atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2115
(FIVE YEARS 1315)

H-INDEX

67
(FIVE YEARS 18)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samit Ghosal ◽  
◽  
Binayak Sinha

Review question / Objective: P (patient population) = Type 2 diabetes patients with high CV risk or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; I (intervention) = Received drugs: GLP1-RA; C (control group) = Compared to a control group that received a placebo; O (outcome) = Outcomes of interest included primary CV outcomes (MACE, CV death, MI, and Stroke). Condition being studied: To explore whether the heterogeneity associated with the primary outcomes benefits can be attributed to the metabolic improvements associated with GLP1-RA. The plan is to use HBA1c, weight, and SBP reduction as moderators attempting to explain any variance between the true and observed effect size.


Author(s):  
Gurleen Kaur ◽  
Karan P. Desai ◽  
Isabella Y. Chang ◽  
Jonathan D. Newman ◽  
Roy O. Mathew ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261986
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Guowei Zhou ◽  
Yawei Zheng ◽  
Dan Lv ◽  
Xiangjun Zhu ◽  
...  

Introduction After stage 3 CKD, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increased significantly. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with different baseline kidney function or underlying diseases. Method To identify eligible trials, we systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021. The primary cardiovascular outcome was defined as a combination of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. Baseline kidney functions (stage 3a CKD: eGFR45-59mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 3b CKD: eGFR30-44mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 4 CKD: eGFR<30mL/min per 1.73m2) and underlying diseases (Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (Preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) were used to stratify efficacy and safety outcomes. The results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis to ensure that they were reliable. Results In the present study, a total of eleven trials were included that involved a total of 27,823 patients with stage 3/4 CKD. The treatment and control groups contained 14,451 and 13,372 patients, respectively. In individuals with stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes by 26% (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.69–0.80], I2 = 0.00%), by 30% in patients with stage 3a CKD (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.59–0.84], I2 = 18.70%), by 23% in patients with stage 3b CKD (HR 0.77, [95% CI 0.66–0.90], I2 = 2.12%), and by 29% in patients with stage 4 CKD (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.53–0.96], I2 = 0.00%). The risk of primary outcomes was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.63–0.80], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with type 2 diabetes, by 28% (HR 0.72, [95% CI 0.56–0.93], I2 = 37.23%) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, by 21% (HR 0.79, [95% CI 0.70–0.89], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and by 25% (HR 0.75, [95% CI 0.64–0.88], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Conclusions For stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, and these benefits were consistent throughout the spectrum of different kidney functions, even in stage 4 CKD. There was no evidence of increased adverse outcomes across different baseline clinical complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Mahtta ◽  
David J. Ramsey ◽  
Michelle T. Lee ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Mahmoud Al Rifai ◽  
...  

<i>Objective:</i> There is mounting evidence regarding the cardiovascular (CV) benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) and glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). There is paucity of data assessing real-world practice patterns for these drug classes. We aimed to assess utilization rates of these drug classes and facility-level variation in their utilization. <p> </p> <p><i>Research Design and Methods:</i> We used the nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system dataset from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and included patients with established ASCVD and T2DM. Among these patients, we assessed the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA and the facility-level variation in their utilization. Facility-level variation was computed using median rate ratios (MRR), a measure of likelihood that two random facilities differ in use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in patients with ASCVD and T2DM. </p> <p> </p> <p><i>Results:</i> Among 537,980 patients with ASCVD and T2DM across 130 VA facilities, 11.2% of patients received SGLT2i while 8.0% of patients received GLP-1RA. Patients receiving these cardioprotective glucose-lowering drug classes were on average younger and had a higher proportion of non-Hispanic Whites. Overall, median (10<sup>th</sup>-90<sup>th</sup> percentile) facility-level rates were 14.92% (9.31%-22.50%) for SGLT2i and 10.88% (4.44%-17.07%) for GLP-1RA. There was significant facility level variation among SGLT2-Is utilization - MRR<sub>unadjusted</sub> (95% CI):1.41 (1.35-1.47) and MRR<sub>adjusted</sub> (95% CI): 1.55 (1.46 – 1.63). Similar facility level variation was observed for utilization of GLP-1 RA – MRR<sub>unadjusted</sub> (95% CI):1.34 (1.29-1.38) and MRR<sub>adjusted </sub>(95% CI): 1.78 (1.65 – 1.90).</p> <p> </p> <p><i>Conclusions:</i> Overall utilization rates of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA among eligible patients are low with significantly higher residual facility-level variation in utilization of these drug classes. Our results suggest opportunities to optimize their use to prevent future adverse cardiovascular events among these patients. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avivit Cahn ◽  
Stephen D. Wiviott ◽  
Ofri Mosenzon ◽  
Sabina A. Murphy ◽  
Erica L. Goodrich ◽  
...  

<b>Objective:</b> Current guidelines recommend prescribing SGLT-2 inhibitors to patients with type 2 diabetes and established or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), irrespective of HbA1c levels. We studied the association of HbA1c with cardiovascular and renal outcomes and whether the benefit of dapagliflozin varies by baseline HbA1c. <p><b>Methods:</b> In the Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events (DECLARE)-TIMI 58 trial 17,160 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo for a median follow up of 4.2 years. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes by baseline HbA1c in the overall population, and with dapagliflozin vs. placebo in HbA1c subgroups were studied by Cox regression models.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> In the overall population, increasing HbA1c was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (CVD/HHF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; CVD, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and of the cardiorenal outcome (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.12 [1.06-1.19], 1.08 [1.04-1.13] and 1.17 [1.11-1.24] per 1% increase respectively). Elevated HbA1c was associated with an increased risk for MACE and for the cardiorenal outcome significantly more in patients with multiple risk factors (MRF), vs. patients with established ASCVD (P-interaction 0.0064 and 0.0093 respectively). Dapagliflozin led to a decrease in the risk of CVD/HHF, HHF and the cardiorenal outcome vs. placebo with no heterogeneity by baseline HbA1c (P-interaction >0.05).</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: High HbA1c levels were associated with greater cardiovascular and renal risk, particularly in the MRF population, yet the benefits of dapagliflozin were observed in all subgroups irrespective of baseline HbA1c, including patients with HbA1c<7%.</p>


Author(s):  
Laura Jayne Corbin ◽  
Stephen J White ◽  
Amy Taylor ◽  
Christopher Michael Williams ◽  
Kurt Taylor ◽  
...  

Background: DNA hypomethylation at the F2RL3 locus has been associated with both smoking and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; whether these smoking-related associations form a pathway to disease is unknown. F2RL3 encodes protease-activated receptor 4, a potent thrombin receptor expressed on platelets. Given the role of thrombin in platelet activation and the role of thrombus formation in myocardial infarction, alterations to this biological pathway could be important for ischemic cardiovascular disease. Methods: We conducted multiple independent experiments to assess whether DNA hypomethylation at F2RL3 in response to smoking is associated with risk of myocardial infarction via changes to platelet reactivity. Using cohort data (N=3,205), we explored the relationship between smoking, DNA hypomethylation at F2RL3 and myocardial infarction. We compared platelet reactivity in individuals with low versus high DNA methylation at F2RL3 (N=41). We used an in vitro model to explore the biological response of F2RL3 to cigarette smoke extract (CSE). Finally, a series of reporter constructs were used to investigate how differential methylation could impact F2RL3 gene expression. Results: Observationally, DNA methylation at F2RL3 mediated an estimated 34% of the smoking effect on increased risk of myocardial infarction. An association between methylation group (low/high) and platelet reactivity was observed in response to PAR4 stimulation. In cells, CSE exposure was associated with a 4.9 to 9.3% reduction in DNA methylation at F2RL3 and a corresponding 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2, 2.4, p=0.04) fold increase in F2RL3 mRNA. Results from reporter assays suggest the exon 2 region of F2RL3 may help control gene expression. Conclusions: Smoking-induced epigenetic DNA hypomethylation at F2RL3 appears to increase PAR4 expression with potential downstream consequences for platelet reactivity. Combined evidence here not only identifies F2RL3 DNA methylation as a possible contributory pathway from smoking to cardiovascular disease risk, but from any feature potentially influencing F2RL3 regulation in a similar manner.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Mahtta ◽  
David J. Ramsey ◽  
Michelle T. Lee ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Mahmoud Al Rifai ◽  
...  

<i>Objective:</i> There is mounting evidence regarding the cardiovascular (CV) benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) and glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). There is paucity of data assessing real-world practice patterns for these drug classes. We aimed to assess utilization rates of these drug classes and facility-level variation in their utilization. <p> </p> <p><i>Research Design and Methods:</i> We used the nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system dataset from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and included patients with established ASCVD and T2DM. Among these patients, we assessed the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA and the facility-level variation in their utilization. Facility-level variation was computed using median rate ratios (MRR), a measure of likelihood that two random facilities differ in use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in patients with ASCVD and T2DM. </p> <p> </p> <p><i>Results:</i> Among 537,980 patients with ASCVD and T2DM across 130 VA facilities, 11.2% of patients received SGLT2i while 8.0% of patients received GLP-1RA. Patients receiving these cardioprotective glucose-lowering drug classes were on average younger and had a higher proportion of non-Hispanic Whites. Overall, median (10<sup>th</sup>-90<sup>th</sup> percentile) facility-level rates were 14.92% (9.31%-22.50%) for SGLT2i and 10.88% (4.44%-17.07%) for GLP-1RA. There was significant facility level variation among SGLT2-Is utilization - MRR<sub>unadjusted</sub> (95% CI):1.41 (1.35-1.47) and MRR<sub>adjusted</sub> (95% CI): 1.55 (1.46 – 1.63). Similar facility level variation was observed for utilization of GLP-1 RA – MRR<sub>unadjusted</sub> (95% CI):1.34 (1.29-1.38) and MRR<sub>adjusted </sub>(95% CI): 1.78 (1.65 – 1.90).</p> <p> </p> <p><i>Conclusions:</i> Overall utilization rates of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA among eligible patients are low with significantly higher residual facility-level variation in utilization of these drug classes. Our results suggest opportunities to optimize their use to prevent future adverse cardiovascular events among these patients. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avivit Cahn ◽  
Stephen D. Wiviott ◽  
Ofri Mosenzon ◽  
Sabina A. Murphy ◽  
Erica L. Goodrich ◽  
...  

<b>Objective:</b> Current guidelines recommend prescribing SGLT-2 inhibitors to patients with type 2 diabetes and established or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), irrespective of HbA1c levels. We studied the association of HbA1c with cardiovascular and renal outcomes and whether the benefit of dapagliflozin varies by baseline HbA1c. <p><b>Methods:</b> In the Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events (DECLARE)-TIMI 58 trial 17,160 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo for a median follow up of 4.2 years. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes by baseline HbA1c in the overall population, and with dapagliflozin vs. placebo in HbA1c subgroups were studied by Cox regression models.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> In the overall population, increasing HbA1c was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (CVD/HHF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; CVD, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and of the cardiorenal outcome (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.12 [1.06-1.19], 1.08 [1.04-1.13] and 1.17 [1.11-1.24] per 1% increase respectively). Elevated HbA1c was associated with an increased risk for MACE and for the cardiorenal outcome significantly more in patients with multiple risk factors (MRF), vs. patients with established ASCVD (P-interaction 0.0064 and 0.0093 respectively). Dapagliflozin led to a decrease in the risk of CVD/HHF, HHF and the cardiorenal outcome vs. placebo with no heterogeneity by baseline HbA1c (P-interaction >0.05).</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: High HbA1c levels were associated with greater cardiovascular and renal risk, particularly in the MRF population, yet the benefits of dapagliflozin were observed in all subgroups irrespective of baseline HbA1c, including patients with HbA1c<7%.</p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avivit Cahn ◽  
Stephen D. Wiviott ◽  
Ofri Mosenzon ◽  
Erica L. Goodrich ◽  
Sabina A. Murphy ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Current guidelines recommend prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors to patients with type 2 diabetes and established or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), irrespective of HbA1c levels. We studied the association of HbA1c with cardiovascular and renal outcomes and whether the benefit of dapagliflozin varies by baseline HbA1c. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events trial (DECLARE-TIMI 58), 17,160 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to dapagliflozin or placebo for a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes by baseline HbA1c in the overall population and with dapagliflozin versus placebo in HbA1c subgroups were studied by Cox regression models. RESULTS In the overall population, higher baseline HbA1c was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke; and cardiorenal outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios 1.12 [95% CI 1.06–1.19], 1.08 [1.04–1.13], and 1.17 [1.11–1.24] per 1% higher level, respectively). Elevated HbA1c was associated with a greater increased risk for MACE and cardiorenal outcomes in patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) than in established ASCVD (P-interaction = 0.0064 and 0.0093, respectively). Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin decreased the risk of cardiovascular death/HHF, HHF, and cardiorenal outcomes, with no heterogeneity by baseline HbA1c (P-interaction &gt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Higher HbA1c levels were associated with greater cardiovascular and renal risk, particularly in the MRF population, yet the benefits of dapagliflozin were observed in all subgroups irrespective of baseline HbA1c, including patients with HbA1c &lt;7%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document