽  
A. R. Talei ◽  
M. M. Arasteh ◽  
T. Kazerooni

A breast cancer screening programme was evaluated for approximately 10, 000 women aged 35 years and older. There were 67 cases of breast cancer. Highest rates of attendance were seen among younger women [35-44 years] and middle socioeconomic groups. Lowest rates were among those aged over 65 years and low socioeconomic groups. The rate of detection by self-examination was similar to that by health personnel examination. At all stages of screening, positive findings were most common among the high socioeconomic class. Attendance decreased steadily from first to last stages of serial screening. Although mammography is the most sensitive method of detection, because of its high cost we suggest establishing breast self-examination education programmes and encouraging women to self-examine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 3836-3870
Author(s):  
Liran Einav ◽  
Amy Finkelstein ◽  
Tamar Oostrom ◽  
Abigail Ostriker ◽  
Heidi Williams

We analyze selection into screening in the context of recommendations that breast cancer screening start at age 40. Combining medical claims with a clinical oncology model, we document that compliers with the recommendation are less likely to have cancer than younger women who select into screening or women who never screen. We show this selection is quantitatively important: shifting the recommendation from age 40 to 45 results in three times as many deaths if compliers were randomly selected than under the estimated patterns of selection. The results highlight the importance of considering characteristics of compliers when making and designing recommendations. (JEL I12, I18, J16)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document