scholarly journals The characteristics of human papillomavirus DNA in head and neck cancers and papillomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Major
Author(s):  
Chameera Ekanayake Weeramange ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Gunter Hartel ◽  
Yinan Li ◽  
Sarju Vasani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Henry ◽  
Emily Arnovitz ◽  
Saul Frenkiel ◽  
Michael Hier ◽  
Anthony Zeitouni ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 802-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Habbous ◽  
Luke T. G. Harland ◽  
Anthony La Delfa ◽  
Ehab Fadhel ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koh Jun Ong ◽  
Marta Checchi ◽  
Lorna Burns ◽  
Charlotte Pavitt ◽  
Maarten J Postma ◽  
...  

BackgroundMany economic evaluations of human papillomavirus vaccination should ideally consider multiple disease outcomes, including anogenital warts, respiratory papillomatosis and non-cervical cancers (eg, anal, oropharyngeal, penile, vulvar and vaginal cancers). However, published economic evaluations largely relied on estimates from single studies or informal rapid literature reviews.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of articles up to June 2016 to identify costs and utility estimates admissible for an economic evaluation from a single-payer healthcare provider’s perspective. Meta-analyses were performed for studies that used same utility elicitation tools for similar diseases. Costs were adjusted to 2016/2017 US$.ResultsSixty-one papers (35 costs; 24 utilities; 2 costs and utilities) were selected from 10 742 initial records. Cost per case ranges were US$124–US$883 (anogenital warts), US$6912–US$52 579 (head and neck cancers), US$12 936–US$51 571 (anal cancer), US$17 524–34 258 (vaginal cancer), US$14 686–US$28 502 (vulvar cancer) and US$9975–US$27 629 (penile cancer). The total cost for 14 adult patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis was US$137 601 (one paper).Utility per warts episode ranged from 0.651 to 1 (12 papers, various utility elicitation methods), with pooled mean EQ-5D and EQ-VAS of 0.86 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.87) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.75), respectively. Fifteen papers reported utilities in head and neck cancers with range 0.29 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.76) to 0.94 (95% CI 0.3 to 1.0). Mean utility reported ranged from 0.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.61) to 0.65 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.75) (anal cancer), 0.59 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.64) (vaginal cancer), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.70) (vulvar cancer) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.84) (penile cancer).ConclusionsDifferences in values reported from each paper reflect variations in cancer site, disease stages, study population, treatment modality/setting and utility elicitation methods used. As patient management changes over time, corresponding effects on both costs and utility need to be considered to ensure health economic assumptions are up-to-date and closely reflect the case mix of patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 181 (8) ◽  
pp. 415-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara R Rose ◽  
Christopher J O'Brien ◽  
Wei Li

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atang Bulane ◽  
Dominique Goedhals ◽  
Riaz Y. Seedat ◽  
Jacqueline Goedhals ◽  
Felicity Burt

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M.L. Brotherton ◽  
Alicia N. Stein ◽  
E. Lynne Conway ◽  
David G. Regan ◽  
Andrew Grulich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document