scholarly journals EMPOWERING CARE HOME STAFF TO DELIVER QUALITY END OF LIFE CARE: THE IMPACT OF THE SIX STEPS TO SUCCESS PROGRAMME ON END OF LIFE CARE IN CARE HOMES IN NORTH WEST ENGLAND

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A32.2-A32
Author(s):  
Mary O'Brien ◽  
Jennifer Kirton ◽  
Katherine Knighting ◽  
Rob Gandy ◽  
Barbara Jack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Life Care ◽  
North West ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Palliative and end-of-life care in care homes: protocol for codesigning and implementing an appropriate scalable model of Needs Rounds in the UK

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e049486
Author(s):  
Aisha Macgregor ◽  
Alasdair Rutherford ◽  
Brendan McCormack ◽  
Jo Hockley ◽  
Margaret Ogden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
The Uk

IntroductionPalliative and end-of-life care in care homes is often inadequate, despite high morbidity and mortality. Residents can experience uncontrolled symptoms, poor quality deaths and avoidable hospitalisations. Care home staff can feel unsupported to look after residents at the end of life. Approaches for improving end-of-life care are often education-focused, do not triage residents and rarely integrate clinical care. This study will adapt an evidence-based approach from Australia for the UK context called ‘Palliative Care Needs Rounds’ (Needs Rounds). Needs Rounds combine triaging, anticipatory person-centred planning, case-based education and case-conferencing; the Australian studies found that Needs Rounds reduce length of stay in hospital, and improve dying in preferred place of care, and symptoms at the end of life.Methods and analysisThis implementation science study will codesign and implement a scalable UK model of Needs Rounds. The Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework will be used to identify contextual barriers and use facilitation to enable successful implementation. Six palliative care teams, working with 4–6 care homes each, will engage in two phases. In phase 1 (February 2021), stakeholder interviews (n=40) will be used to develop a programme theory to meet the primary outcome of identifying what works, for whom in what circumstances for UK Needs Rounds. Subsequently a workshop to codesign UK Needs Rounds will be run. Phase 2 (July 2021) will implement the UK model for a year. Prospective data collection will focus on secondary outcomes regarding hospitalisations, residents’ quality of death and care home staff capability of adopting a palliative approach.Ethics and disseminationFrenchay Research Ethics Committee (287447) approved the study. Findings will be disseminated to policy-makers, care home/palliative care practitioners, residents/relatives and academic audiences. An implementation package will be developed for practitioners to provide the tools and resources required to adopt UK Needs Rounds.Registration detailsRegistration details: ISRCTN15863801.

scholarly journals P-198 Care home staff experiences of palliative and end-of-life care in care homes during COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabele Batkovskyte ◽  
Lori Bourke ◽  
Clare Ellis-Smith ◽  
Anna Bone ◽  
Claire Goodman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Staff Experiences

scholarly journals A qualitative comparison of care home staff and palliative care specialists’ experiences of providing end of life care to people living and dying with dementia in care homes in two countries: A focus group study

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110433
Author(s):  
Melanie Handley ◽  
Deborah Parker ◽  
Frances Bunn ◽  
Claire Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Sustainable Solutions ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia

Background: Palliative care for people with dementia dying in care homes is an important aspect of long-term care. Whilst there is consensus about the principles of palliative care, less is known about how care home staff negotiate and influence decisions around end of life and how organisational context shapes that process. Aim: To explore the views and experiences of care home staff and palliative care specialists on end of life care in care homes and understand how care home settings affected palliative care provision in England and Australia. Design/participants: Eight focus groups in Australia and England with care home staff and palliative care specialists ( n = 49). Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. Findings: Australian participants reported collaboration between care home staff, visiting professions and family members though case conferences. English participants discussed resident-focussed involvement from specialists that was less formally organised. Negotiating roles and responsibilities in end of life care; the importance of relationships to overcome deficiencies in formal processes; and the legitimacy and authority of advance care planning at times of crisis were recurring themes. The organisation and embedding of end of life care in processes and practices of care homes differed; this closely linked to care home procedures in Australia but was less apparent in England. Conclusion: In both countries, partnership working was recognised and valued as key to effective palliative care. Work that enables care home staff to identify challenges with visiting professionals, such as agreeing priorities for care and negotiating their shared responsibilities, may lead to context-sensitive, sustainable solutions.

End of life care education to care home staff: an evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Dobie ◽  
Marlis Plumb ◽  
Sarah Shepherd
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Care Home Staff

scholarly journals GPs’ involvement to improve care quality in care homes in the UK: a realist review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
pp. 1-76
Author(s):  
Neil H Chadborn ◽  
Reena Devi ◽  
Christopher Williams ◽  
Kathleen Sartain ◽  
Claire Goodman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
General Practitioner ◽  
Health Services ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Uk

Background Organising health-care services for residents living in care homes is an important area of development in the UK and elsewhere. Medical care is provided by general practitioners in the UK, and the unique arrangement of the NHS means that general practitioners are also gatekeepers to other health services. Despite recent focus on improving health care for residents, there is a lack of knowledge about the role of general practitioners. Objectives First, to review reports of research and quality improvement (or similar change management) in care homes to explore how general practitioners have been involved. Second, to develop programme theories explaining the role of general practitioners in improvement initiatives and outcomes. Design A realist review was selected to address the complexity of integration of general practice and care homes. Setting Care homes for older people in the UK, including residential and nursing homes. Participants The focus of the literature review was the general practitioner, along with care home staff and other members of multidisciplinary teams. Alongside the literature, we interviewed general practitioners and held consultations with a Context Expert Group, including a care home representative. Interventions The primary search did not specify interventions, but captured the range of interventions reported. Secondary searches focused on medication review and end-of-life care because these interventions have described general practitioner involvement. Outcomes We sought to capture processes or indicators of good-quality care. Data sources Sources were academic databases [including MEDLINE, EMBASE™ (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo® (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA), Web of Science™ (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and Cochrane Collaboration] and grey literature using Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Methods Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines were followed, comprising literature scoping, interviews with general practitioners, iterative searches of academic databases and grey literature, and synthesis and development of overarching programme theories. Results Scoping indicated the distinctiveness of the health and care system in UK and, because quality improvement is context dependent, we decided to focus on UK studies because of potential problems in synthesising across diverse systems. Searches identified 73 articles, of which 43 were excluded. To summarise analysis, programme theory 1 was ‘negotiated working with general practitioners’ where other members of the multidisciplinary team led initiatives and general practitioners provided support with the parts of improvement where their skills as primary care doctors were specifically required. Negotiation enabled matching of the diverse ways of working of general practitioners with diverse care home organisations. We found evidence that this could result in improvements in prescribing and end-of-life care for residents. Programme theory 2 included national or regional programmes that included clearly specified roles for general practitioners. This provided clarity of expectation, but the role that general practitioners actually played in delivery was not clear. Limitations One reviewer screened all search results, but two reviewers conducted selection and data extraction steps. Conclusions If local quality improvement initiatives were flexible, then they could be used to negotiate to build a trusting relationship with general practitioners, with evidence from specific examples, and this could improve prescribing and end-of-life care for residents. Larger improvement programmes aimed to define working patterns and build suitable capacity in care homes, but there was little evidence about the extent of local general practitioner involvement. Future work Future work should describe the specific role, capacity and expertise of general practitioners, as well as the diversity of relationships between general practitioners and care homes. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019137090. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

End of life care for people with dementia: an intervention to promote collaborative working between care home staff and healthcare practitioners

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A23.1-A23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Nicholson ◽  
Claire Goodman ◽  
Elspeth Mathie ◽  
Sarah Amador ◽  
Natasha Baron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Collaborative Working

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on end of life care delivery in care homes: A mixed method systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110298
Author(s):  
Adam Spacey ◽  
Sam Porter ◽  
Michele Board ◽  
Janet Scammell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Impact

Background: Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 is having a negative impact on the delivery of end of life care in care homes around the world. There is a need to collate current evidence to provide a comprehensive overview to assess extent of the problem. Aim: To describe and evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on end of life care delivery in care homes. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis of studies reporting qualitative and quantitative data. Data sources: The databases MEDLINE, psycINFO, SCOPUS and CINAHL were searched between December 2019 and March 2021. Results: Nine studies were included. For care home staff, challenges included significant increases in responsibility and exposure to death, both of which have taken an emotional toll. Results indicate that staff tended not to be offered adequate emotional support or afforded the time to grieve. For those receiving end of life care, results indicate that the end of life care that they tended to receive, especially in the form of advance planning, was disrupted by the pandemic. Conclusion: The effect of the pandemic has been to exacerbate existing problems in the provision of end of life care in care homes for both service providers and users, making that which was previously opaque starkly visible. Future research is needed to explore the effects of the pandemic and its management on those receiving end of life care in care homes and their significant others.

Paying for end of life care in the UK

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (561) ◽  
pp. 495-506
Author(s):  
John Stubbs ◽  
Jacob Adetunji
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Old Age ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Financial Cost ◽  
The Uk

To live to a ripe old age, untroubled by health problems, physical or mental, is an almost universal aspiration. But most people are not so lucky and will likely be in care homes for their final years, with varying levels of disease, disability and dementia. Kinley et al [1] maintain that over a fifth of the population of developed countries die in care homes. Moreover, the financial cost of this end of life care, which is the focus of this paper, can be daunting and require much planning [2]. It was reported in 2017 that, in the UK, care home costs are rising up to twice as fast as inflation [3]. Consequently the question arises about the long term affordability of such care to those having to fund it, a question that ever more people both nationally and globally are having to confront.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document