scholarly journals Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. e005297-e005297 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dossing ◽  
S. Tarp ◽  
D. E. Furst ◽  
C. Gluud ◽  
J. Beyene ◽  
...  
protocols.io ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Kataoka ◽  
Shiho Oide ◽  
Takashi Ariie ◽  
Yasushi Tsujimoto ◽  
Toshi A

BMJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 350 (may27 2) ◽  
pp. h2445-h2445 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Abraha ◽  
A. Cherubini ◽  
F. Cozzolino ◽  
R. De Florio ◽  
M. L. Luchetta ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohammod Mostazir ◽  
Gordon Taylor ◽  
William Edward Henley ◽  
Edward Robert Watkins ◽  
Rod S Taylor

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e027864
Author(s):  
Chunmei Zhao ◽  
Yitong Jia ◽  
Zipu Jia ◽  
Xiong Xiao ◽  
Fang Luo

IntroductionPre-emptive scalp infiltration with local anaesthetics is the simplest and most effective method to prevent postoperative incisional pain. However, local infiltration of an anaesthetic only provides relatively short-term pain relief. Methylprednisolone (MP) treatment, administered as an adjuvant at the wound site, has been shown to provide satisfactory pain management after lumbar laminectomy. However, there is no evidence regarding the efficacy of MP infiltration for the relief of postoperative pain after craniotomy. Currently, postoperative pain after craniotomy in children is undertreated. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether pre-emptive scalp infiltration with ropivacaine (RP) plus MP is superior to RP alone to improve postoperative pain after craniotomy in children.Methods and analysisThe RP/MP versus RP trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, parallel-group study of 100 children aged 8–18 years undergoing intracranial surgery. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive pre-emptive scalp infiltration with either RP plus MP or RP alone. The primary outcome will be the cumulative fentanyl dose administered by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia within 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will include postoperative Numerical Rating Scale scores, pain control satisfaction scores, length of stay and adverse events. Data will be analysed by the intention-to-treat principle.Ethical approval and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (Approval Number: KY 2018-066-02). The results will be disseminated in international academic meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03636165; Pre-results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ruano ◽  
Francisco Gómez-García ◽  
Jesús Gay-Mimbrera ◽  
Macarena Aguilar-Luque ◽  
José Luis Fernández-Rueda ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e032957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Fang ◽  
Xinxing Guo ◽  
Yangfan Yang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xiangxi Chen ◽  
...  

IntroductionTrabeculotomy and combined trabeculotomy–trabeculectomy (CTT) are major surgical options for primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). However, it is unclear which of these two surgical procedures should be recommended as the optimum first-line treatment for PCG. This trial aims to determine whether the outcomes of trabeculotomy are non-inferior to those of CTT in moderate PCG with a horizontal corneal diameter (HCD) of 12–14 mm.Methods and analysisThis is a 3-year, non-inferiority, prospective, randomised controlled trial. We plan to recruite 248 participants (aged ≤3 years) with PCG with an HCD of 12–14 mm from the Department of Glaucoma, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. One eye per participant will be randomly (1:1) assigned to receive trabeculotomy or CTT. The primary outcome is the 3-year postoperative success rate in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), and the secondary clinical outcomes will include IOP reduction, visual acuity, HCD, central corneal thickness, axial length, cup–disc ratio, refractive error and postoperative complications. Data will be analysed by the intention-to-treat principle.Ethical approval and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (2014MEKY023) and the ‘5010 Plan’ evaluation committee at Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. The results will be disseminated in international academic meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-14005588; Date registered: 20 November 2014.


BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e005757-e005757 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. K. Tan ◽  
R. Visvanathan ◽  
S. N. Hilmer ◽  
A. I. Vitry ◽  
T. Quirke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document