High sensitivity cardiac troponin in patients with chest pain

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 347 (jul22 1) ◽  
pp. f4222-f4222 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. V. Shah ◽  
D. E. Newby ◽  
N. L. Mills
2020 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 84-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Lau ◽  
Maria Koh ◽  
Peter A. Kavsak ◽  
Michael J. Schull ◽  
David W.J. Armstrong ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1208-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volkher Scharnhorst ◽  
Krisztina Krasznai ◽  
Marcel van 't Veer ◽  
Rolf H Michels

Abstract BACKGROUND New-generation high-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponin have lower detection limits and less imprecision than earlier assays. Reference 99th-percentile cutoff values for these new assays are also lower, leading to higher frequencies of positive test results. When cardiac troponin concentrations are minimally increased, serial testing allows discrimination of myocardial infarction from other causes of increased cardiac troponin. We assessed various measures of short-term variation, including absolute concentration changes, reference change values (RCVs), and indices of individuality (II) for 2 cardiac troponin assays in emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS We collected blood from patients presenting with cardiac chest pain upon arrival in the ED and 2, 6, and 12 h later. Cardiac troponin was measured with the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay (Roche Diagnostics) and a sensitive cTnI assay (Siemens Diagnostics). Cardiac troponin results from 67 patients without acute coronary syndrome or stable angina were used in calculating absolute changes in cardiac troponin, RCVs, and II. RESULTS The 95th percentiles for absolute change in cardiac troponin were 8.3 ng/L for hs-cTnT and 28 ng/L for cTnI. Within-individual and total CVs were 11% and 14% for hs-cTnT and 18% and 21% for cTnI, respectively. RCVs were 38% (hs-cTnT) and 57% (cTnI). The corresponding log-normal RCVs were +46%/−32% for hs-cTnT and +76%/−43% for cTnI. II values were 0.31 (cTnI) and 0.12 (hs-cTnT). CONCLUSIONS The short-term variations and IIs of cardiac troponin were low in ED patients free of ischemic myocardial necrosis. The detection of cardiac troponin variation exceeding reference thresholds can help to identify ED patients with acute myocardial necrosis whereas variation within these limits renders acute coronary syndrome unlikely.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 1-276
Author(s):  
Marie Westwood ◽  
Bram Ramaekers ◽  
Sabine Grimm ◽  
Gill Worthy ◽  
Debra Fayter ◽  
...  

Background Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions. Objectives To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. Methods Sixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state–transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used. Results Thirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys® Troponin-T high sensitive (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (< 12 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 3 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective. For a threshold > £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Dimension Vista® High-Sensitivity Troponin I (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) (< 5 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 2 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective. Conclusions High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 744-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz Biener ◽  
Matthias Mueller ◽  
Mehrshad Vafaie ◽  
Hugo A Katus ◽  
Evangelos Giannitsis

Abstract BACKGROUND Diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) varies depending on presenting symptoms in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS We compared performance measures of hs-cTnT among patients admitted to the emergency department with typical chest pain (angina), dyspnea, and atypical symptoms and assessed outcomes by leading presenting symptoms. RESULTS A total of 658 patients suspected of ACS and presenting with typical chest pain (n = 241, 36.6%), dyspnea (n = 142, 21.6%), or atypical symptoms (n = 275, 41.8%) were included. Diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnT on admission was higher among patients with typical chest pain compared to those with atypical symptoms [area under the curve (AUC) 0.823 vs AUC 0.776 vs AUC 0.705, P &gt; 0.05 and P = 0.04]. Absolute concentration changes within 6 h improved accuracy among all subgroups, with the smallest added benefit in typical chest pain and dyspnea (ΔAUC, 0.078; P = 0.02 and 0.05, P &gt; 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, dyspnea was associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.26–4.43, P = 0.008) and death/AMI (hazard ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21–4.11, P = 0.01) compared to typical chest pain. Optimal discriminating values for hs-cTnT were higher among patients presenting with dyspnea compared to those with typical chest pain (91.2 vs 14.1 ng/L, P &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of hs-cTnT in patients with suspected ACS depends on the leading presenting symptom. Patients admitted with dyspnea represent a high-risk cohort in which the diagnosis of ACS is less frequent and with inferior performance of serial hs-cTnT measurements. Higher hs-cTnT cutoffs at baseline and absolute changes after 6 h help to identify non-STEMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document