Abstract P480: Impact of Intravenous Thrombolysis on Reperfusion Status in Stroke Thrombectomy
Introduction: It remains unclear whether use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) provides additional benefit to patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We sought to determine the impact of IVT on procedure time, number of passes, and successful reperfusion (SR) during MT. Method: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of ELVO stroke at our institution from April 2012 to November 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzes were used to determine independent predictors of poor functional outcome at 90 days,and independent predictors of >2 thrombectomy passes in patients with successful revascularization (SR: TICI 2B, 2C and 3). Results: A total of 400 patients were eligible for analysis. 189 patients received IVT before thrombectomy. Last known well time-to-endovascular therapy was shorter in the IVT group (290.0 min vs 452.75 min; P=<0.001). The IVT group had a trend towards better outcomes at 90 days (mRS 0—2: 44% vs 35%; P=0.076). The number of passes and revascularization status did not significantly differ between IVT and non-IVT patients. The number of patients with any intracranial hemorrhage was higher in the IVT group than non- IVT group [10% vs 4%; p=0.038].Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated ICA occlusion site was an independent predictors of >2 passes relative to M1 occlusion in patients with successful revascularization. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; p<0.001), NIHSS (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17; p<0.001), ≥3 thrombectomy passes (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.23-5.00; p=0.011) and intracranial hemorrhage (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.45-20.84; p=0.012)were independently associated with an increased odds of poor outcome. TICI 2C/3 was associated with reduced odds of poor outcome (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.35; p<0,001). Conclusion: IVT pretreatment did not increase rates of SR and did not shorten MT procedure time nor number of passes needed to achieve SR during MT in our patient population. Randomized controlled trials are required for further evaluation of the impact of IVT on reperfusion status during MT.