scholarly journals Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Cwik

Design of clinical trials for germline gene editing stretches current accepted standards for human subjects research. Among the challenges involved is a set of issues concerning intergenerational monitoring—long-term follow-up study of subjects and their descendants. Because changes made at the germline would be heritable, germline gene editing could have adverse effects on individuals’ health that can be passed on to future generations. Determining whether germline gene editing is safe and effective for clinical use thus may require intergenerational monitoring. The aim of this paper is to identify and argue for the significance of a set of ethical issues raised by intergenerational monitoring in future clinical trials of germline gene editing. Though long-term, multigenerational follow-up study of this kind is not without precedent, intergenerational monitoring in this context raises unique ethical challenges, challenges that go beyond existing protocols and standards for human subjects research. These challenges will need to be addressed if clinical trials of germline gene editing are ever pursued.

2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106095
Author(s):  
Austen Yeager

As research involving gene editing continues to advance, we are headed in the direction of being able to modify the human germline. Should we reach a point where an argument can be made that the benefits of preventing unborn children and future generations from inheriting genetic conditions that cause tremendous suffering outweigh the risks associated with altering the human germline, the next step will be to design clinical trials using this technology in humans. These clinical trials will likely require careful follow-up and monitoring of future generations born with altered genes. This paper addresses some of the ethical issues raised by intergenerational monitoring and sets out to show that these issues can be avoided with careful consideration and clinical trial design.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-526
Author(s):  
Yoshizo Asano ◽  
Sadao Suga ◽  
Tetsushi Yoshikawa ◽  
Ikuko Kobayashi ◽  
Takehiko Yazaki ◽  
...  

Since the first report on the development of a live attenuated varicella vaccine in 1974, the vaccine has been studied extensively, with largely favorable results, in both healthy and leukemic children. It is now licensed in Japan, Korea, and some European countries, and is being considered for licensure in the United States. Although various clinical trials have established the safety, immunogenicity, and the efficacy of the vaccine, concern has been expressed that waning immunity in the vaccine recipients might allow the occurrence of more severe varicella later in life. We show data relevant to this concern on the approximately 20-year follow-up study of the vaccine recipients; this work further extends the experience of a long-term protective efficacy of the vaccine.


Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1454-1457
Author(s):  
Nora Liebers ◽  
Tobias Roider ◽  
Jan-Paul Bohn ◽  
Isabella Haberbosch ◽  
Andreas Pircher ◽  
...  

BioTech ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Vasiliki Mollaki

Organoids hold great promises for numerous applications in biomedicine and biotechnology. Despite its potential in science, organoid technology poses complex ethical challenges that may hinder any future benefits for patients and society. This study aims to analyze the multifaceted ethical issues raised by organoids and recommend measures that must be taken at various levels to ensure the ethical use and application of this technology. Organoid technology raises several serious ethics issues related to the source of stem cells for organoid creation, informed consent and privacy of cell donors, the moral and legal status of organoids, the potential acquisition of human “characteristics or qualities”, use of gene editing, creation of chimeras, organoid transplantation, commercialization and patentability, issues of equity in the resulting treatments, potential misuse and dual use issues and long-term storage in biobanks. Existing guidelines and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to organoids are also discussed. It is concluded that despite the serious ethical challenges posed by organoid use and biobanking, we have a moral obligation to support organoid research and ensure that we do not lose any of the potential benefits that organoids offer. In this direction, a four-step approach is recommended, which includes existing regulations and guidelines, special regulatory provisions that may be needed, public engagement and continuous monitoring of the rapid advancements in the field. This approach may help maximize the biomedical and social benefits of organoid technology and contribute to future governance models in organoid technology.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 194-195
Author(s):  
Kyoichi Tomita ◽  
Haruki Kume ◽  
Keishi Kashibuchi ◽  
Satoru Muto ◽  
Shigeo Horie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document