Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 824-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni C Saad ◽  
Bruce Philip Blackshaw ◽  
Daniel Rodger

Florence Ashley has argued that requiring patients with gender dysphoria to undergo an assessment and referral from a mental health professional before undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is unethical and may represent an unconscious hostility towards transgender people. We respond, first, by showing that Ashley has conflated the self-reporting of symptoms with self-diagnosis, and that this is not consistent with the standard model of informed consent to medical treatment. Second, we note that the model of informed consent involved in cosmetic surgery resembles the model Ashley defends, and that psychological assessment and referral is recognised as an important aspect of such a model. Third, we suggest that the increased prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in the transgender population arguably supports the requirement of assessment and referral from a mental health professional prior to undergoing HRT.

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 480-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Ashley

Although informed consent models for prescribing hormone replacement therapy are becoming increasingly prevalent, many physicians continue to require an assessment and referral letter from a mental health professional prior to prescription. Drawing on personal and communal experience, the author argues that assessment and referral requirements are dehumanising and unethical, foregrounding the ways in which these requirements evidence a mistrust of trans people, suppress the diversity of their experiences and sustain an unjustified double standard in contrast to other forms of clinical care. Physicians should abandon this unethical requirement in favour of an informed consent approach to transgender care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 826-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Ashley

In a previous article, I argued that assessment requirements for transgender hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are unethical and dehumanising. A recent response published by the Journal of Medical Ethics criticises this proposal. In this reply, I advance that their response misunderstood core parts of my argument and fails to provide independent support for assessment requirements. Though transition-related care may have similarities with cosmetic surgeries, this does not suffice to establish a need for assessments, and nor do the high rates of depression and anxiety justify assessments, especially given the protective role HRT plays towards mental well-being.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy D. Baldo ◽  
Mercedes K. Schneider ◽  
Marty Slyter

The purpose of this article is to present a brief, informative view of the impact of menopause along with implications for mental health counselors. Menopause and associated stages are defined; symptoms associated with these stages are discussed; the benefits, risks and consequences of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are considered; and recommendations for mental health counselors are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document