scholarly journals Using trigger tools to identify triage errors by ambulance dispatch nurses in Sweden: an observational study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e035004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Spangler ◽  
Lennart Edmark ◽  
Ulrika Winblad ◽  
Jessica Colldén-Benneck ◽  
Helena Borg ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess whether trigger tools were useful identifying triage errors among patients referred to non-emergency care by emergency medical dispatch nurses, and to describe the characteristics of these patients.DesignAn observational study of patients referred by dispatch nurses to non-emergency care.SettingDispatch centres in two Swedish regions.ParticipantsA total of 1089 adult patients directed to non-emergency care by dispatch nurses between October 2016 and February 2017. 53% were female and the median age was 61 years.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was a visit to an emergency department within 7 days of contact with the dispatch centre. Secondary outcomes were (1) visits related to the primary contact with the dispatch centre, (2) provision of care above the primary level (ie, interventions not available at a typical local primary care centre) and (3) admission to hospital in-patient care.ResultsOf 1089 included patients, 260 (24%) visited an emergency department within 7 days. Of these, 209 (80%) were related to the dispatch centre contact, 143 (55%) received interventions above the primary care level and 99 (38%) were admitted to in-patient care. Elderly (65+) patients (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.98) and patients referred onwards to other healthcare providers (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.19) had higher likelihoods of visiting an emergency department. Six avoidable patient harms were identified, none of which were captured by existing incident reporting systems, and all of which would have received an ambulance if the decision support system had been strictly adhered to.ConclusionThe use of these patient outcomes in the framework of a Global Trigger Tool-based review can identify patient harms missed by incident reporting systems in the context of emergency medical dispatching. Increased compliance with the decision support system has the potential to improve patient safety.

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 859-P
Author(s):  
JAY R. DESAI ◽  
A. LAUREN CRAIN ◽  
DANIEL SAMAN ◽  
JOANN M. SPERL-HILLEN ◽  
CLAYTON ALLEN ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger K. Holmström ◽  
Susan Gustafsson ◽  
Josefin Wesström ◽  
Karin Skoglund

2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 712-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Knab ◽  
Mark S. Wallace ◽  
R. Lee Wagner ◽  
John Tsoukatos ◽  
Matthew B. Weinger

Author(s):  
Tristan Delory ◽  
Pauline Jeanmougin ◽  
Sylvie Lariven ◽  
Jean-Pierre Aubert ◽  
Nathan Peiffer-Smadja ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To describe the implementation and use of a computerized decision support system (CDSS) for antibiotic prescription in primary care in France (Antibioclic). The CDSS targets 37 infectious diseases and has been freely available on a website since 2011. Methods Description and implementation of the architecture of a CDSS for antibiotic prescription in general practice. Analysis of the queries made between 2012 and 2018 on the CDSS by GPs. Analysis of two cross-sectional studies of users in 2014 and 2019. Results The number of queries increased from a median of 796/day [IQR, 578–989] in 2012 to 11 125/day [5592–12 505] in 2018. Unique users increased from 414/day [245–494] in 2012 to 5365/day [2891–5769] in 2018. Time taken to make a query was 2 min [1.9–2.1]. Among 3 542 347 queries in 2018, 78% were for adults. Six situations accounted for ≥50% of queries: cystitis; acute otitis media; acute sinusitis; community-acquired pneumonia; sore throat; and pyelonephritis. Queries concerned pathologies for which antibiotic prescription was necessary (64%), was conditional on additional clinical steps (34%) or was not recommended (2%). Most users (81%) were GPs, with median age of 38 years [31–52] and 58% were female. Among the 4016 GPs who responded to the surveys, the vast majority (96%) reported using the CDSS during the consultation, with 24% systematically using Antibioclic to initiate an antibiotic course and 93% having followed the CDSS recommendation for the latest prescription. Most GPs were comfortable using the CDSS in front of a patient. Conclusions Antibioclic has been adopted and is widely used in primary care in France. Its interoperability could allow its adaptation and implementation in other countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie L. Russell ◽  
Ariel Port Greenblatt ◽  
Danni Gomes ◽  
Shirley Birenz ◽  
Cynthia A. Golembeski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document