scholarly journals Primary care endometrial sampling for abnormal uterine bleeding: a pilot study

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon M Dickson ◽  
Brigitte Delaney ◽  
Mary E Connor
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Large City ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
First Year ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Endometrial Sampling ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
General Practices ◽  
The Uk

AimTo design and evaluate a pilot service for primary care endometrial sampling (PCES).DesignRetrospective analysis of data from two service evaluations.SettingGeneral practices and the gynaecology department in a large city in the UK.MethodsThese were two-fold: (1) To design the new service we identified all the endometrial samples taken in the city’s gynaecology department in 2012/2013 and estimated the proportion of these with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that would be suitable for PCES. (2) To evaluate the new PCES service we analysed data from the first year of activity.Results(1) A total of 1894 endometrial samples were taken in hospital in 2012/2013. An estimated 424 (22.4%) of these were from patients with AUB who fitted the criteria for PCES. (2) In the first year of the PCES service 108 samples were taken by general practitioners (GPs). Initial management of these patients was exclusively in primary care in 97.2% (104/108) of cases; most patients were treated with the Mirena intrauterine system (79/109; 73.1%) and there were no cases of hyperplasia or cancer.ConclusionsMost premenopausal patients with AUB could potentially be managed in primary care without referral to hospital if endometrial sampling (ES) was made available to appropriately trained and supported GPs. However, this study was limited by its retrospective, non-interventional design, and more research is required to demonstrate safety and cost-effectiveness.

scholarly journals Real-world presentation with heart failure in primary care: do patients selected to follow diagnostic and management guidelines have better outcomes?

Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000935
Author(s):  
Alex Bottle ◽  
Dani Kim ◽  
Paul P Aylin ◽  
F Azeem Majeed ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Specialist Referral ◽  
Partial Completion ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Using Data

ObjectiveTo describe associations between initial management of people presenting with heart failure (HF) symptoms in primary care, including compliance with the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and subsequent unplanned hospitalisation for HF and death.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using data from general practices submitting records to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The cohort comprised patients diagnosed with HF during 2010–2013 and presenting to their general practitioners with breathlessness, fatigue or ankle swelling.Results13 897 patients were included in the study. Within the first 6 months, only 7% had completed the NICE-recommended pathway; another 18.6% had followed part of it (B-type natriuretic peptide testing and/or echocardiography, or specialist referral). Significant differences in hazards were seen in unadjusted analysis in favour of full or partial completion of the NICE-recommended pathway. Covariate adjustment attenuated the relations with death much more than those for HF admission. Compared with patients placed on the NICE pathway, treatment with HF medications had an HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, p=0.003) for HF admission and 1.03 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.17, p= 0.674) for death. Patients who partially followed the NICE pathway had similar hazards to those who completed it. Patients on no pathway had the highest hazard for HF admission at 1.30 (95% 1.18 to 1.43, p<0.001) but similar hazard for death.ConclusionsPatients not put on at least some elements of the NICE-recommended pathway had significantly higher risk of HF admission but non-significant higher risk of death than other patients had.

scholarly journals Histopathological evaluation of endometrial sampling in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3180
Author(s):  
Bhavani L. Nair ◽  
Lency S. Kuriakose
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Menstrual Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Sampling ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Perimenopausal Women ◽  
Proliferative Endometrium ◽  
Secretory Endometrium

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the common symptoms in the gynaecology outpatient department. About one third of women are affected at some time in their lives. The perimenopausal women show significant number of underlying organic pathology. The evaluation of endometrium and/or organ histopathology has the dual advantage of finding the cause of AUB and to rule out endometrial cancer or the potential for cancer in future like endometrial hyperplasia with atypia. The aim of the study was to determine the histopathological pattern of endometrial sampling in perimenopausal women with AUB and to follow them up for a period of six months after the procedure.Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation, Venjaramood, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, for a period of one year from December 2019 to December 2020. The study was conducted on 116 perimenopausal women 41-52 years who presented with AUB and had undergone endometrial sampling. These ladies were subsequently followed up for six months post procedure to assess the response to medical treatment or the need for any surgical intervention like hysterectomy.Results: A total 39.65% patients had heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding and 18.16% patients had irregular bleeding. 14.65% patients had prolonged flow, 8.6% had heavy flow, 6.8% had infrequent with prolonged flow, 6% had prolonged, infrequent with heavy bleeding. Non-structural (COEIN) causes contributed to about 60.4% of AUB in perimenopausal women and 39.6% had structural (PALM) causes. 49% cases were secretory endometrium. 29.3% had disordered proliferative endometrium, 4.3% had proliferative endometrium, 5.2% each had polyp or hyperplasia without atypia. 18 (15.5%) cases underwent hysterectomy, 3 patients who had adenocarcinoma underwent staging laparotomy, 2 patients had LNG IUS insertion and 40 patients were on follow up requiring either no treatment and 53 (45.68%) patients were given antifibrinolytics or hormonal therapy.Conclusions: Heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding was the most common presenting symptom. COEIN contributed to about 60.4% of cases. Evaluation of the endometrium showed that, secretory endometrium was commonest (49%) followed by disordered proliferative endometrium (29.3%). On follow up for six months, 15.5% patients underwent hysterectomy, 2 patients had insertion of levonorgestrel IUD, 45.68% patients had medical management with antifibrinolytics or hormones and were on follow up. The responsibility of gynaecologist in the management of AUB in perimenopausal women is to exclude hyperplasia of endometrium and endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Co-relation of endometrial thickness by transvaginal sonogram with histopathology pattern in abnormal uterine bleeding: a study from South India

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1416
Author(s):  
Chippy Tess Mathew ◽  
Uma Maheswari ◽  
Karthikeyan Shanmugam
Keyword(s):  
Precancerous Lesions ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Sampling ◽  
Dilatation And Curettage ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Fourth Decade ◽  
Proliferative Endometrium

Background: Under normal circumstances, a woman's uterus sheds a limited amount of blood during each menstrual period (around 80 ml). Bleeding that occurs erratically or excessive menstrual bleeding is called abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). The causes of AUB are many and varied. Initial investigations include transvaginal ultrasound and histopathologic assessment of the endometrium. Objective of this study was to evaluation of endometrial thickness with trans-vaginal ultrasound and its correlation with histopathology by dilatation and curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding. To determine the efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluating the endometrial thickness. To correlate the endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasound with endometrial histopathology in women with AUB.Methods: It is a retrospective observational study. All reproductive and perimenopausal age group women who underwent dilatation and curettage for abnormal uterine bleeding during the period June 2014-June 2016 was taken and analyzed and correlated with their endometrial thickness measured with Transvaginal ultrasound.Results: Around 478 patients who underwent endometrial sampling over a period of two years were analyzed. Maximum number of patients were in the fourth decade and the overweight category 36.6%. Proliferative endometrium was the most common histopathologic picture (44.76%). Detection of precancerous lesions were-5.87% and endometrial cancer was 1.05%.Conclusions: An ET of 8 mm and above gave 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for precancerous and cancerous lesions.

scholarly journals Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shazia Fakhar ◽  
Gulshan Saeed ◽  
Amir Hussain Khan ◽  
Ali Yawar Alam
Keyword(s):  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Sampling

scholarly journals A prospective study on the efficacy of Pipelle biopsy to diagnose endometrial pathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4238
Author(s):  
Sunitha Mary Mathew ◽  
Pramod Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Endometrial Biopsy ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Atypical Hyperplasia ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Endometrial Sampling ◽  
Endometrial Pathology

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the most common problem encountered in gynaecology clinics. Assessment of endometrial pathology is recommended to rule out malignancy and premalignant conditions. Endometrial sampling can be done by Pipelle biopsy in outpatient units as well as by conventional dilatation and curettage in an operation theatre setup. Our study aims to find out the efficacy of office endometrial biopsy in terms of its sample adequacy, diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptability.Methods: 120 women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding were included. A detailed history along with clinical examination findings are entered in the proforma. Ultrasound scan was done for all of them to identify pelvic pathology and endometrial thickness. Endometrial sampling was then done with Pipelle without anaesthesia. Histopathology reports are collected and sample adequacy and pattern were analysed. Patients are subsequently followed up for a period up to one year. Those who underwent hysterectomy are analysed for the endometrial pathology in hysterectomy specimen which is used as gold standard and compared with Pipelle endometrial sampling histopathology.Results: Sample adequacy for Pipelle biopsy was found to be 96%. Diagnostic accuracy for atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma is 92.5% and 94% respectively. In hysterectomy specimens, carcinoma endometrium coexisted with atypical hyperplasia in 40% of cases with atypical hyperplasia in pipelle biopsy report.Conclusions: Thus, Pipelle endometrial biopsy is a cost-effective method for endometrial sampling except for focal lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document