scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of adjunctive lacosamide in the treatment of primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 1067-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G Vossler ◽  
Susanne Knake ◽  
Terence J O'Brien ◽  
Masako Watanabe ◽  
Melissa Brock ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of lacosamide (up to 12 mg/kg/day or 400 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in patients (≥4 years) with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE).MethodsPhase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (SP0982; NCT02408523) in patients with IGE and PGTCS taking 1–3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Primary outcome was time to second PGTCS during 24-week treatment.Results242 patients were randomised and received ≥1 dose of trial medication (lacosamide/placebo: n=121/n=121). Patients (mean age: 27.7 years; 58.7% female) had a history of generalised-onset seizures (tonic-clonic 99.6%; myoclonic 38.8%; absence 37.2%). Median treatment duration with lacosamide/placebo was 143/65 days. Risk of developing a second PGTCS during 24-week treatment was significantly lower with lacosamide than placebo (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 55.27%/33.37%; HR 0.540, 95% CI 0.377 to 0.774; p<0.001; n=118/n=121). Median time to second PGTCS could not be estimated for lacosamide (>50% of patients did not experience a second PGTCS) and was 77.0 days for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from PGTCS at end of the 24-week treatment period (day 166) for lacosamide/placebo was 31.3%/17.2% (difference 14.1%; p=0.011). More patients on lacosamide than placebo had ≥50% (68.1%/46.3%) or ≥75% (57.1%/36.4%) reduction from baseline in PGTCS frequency/28 days, or observed freedom from PGTCS during treatment (27.5%/13.2%) (n=119/n=121). 96/121 (79.3%) patients on lacosamide had treatment-emergent adverse events (placebo 79/121 (65.3%)), most commonly dizziness (23.1%), somnolence (16.5%), headache (14.0%). No patients died during the trial.ConclusionsLacosamide was efficacious and generally safe as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled PGTCS in patients with IGE.

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Yiannakou ◽  
Michel Bouchoucha ◽  
Ingolf Schiefke ◽  
Hubert Piessevaux ◽  
Rafal Filip ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A323.2-A324
Author(s):  
Y Yiannakou ◽  
M Bouchoucha ◽  
I Schiefke ◽  
H Piessevaux ◽  
R Filip ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. AB400
Author(s):  
Stacie M. Jones ◽  
Kirsten Beyer ◽  
A. Wesley Burks ◽  
Thomas B. Casale ◽  
Jonathan O'B. Hourihane ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C Goldberg ◽  
Maciej Banach ◽  
Alberico L Catapano ◽  
P Barton Duell ◽  
Lawrence A Leiter ◽  
...  

Introduction: Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor, lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Objective: To report efficacy and safety of BA by sex in patients with elevated LDL-C. Methods: Data were pooled from 4 phase 3 randomized (2:1), double-blind studies investigating oral BA (180 mg once daily) vs placebo for 12 weeks to 52 weeks in adults receiving maximally tolerated statins who required additional LDL-C lowering, analyzed by sex. The primary efficacy endpoint was % change in LDL-C from baseline to week 12. Results were analyzed in cohorts with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (“ASCVD/HeFH on statins pool”, n=3009) or history of statin intolerance (“statin intolerant pool”, n=614). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Of all participants, 34.3% were women. Significant LDL-C lowering from baseline with BA vs placebo was demonstrated in both pools and sexes ( P < 0.001; Table 1 ), with greater lowering in women vs men in the ASCVD/HeFH on statins pool ( P = 0.04). Rates of TEAEs were similar across groups ( Table 2 ). Rates of common TEAEs were similar in both pools and sexes, except urinary tract infection (men: BA, 2.8%; placebo, 3.0%; women: BA, 8.0%; placebo, 10.3%) and pain in extremity (men: BA, 2.5%; placebo, 1.2%; women: BA, 4.2%; placebo, 2.9%), which occurred more frequently in women. Conclusion: BA lowered LDL-C significantly in both women and men, with greater effect in women vs men in both pools, and a safety profile generally comparable to placebo in both sexes.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 2528-2536
Author(s):  
Serge A. Jabbour ◽  
Juan P. Frías ◽  
Azazuddin Ahmed ◽  
Elise Hardy ◽  
Jasmine Choi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document