ASSA13-14-24 The Seasonal Variation of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients Treated with Combination Therapy in CHIEF Trial

Heart ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A65.4-A66
Author(s):  
Su Hai ◽  
Peng Qiang ◽  
Zhang Zhi-hong ◽  
Yang Qing ◽  
Cheng Xiao-shu
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Patricia Fonseca ◽  
Anna F Dominiczak ◽  
Stephen Harrap ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Early combination therapy is more effective for hypertension control in high-risk patients than monotherapy, and current guidelines recommend the use of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for first-line therapy in patients younger than 55 years. Recent evidence shows that ACEIs reduce mortality, whereas ARBs show no apparent benefit despite their blood pressure lowering action. However, it is important to consider which blood pressure parameters should be targeted given that different drugs have distinct effects on key parameters. Remarkably, a high percentage of hypertensive patients whose treatment has brought these parameters within target ranges still remain at high risk of cardiovascular disease due to additional risk factors. Combination therapy with synergistic effects on blood pressure and metabolic control should thus be considered for the long-term treatment of hypertensive patients with co-morbid conditions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (42) ◽  
pp. 1669-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Simonyi ◽  
Tamás Ferenci

Abstract: Introduction: In the treatment of hypertension avoiding adverse cardiovascular complications to achieve target blood pressure is essential. The appropriate drug selection, and if necessary to change to combination therapy, patients adherence is important which may help fixed dose combination. Aim: The aim of the authors was to investigate the one year adherence of the ramipril and ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination in hypertensive patients. Method: Prescriptions database of the National Health Insurance Fund in Hungary on pharmacy-claims was analysed between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013. The authors identified patients who filled prescriptions for ramipril monotherapy and fixed dose combinations of ramipril/amlodipine prescribed for the first time in hypertensive patients who have not received similar drugs in the previous year. To model the adherence, the apparatus of survival analysis was used, where “survival” was the time to abandon the medication. As it was available to month precision, discrete time survival analysis was applied: a generalized linear model was estimated with complementary log-log link function with the kind of drug being the only explanatory variable. Results: 92,546 patients met the inclusion criteria. During the trial period, ramipril therapy or ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination was started in 82,251 and 10,295 patients, respectively. One year persistence rate in patients with ramipril was 30% and 54% in patients with ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy. Considering only the 360-day study period, the mean duration of persistence was 189.9 days in patients on ramipril and 270.6 days on ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy. The hazard of discontinuation was more than twofold higher during treatment with ramipril compared with the use of the ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy (HR = 2.11 [95% CI: 2.05–2.17], p<0,001). Conclusions: There is a significant difference between the one year persistence of ramipril and ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy in hypertension. The result demonstrated that ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy has a better one year persistence rate. When the next step is necessary to achieve target blood pressure, ramipril/amlodipine fixed dose combination therapy is preferable. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(42): 1668–1673.


2012 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. S103 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.F. Akturk ◽  
I. Biyik ◽  
C. Kocas ◽  
A.A. Yalcin ◽  
F. Uzun ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 51 (s3) ◽  
pp. 613s-616s ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Kim

1. The effects of prazosin administered alone or in combination were studied in thirty patients between August 1974 and March 1975. 2. All patients had previously received treatment for hypertension with other agents, for from 2 months to 10 years. All thirty patients had refractory hypertension which had not responded satisfactorily to other treatment. 3. Patients were treated initially with prazosin; polythiazide, or polythiazide plus tolamolol, were added when necessary. 4. A satisfactory blood pressure response to prazosin alone, or prazosin in dual or triple combination therapy, occurred in all thirty patients. 5. Prazosin was well tolerated.


2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
R. Hermida ◽  
D. Ayala ◽  
C. Calvo ◽  
M. Dominguez ◽  
M. Covelo ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. A449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross D Fletcher ◽  
Madhulika Agarwal ◽  
Christopher D McManus ◽  
Vasilios Papademetriou ◽  
Ronald E Jones

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document