scholarly journals 10 minutes with Dr Claire Dewsnap, consultant in genitourinary medicine at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals

BMJ Leader ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-261
Author(s):  
Grace Webster ◽  
Claire Dewsnap
1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 567-570
Author(s):  
Mohsen Shahmanesh ◽  
Charles Lacey

We aimed to investigate the extent of genitourinary medicine (GUM) involvement in the clinical management of HIV. A questionnaire survey was conducted on GUM consultants in the UK and the Irish Republic. Clinics were divided into teaching hospitals (THs) undertaking both undergraduate and postgraduate training in GUM, non-teaching training (NTT) centres undertaking specialist training only and non-teaching (NT) centres. Information was obtained on 241 of the 250 consultants on the Royal College of Physician's GUM Committee's records from 117 GUM clinics (including all THs and NTT centres). Four (1 TH and 2 NTT centres) GUM clinics did not see HIV-positive patients, 62 saw 10-99 patients, 18 reported 100-999 and 4 with over 1000 patients attending in 1996. Thirty-five per cent of the 55 THs and NTT centres had over 100 HIV patients. Consultants were involved in the outpatient care of HIV patients in 99.5% and GUM trainees in 85.5% clinics. Overall 47 clinics have their own inpatient HIV beds and 176 consultants (73%) had full (100) or significant (76) input to inpatient HIV management. Only 29% of THs and 12.5% of NTT centres had none or minor input into HIV care. HIV inpatient on-call commitment by the GUM trainees was reported by 64% of training centres. GUM services provide a major input into outpatient and inpatient care of HIV-infected patients in the UK.


Author(s):  
Wafa A K Abbas ◽  
Muntahaa Rashaan

Literatures proved that Hand hygiene is the most important and effective infection prevention and control measure to prevent the spread of microorganisms causing HAIs and improving hand hygiene is consider a vital intervention to promote optimum patient safety in delivery room. Aim of the study; This study conducted to assess hand hygiene practices of health care personnel in the delivery room at the middle Euphrates teaching hospitals. Methods; A Descriptive qusi-expremental research design begin in 20th February to 26th May 2016, Current study sample involve all midwives and physicians in the delivery room (Total coverage.). Questionnaire used for data collection by interview forms and observational checklist was obtain from the extensive review of relevant literature and related studies Data analyzed through utilize (SPSS) software version (16) where, included descriptive analysis and inferential data analysis. The study conducted among 37 physicians and 97 midwives working in the delivery room are females. The current study indicate that the overall evaluation for the health staff practices regarding hand hygiene is fair at Karbala, Al-Najaf, Babylon and Diwaniah with high difference in health staff practices regarding infection control precautions (hand hygiene) and the different studied governorates at pvalue 0.001. based on the finding of present study majority of health care personnel have fair applies related to hand hygiene practices at different studied governorate hospitals. Updating practice of health care personnel through continuing inservice educational programs. Regular inspection and follow-up from the ministry of health for assurances good hand hygiene, the important of exist motivation system and punishment system to the neglected health care personnel.


Pathology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mon M. Chia ◽  
Jenifer M. Langman ◽  
Robert Hecker ◽  
Wendy Y.C. Lew ◽  
Robert Rowland ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-721
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dallas ◽  
Chevis N. Shannon ◽  
Christopher M. Bonfield

OBJECTIVESpinal fusion is used in the treatment of pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) to improve spine alignment and delay disease progression. However, patients with NMS are often medically complex and require a higher level of care than those with other types of scoliosis, leading to higher treatment costs. The purpose of this study was to 1) characterize the cost of pediatric NMS fusion in the US and 2) determine hospital characteristics associated with changes in overall cost.METHODSPatients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (2012 to the first 3 quarters of 2015). Inclusion criteria selected for patients with NMS, spinal fusion of at least 4 vertebral levels, and elective hospitalization. Patients with no cost information were excluded. Sociodemographics, treating hospital characteristics, disease etiology/severity, comorbidities, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Univariable analysis and multivariable gamma log-link regression were used to determine hospital characteristics associated with changes in cost.RESULTSA total of 1780 weighted patients met inclusion criteria. The median cost was $68,815. Following multivariable regression, both small (+$11,580, p < 0.001) and medium (+$6329, p < 0.001) hospitals had higher costs than large hospitals. Rural hospitals had higher costs than urban teaching hospitals (+$32,438, p < 0.001). Nonprofit hospitals were more expensive than both government (–$4518, p = 0.030) and investor-owned (–$10,240, p = 0.001) hospitals. There was significant variability by US census division; compared with the South Atlantic, all other divisions except for the Middle Atlantic had significantly higher costs, most notably the West North Central (+$15,203, p < 0.001) and the Pacific (+$22,235, p < 0.001). Hospital fusion volume was not associated with total cost.CONCLUSIONSA number of hospital factors were associated with changes in fusion cost. Larger hospitals may be able to achieve decreased costs due to economies of scale. Regional differences could reflect uncontrolled-for variability in underlying patient populations or systems-level and policy differences. Overall, this analysis identified multiple systemic patterns that could be targets of further cost-related interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document