58 Acute low back pain in australian general practice: image requests according to medicineinsight

Author(s):  
Melissa Chapman ◽  
Josh Meyers ◽  
Sheena O’Riordan
2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Darlow ◽  
Sarah Dean ◽  
Meredith Perry ◽  
Fiona Mathieson ◽  
G David Baxter ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Berry ◽  
D. R. Hutchinson

Patients (112) with acute low-back pain of recent onset were recruited to this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel group study in general practice to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the muscle relaxant, tizanidine. They were treated for 7 days with tizanidine (4 mg three times daily) or matching placebo. Aspirin tablets (300 mg) were taken as required as ‘rescue’ medication. Symptoms were assessed by the patient and doctor before treatment, and after 3 and 7 days. Patients recorded pain and aspirin consumption in a daily diary. Both treatments were effective. In patients who had taken no medication prior to entry, aspirin consumption was almost halved in the first 3 days of taking tizanidine compared with placebo ( P = 0.037). Results for pain at rest, pain at night, restriction of movement and pain on movement suggest that tizanidine may give greater improvement, earlier. No serious drug-related adverse events or abnormal biochemistry or haematology were observed in either group. Drowsiness occurred in 22% of patients taking tizanidine although, in patients with severe acute low-back pain, sedation, analgesia and bed rest might be beneficial and desired. Considerably more patients given aspirin/placebo had gastro-intestinal side-effects ( P = 0.018). In conclusion, tizanidine may reduce the need for analgesics and be useful in the treatment of acute low-back pain.


BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 331 (7508) ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Jellema ◽  
Daniëlle A W M van der Windt ◽  
Henriëtte E van der Horst ◽  
Jos W R Twisk ◽  
Wim A B Stalman ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystian B Oliveira ◽  
Melanie Hamilton ◽  
Adrian Traeger ◽  
Rachelle Buchbinder ◽  
Bethan Richards ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There is a common belief that patients presenting to emergency departments have more severe pain levels and functional limitations than those who are seen in general practice. The aim of this systematic review was to compare pain and disability levels of patients with acute low back pain presenting to general practice vs those presenting to emergency departments. Methods Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from database inception to February 2019. Observational studies including patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments and/or general practice were eligible. Pain and/or disability scores expressed on a 0–100 scale were the primary outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated with a validated tool for observational studies, and the overall quality of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis with random effects and meta-regression were used to test for differences between the two settings. Results We included 12 records reporting results for 10 unique studies with a total of 6,999 participants from general practice (n = 6) and emergency departments (n = 4). There was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher pain scores than those in general practice, with a mean difference of 17.3 points (95% confidence interval: 8.8 to 25.9 on a 0–100 scale). Similarly, there was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher disability scores than those in general practice (mean difference: 21.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 38.7 on a 0–100 scale). Conclusion Patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments may report higher levels of pain and disability than those seen in general practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document