scholarly journals Cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wardati Mazlan-Kepli ◽  
Jesse Dawson ◽  
Colin Berry ◽  
Matthew Walters
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

ObjectiveTo assess whether cardiovascular events are increased after cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to explore predictors for recurrent events after DAPT cessation during long-term follow-up.MethodsWe did a retrospective observational cohort study. We included consecutive people with ACS who were discharged from Scottish hospitals between January 2008 and December 2013 and who received DAPT after discharge followed by antiplatelet monotherapy. The rates of cardiovascular events were assessed during each 90-day period of DAPT treatment and 90-day period after stopping DAPT. Cardiovascular events were defined as a composite of death, ACS, transient ischaemic attack or stroke. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of cardiovascular events following DAPT cessation.Results1340 patients were included (62% male, mean age 64.9 (13.0) years). Cardiovascular events occurred in 15.7% (n=211) during the DAPT period (mean DAPT duration 175.1 (155.3) days) and in 16.7% (n=188) following DAPT cessation (mean of 2.7 years follow-up). Independent predictors for a cardiovascular event following DAPT cessation were age (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.08; p<0.001), DAPT duration (HR 0.997; 95% CI 0.995 to 0.998; p<0.001) and having revascularisation therapy during the index admission (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.85; p=0.005).ConclusionsThe rate of cardiovascular events was not significantly increased in the early period post-DAPT cessation compared with later periods in this ACS population. Increasing age, DAPT duration and lack of revascularisation therapy were associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up after DAPT cessation.

scholarly journals Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Antithrombotic Management Patterns and Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the EPICOR Asia Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaoyi Guan ◽  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Mingzi Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Management

Background Long‐term use of antiplatelet agents after acute coronary syndrome in diabetic patients is not well known. Here, we describe antiplatelet use and outcomes in such patients enrolled in the EPICOR Asia (Long‐Term Follow‐up of Antithrombotic Management Patterns in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Asia) registry. Methods and Results EPICOR Asia is a prospective, observational study of 12 922 patients with acute coronary syndrome surviving to discharge, from 8 countries/regions in Asia. The present analysis included 3162 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and 9602 patients without DM. The impact of DM on use of antiplatelet agents and events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, with or without any revascularization; individual components, and bleeding) was evaluated. Significant baseline differences were seen between patients with DM and patients without DM for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular history, angiographic findings, and use of percutaneous coronary intervention. At discharge, ≈90% of patients in each group received dual antiplatelet therapy. At 2‐year follow‐up, more patients with DM tended to still receive dual antiplatelet therapy (60% versus 56%). DM was associated with increased risk from ischemic but not major bleeding events. Independent predictors of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with DM were age ≥65 years and use of diuretics at discharge. Conclusions Antiplatelet agent use is broadly comparable in patients with DM and patients without DM, although patients with DM are more likely to be on dual antiplatelet therapy at 2 years. Patients with DM are at increased risk of ischemic events, suggesting an unmet need for improved antithrombotic treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01361386.

scholarly journals Impact of known or new-onset atrial fibrillation on 2-year cardiovascular event rate in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the prospective EPICOR Registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Zeymer ◽  
Lieven Annemans ◽  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Stuart Pocock ◽  
Simon Newsome ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
New Onset

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity in acute coronary syndrome patients, but impact on outcomes beyond 1 year is unclear. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis from the long-tErm follow-uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients (EPICOR) registry (NCT01171404), a prospective, observational study conducted in Europe and Latin America, which enrolled acute coronary syndrome survivors at discharge. Antithrombotic management patterns, mortality, a composite endpoint of death/new non-fatal myocardial infarction/stroke and bleeding events were assessed after 2 years of follow-up in patients with or without AF. Results: Of 10,568 patients enrolled, 397 (4.7%) had prior AF and 382 (3.6%) new-onset AF during index hospitalisation. Fewer patients with AF underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (52.1% vs. 66.6%; P<0.0001). At discharge, fewer AF patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (71.6% vs. 89.5%; P<0.0001); oral anticoagulant use was higher in AF patients but was still infrequent (35.0% vs. 2.5%; P<0.0001). Use of dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants declined over follow-up with over 50% of all AF/no AF patients remaining on dual antiplatelet therapy (55.6% vs. 60.6%), and 23.3% (new-onset AF) to 42.1% (prior AF) on oral anticoagulants at 2 years. At 2 years, mortality, composite endpoint and bleeding rates were higher in AF patients (all P<0.0001) compared to patients without AF. On multivariable analysis, the risk of mortality or the composite endpoint was significant for prior AF ( P=0.003, P=0.001) but not new-onset AF ( P=0.88, P=0.92). Conclusions: Acute coronary syndrome patients with AF represent a high-risk group with increased event rates during long-term follow-up. Prior AF is an independent predictor of mortality and/or ischaemic events at 2 years. Use of anticoagulants in AF after acute coronary syndrome is still suboptimal.

Prognostic impact of severe anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dL) during treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy after hospital discharge for acute coronary syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Campos ◽  
C Oliveira ◽  
C Pires ◽  
P Medeiros ◽  
R Flores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Severe Anemia ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction In recent years, the use of invasive strategies has become the generalized approach in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), justified by the associated prognostic benefit due to reduced mortality and the evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the benefits of an invasive approach in ACS are unclear in the population with significant anemia, as anemia is strongly associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Aim To determine the ischaemic vs. bleeding risks from patients with severe anemia (hemoglobin &lt;10 g/dL) during treatment with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) after an ACS undergoing PCI. Methods From a national multicentre registry, we analyzed 17 370 ACS pts. Pts were divided into two groups: group 1 - pts with severe anemia (hemoglobin &lt;10g/dL) (n=557, 3.2%); group 2 - pts without severe anemia (hemoglobin 10g/dL) (n=16813, 96.8%). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of a composite of death and adverse cardiovascular events (stroke, reinfarction, and rehospitalization of cardiovascular etiology) at 1 year. Results The sample consisted in 73.4% men and 26.6% women, with mean age of 66±14 years. The incidence of severe anemia was 3.2%. Group 1 pts were older (75±12 vs 66±14, p&lt;0.001), had a higher proportion of women (47.6% vs 25.9%, p&lt;0.001), diabetes (55% vs 30.6%, p&lt;0.001), hypertension (81.8% vs 68.2%, p&lt;0.001) and chronic kidney disease (29.2% vs 5.2%, p&lt;0.001). During hospitalization, group 1 had more heart failure (35.3% vs 15.1%, p&lt;0.001), worst LVEF (27.3% vs 17.3%, p&lt;0,001), bleeding (7.6%% vs 1.3%, p&lt;0.001) and transfusion (23.4% vs 1%, p&lt;0.001). During hospitalization, group 2 pts were more likely to undergo revascularization (82.9% vs 89.4%, p&lt;0.001) and double antiaggregation (82.5% vs 95%, p&lt;0.001). A multivariate analysis identified age [OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.89; p&lt;0.001] and feminine sex [OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.89 to 3.61; p&lt;0.001] as independent predictors of severe anemia during hospitalization. Patients with severe anemia had longer hospital stay (9 days vs 6 days; p&lt;0.001), and higher 6-month mortality (8.7% vs. 2.9%; p&lt;0.001). In multivariate analysis and after adjusting for different baseline characteristics, pts with severe anemia had higher occurrence of a composite of death and adverse cardiovascular events at 1-year compared to those without severe anemia [OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.04; p=0.029]. Conclusion We objected a low prevalence of ACS patients with severe anemia undergoing PCI (52.2%) but the incidence of ICP in these complex patients has increased in recent years, mainly due to the evolution of PCI over the last 40 years. Severe anemia was strongly associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality in ACS pts. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Anticoagulation in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy has no impact on long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of (sub)acute lower limb ischemia

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-329
Author(s):  
Mariya Kronlage ◽  
Erwin Blessing ◽  
Oliver J. Müller ◽  
Britta Heilmeier ◽  
Hugo A. Katus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Summary. Background: To assess the impact of short- vs. long-term anticoagulation in addition to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) upon endovascular treatment of (sub)acute thrombembolic occlusions of the lower extremity. Patient and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 202 patients with a thrombembolic occlusion of lower extremities, followed by crirical limb ischemia that received endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or a combination of both between 2006 and 2015 at a single center. Following antithrombotic regimes were compared: 1) dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT for 4 weeks (aspirin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d) upon intervention, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 2) DAPT plus short term anticoagulation for 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 3) DAPT plus long term anticoagulation for > 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong anticoagulation. Results: Endovascular treatment was associated with high immediate revascularization (> 98 %), as well as overall and amputation-free survival rates (> 85 %), independent from the chosen anticoagulation regime in a two-year follow up, p > 0.05. Anticoagulation in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy had no significant effect on patency or freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) 24 months upon index procedure for both thrombotic and embolic occlusions. Severe bleeding complications occurred more often in the long-term anticoagulation group (9.3 % vs. 5.6 % (short-term group) and 6.5 % (DAPT group), p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our observational study demonstrates that the choice of an antithrombotic regime had no impact on the long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of acute thrombembolic limb ischemia whereas prolonged anticoagulation was associated with a nominal increase in severe bleeding complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document