Large-bore aspiration catheter selection does not influence reperfusion or outcome after manual aspiration thrombectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 637-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Tonetti ◽  
Shashvat M Desai ◽  
Stephanie Casillo ◽  
Benjamin M Zussman ◽  
Merritt W Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Number Of Passes

IntroductionVarious large-bore catheters can be employed for manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT); clinical differences are rarely explored.MethodsProspectively collected demographic, angiographic, and clinical data for patients with acute internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery M1, or basilar occlusions undergoing MAT over 23 months at a comprehensive stroke center were reviewed. We excluded patients in stentriever-based randomized trials/registries. The four most commonly utilized aspiration catheters were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of primary aspiration catheter choice on first-pass success, final reperfusion, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days.ResultsOf 464 large vessel thrombectomies, 180 were performed via MAT on the first pass with one of four catheters. First-pass success was achieved in 42% of cases overall; this rate did not differ significantly between catheters: 50% for Sofia, 45% for CAT6, 40% for 0.072 inch Navien, and 36% for ACE68, p=0.67. Final Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b or 3 reperfusion was achieved in 94% of cases overall: 97% of cases with CAT6, 95% with Sofia, 92% with Navien, and 92% with ACE68, p=0.70. Mean number of passes for index thrombus (2.0 overall), median procedure time (32 min overall), 90-day good outcome (mRS 0–2, mean 36%), and 90-day mortality (mean 27%) did not differ significantly between patients treated with different initial catheters.ConclusionAmong large-bore aspiration catheters, catheter selection is not an independent predictor of first-pass success, final reperfusion, or clinical outcome.

Stentriever salvage after failed manual aspiration thrombectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Tonetti ◽  
Shashvat M Desai ◽  
Stephanie Casillo ◽  
Benjamin M Zussman ◽  
Ashutosh Jadhav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Clot Removal ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Successful Removal ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

IntroductionManual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) and stent retriever mediated aspiration thrombectomy (SMAT) are well described reperfusion strategies for large vessel occlusions. This study aims to identify predictors of successful crossover to SMAT after failed first pass MAT.MethodsProspectively collected data for patients with acute large vessel occlusions undergoing thrombectomy over a 23 month period at a comprehensive stroke center were reviewed. The primary outcome was successful removal of the index clot with resultant Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b or greater reperfusion at any point after a failed initial MAT attempt, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of successful crossover to SMAT.ResultsOf 433 large vessel thrombectomies, 319 underwent first pass MAT, and 113 patients required a repeated pass for the index thrombus. Second pass MAT was performed in 77% of cases and was successful in 54%; second pass SMAT was performed in 23% of cases and was successful in 73% (P=0.11). Third pass MAT was employed in 45% of cases and was successful in 43% while SMAT was performed in 55% of cases and was successful in 77% (P=0.03). Overall, 12% of patients undergoing MAT on the first pass crossed over to successful SMAT. Predictors of successful crossover were internal carotid artery (ICA) location and higher presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score.ConclusionAfter failed first pass MAT, subsequent passes with SMAT had higher rates of successful index clot removal; patients with a higher initial NIHSS score and ICA clot location should be considered for early crossover or even initial SMAT for their clots.

scholarly journals Effect of manual aspiration thrombectomy using large-bore aspiration catheter for acute basilar artery occlusion: comparison with a stent retriever system

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wook Choi ◽  
Miran Han ◽  
Jung Hyun Park ◽  
Woo Sang Jung
Keyword(s):  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
First Line ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
First Pass ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background A large-bore aspiration catheter can be employed for recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion. Here we compare the results of mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever (SR) and manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) using a large-bore aspiration catheter system as a first-line recanalization method in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Methods The records of 50 patients with acute BAO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the first-line recanalization method. The treatment and clinical outcomes were compared. Results Sixteen (32%) patients were treated with MAT with a large-bore aspiration catheter and 34 (68%) with a SR as the first-line treatment method. The MAT group had a shorter procedure time (28 vs. 65 min; p = 0.001), higher rate of first-pass recanalization (68.8% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.044), and lower median number of passes (1 vs 2; p = 0.008) when compared with the SR group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of any hemorrhagic complication (6.3% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.754) between the groups. However, there were four cases of procedure-related subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in the SR group and one death occurred due to massive hemorrhage. Conclusions Selection of MAT using a large-bore aspiration catheter for acute BAO may be a safe and effective first-line treatment method with higher first-pass recanalization rate and shorter procedure time than SR.

Abstract WP26: Use of Balloon-guide Catheter Bridges the Difference in Technical Outcomes Between Adapt and Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke - Insights From STAR Collaboration

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali M Alawieh ◽  
Reda Chalhoub ◽  
Mohammad Anadani ◽  
Maya Eid ◽  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Star Collaboration ◽  
Lower Number ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

Introduction: Recently completed randomized controlled trials comparing aspiration thrombectomy (ADAPT) to stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) demonstrated similar clinical outcomes, but faster thrombectomy procedure time in the ADAPT group. This study evaluates the difference in technical outcomes between ADAPT and SRT combined with balloon-guide catheters (BGC). Methods: Patients undergoing thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke at 12 comprehensive stroke centers in the US and Europe between 01/2013 and 12/2018 were reviewed. Data was collected retrospectively from patient charts, procedure notes, and patient follow-up in neurology clinics. Clinical endpoint was the modified Rankin score (mRS) at 90-days, and technical outcomes were procedure time, total attempts, and mTICI scores. Results: The study included 2,016 patients (mean age 69±15) who underwent stroke thrombectomy using ADAPT (46%), SRT (46%), or SRT+BGC (8%). Similar baseline characteristics were observed between the three groups, and no significant difference in mRS scores at 90-days between the three groups in univariate and multivariate analyses. Thrombectomy performed using SRT+BGC required significantly shorter procedure time compared to SRT (35 vs 61 min, p<0.001) that was comparable to ADAPT (36 min, p>0.1). However, use of SRT+BGC required significantly lower number of aspiration attempts compared to ADAPT (median 1 vs. 2, p<0.05). On multivariate linear regression, use of SRT+BGC independent predicted a significant reduction in procedure time compared to SRT (coefficient=-30.6, p<0.001), and significantly lower number of attempts compared to ADAPT (coefficient=-0.4, p=0.01). SRT+BGC was an independent predictor of higher mortality compared to ADAPT (OR=2.4, p<0.01), despite comparable rates of favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) between the two groups. Use of SRT+BGC was not an independent predictor of symptomatic hemorrhage or complications compared to SRT or ADAPT. Conclusions: This study shows that although ADAPT allows for faster procedure time compared to SRT, the use of BGC in SRT allows for a comparable procedure time to ADAPT with similar overall rates of favorable outcome, complications and hemorrhage. Mortality was higher with the use of BGC compared to ADAPT.

Abstract TP248: Reduced Door-in-Door-Out Time Increases the Likelihood of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Patients

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavit Shah ◽  
Shashvat Desai ◽  
Benjamin Morrow ◽  
Pratit Patel ◽  
Habibullah Ziayee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Rapid Transfer

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is recommended for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting within 24 hours of last seen well (LSW). Unfortunately, patients transferred from spoke hospitals to receive EVT have poorer outcomes compared to those presenting directly to the hub, underscoring the importance of rapid transfer timing - door-in-door-out (DIDO). Methods: Data were analyzed from consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with proximal large vessel occlusions (LVO) transferred to our comprehensive stroke center for EVT. The following variable were studied: DIDO, baseline NIHSS/mRS, presentation CT ASPECTs, site of LVO, treatment, and clinical outcome. Results: Ninety patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery (M1) occlusion at the spoke hospital were included in the study. At the hub hospital, 75% (68) underwent emergent cerebral angiography (DSA) with intent to perform EVT. Reasons for not undergoing angiography at hub hospital included large stroke burden (59%) and improvement in NIHSS score (41%). Overall, DIDO time was 184 (130-285) minutes. Mean DIDO time was significantly lower for patients who underwent DSA at hub hospital compared to patients who did not (207 versus 272 minutes, p=0.031). 92% (12) of patients with DIDO <=120 minutes (n=13) underwent EVT compared to 73% (56) of patients with DIDO >120 minutes (n=77). Every 30-minute delay after 120 minutes lead to a 6% reduction in the likelihood of EVT. Lower DIDO time [OR-0.92 (0.9-0.96), p=0.04] and higher ASPECTS score [OR-1.4 (1.1-1.9), p=0.013] at spoke hospital are predictors of EVT at hub hospital. Conclusion: Reduced DIDO times are associated with higher likelihood of receiving EVT. DIDO should be treated on par as in-hospital time metrics and methods should be in place to optimize transfer times.

Abstract P480: Impact of Intravenous Thrombolysis on Reperfusion Status in Stroke Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio P Carvalho ◽  
Aaron Wessell ◽  
Gregory Cannarsa ◽  
Timothy R Miller ◽  
Dheeraj Gandhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Number Of Passes

Introduction: It remains unclear whether use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) provides additional benefit to patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We sought to determine the impact of IVT on procedure time, number of passes, and successful reperfusion (SR) during MT. Method: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of ELVO stroke at our institution from April 2012 to November 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzes were used to determine independent predictors of poor functional outcome at 90 days,and independent predictors of >2 thrombectomy passes in patients with successful revascularization (SR: TICI 2B, 2C and 3). Results: A total of 400 patients were eligible for analysis. 189 patients received IVT before thrombectomy. Last known well time-to-endovascular therapy was shorter in the IVT group (290.0 min vs 452.75 min; P=<0.001). The IVT group had a trend towards better outcomes at 90 days (mRS 0—2: 44% vs 35%; P=0.076). The number of passes and revascularization status did not significantly differ between IVT and non-IVT patients. The number of patients with any intracranial hemorrhage was higher in the IVT group than non- IVT group [10% vs 4%; p=0.038].Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated ICA occlusion site was an independent predictors of >2 passes relative to M1 occlusion in patients with successful revascularization. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; p<0.001), NIHSS (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17; p<0.001), ≥3 thrombectomy passes (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.23-5.00; p=0.011) and intracranial hemorrhage (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.45-20.84; p=0.012)were independently associated with an increased odds of poor outcome. TICI 2C/3 was associated with reduced odds of poor outcome (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.35; p<0,001). Conclusion: IVT pretreatment did not increase rates of SR and did not shorten MT procedure time nor number of passes needed to achieve SR during MT in our patient population. Randomized controlled trials are required for further evaluation of the impact of IVT on reperfusion status during MT.

Abstract 1122‐000175: Comparison of Transradial Artery Versus Transfemoral Artery Access Mechanical Thrombectomy at a Comprehensive Stroke Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Jimmy Patel ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction : The transradial approach (TRA) is being increasingly adopted by neuro‐interventionists and has emerged as an alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare various time, technical and outcome parameters in patients who undergo MT via TRF vs. TRA approach. Methods : We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MT at a comprehensive stroke center from 7/2016 to 12/2020. We compared patients who underwent MT via TRA vs. TRF with respect to time from angio suite arrival to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from puncture to first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from arrival to the emergency department (ED) to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; the number of passes, rate of switching, achievement of TICI≥2b score, functional independence (3‐month mRS≤2), 3‐month mortality and neurological improvement (improvement in NIHSS by ≥4 points) on day 1 and 3. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, NIHSS, type of anesthesia (general vs. moderate), laterality, and location of clot (internal carotid or middle cerebral artery), ASPECTS≥6, presenting mean arterial pressure, blood glucose, Hb A1C, LDL, intravenous alteplase. Results : 217 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 64.09±14.4 years. 42 (19.35%) patients underwent MT through the TRA approach. There was a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA approach to TRF approach (11.90% vs.2.28%; OR, 105.59; 95% CI,5.71‐1954.67; P 0.002), but no difference in various time, technical and outcome parameters, as shown in the table. Conclusions : Our study demonstrates no significant difference between TRA and TRF approaches with respect to various time, technical and outcome parameters, with a notable exception of a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA to TRF approach.

MRS SOFIA: a multicenter retrospective study for use of Sofia for revascularization of acute ischemic stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017042
Author(s):  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Eytan Raz ◽  
Reade De Leacy ◽  
Dan Meila ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundOver the past several years there has been increased interest in the use of the Sofia aspiration system (MicroVention, Tustin, California) as a primary aspiration catheter.ObjectiveTo perform a multicenter retrospective study examining the efficacy of the Sofia aspiration catheter as a standalone aspiration treatment for large vessel occlusion.MethodsConsecutive cases in which the Sofia catheter was used for aspiration thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) Sofia not used for first pass, and (2) a stent retriever used as an adjunct on the first pass. The primary outcome of the study was first pass recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3). Secondary outcomes included first pass TICI 2b/3, crossover to other thrombectomy devices, number of passes, time from puncture to recanalization, and complications.Results323 patients were included. First pass TICI 2c/3 was achieved in 49.8% of cases (161/323). First pass TICI 2b/3 was achieved in 69.7% (225/323) of cases. 74.8% had TICI 2b/3 with the Sofia alone. Crossover to other thrombectomy devices occurred in 29.1% of cases (94/323). The median number of passes was 1 (IQR=1–3). Median time from puncture to recanalization was 26 min (IQR=17–45). Procedure related complications occurred in 3.1% (10/323) of cases.ConclusionOur study highlights the potential advantage of the Sofia aspiration catheter for primary aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. High rates of first pass recanalization with low crossover rates to other thrombectomy devices were achieved. Median procedure time was low, as were procedural complications.

scholarly journals Impact of balloon guide catheter on technical and clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
M Hassan Murad ◽  
David Fiorella ◽  
Vitor M Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Number Of Passes

Background and purposeFlow arrest with balloon guide catheters (BGCs) is becoming increasingly recognized as critical to optimizing patient outcomes for mechanical thrombectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature for studies that compared angiographic and clinical outcomes for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with and without BGCs.Materials and methodsIn April 2017 a literature search on BGC and mechanical thrombectomy for stroke was performed. All studies included patients treated with and without BGCs using modern techniques (ie, stent retrievers). Using random effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: first-pass recanalization, Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 3 recanalization, TICI 2b/3 recanalization, favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2), mortality, and mean number of passes and procedure time.ResultsFive non-randomized studies of 2022 patients were included (1083 BGC group and 939 non-BGC group). Compared with the non-BGC group, patients treated with BGCs had higher odds of first-pass recanalization (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.55), TICI 3 (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.43 to 3.17), TICI 2b/3 (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.97), and mRS 0–2 (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.22). BGC-treated patients also had lower odds of mortality (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.73) compared with non-BGC patients. The mean number of passes was significantly lower for BGC-treated patients (weighted mean difference −0.34, 95% CI−0.47 to −0.22). Mean procedure time was also significantly shorter for BGC-treated patients (weighted mean difference −7.7 min, 95% CI−9.0to −6.4).ConclusionsNon-randomized studies suggest that BGC use during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is associated with superior clinical and angiographic outcomes. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document