Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with octogenarians

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S Sussman ◽  
Blake Martin ◽  
Michael Mlynash ◽  
Michael P Marks ◽  
David Marcellus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
The Difference

IntroductionMultiple randomized trials have shown that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) leads to improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Elderly patients were poorly represented in these trials, and the efficacy of EVT in nonagenarian patients remains uncertain.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at a single center. Inclusion criteria were: age 80–99, LVO, core infarct <70 mL, and salvageable penumbra. Patients were stratified into octogenarian (80–89) and nonagenarian (90–99) cohorts. The primary outcome was the ordinal score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included dichotomized functional outcome (mRS ≤2 vs mRS ≥3), successful revascularization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and mortality.Results108 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 79 octogenarians (73%) and 29 nonagenarians (27%). Nonagenarians were more likely to be female (86% vs 58%; p<0.01); there were no other differences between groups in terms of demographics, medical comorbidities, or treatment characteristics. Successful revascularization (TICI 2b–3) was achieved in 79% in both cohorts. Median mRS at 90 days was 5 in octogenarians and 6 in nonagenarians (p=0.09). Functional independence (mRS ≤2) at 90 days was achieved in 12.5% and 19.7% of nonagenarians and octogenarians, respectively (p=0.54). Symptomatic ICH occurred in 21.4% and 6.4% (p=0.03), and 90-day mortality rate was 63% and 40.9% (p=0.07) in nonagenarians and octogenarians, respectively.ConclusionsNonagenarians may be at higher risk of symptomatic ICH than octogenarians, despite similar stroke- and treatment-related factors. While there was a trend towards higher mortality and worse functional outcomes in nonagenarians, the difference was not statistically significant in this relatively small retrospective study.

Abstract P488: The Impact of First Pass Effect on Acute Ischemic Stroke Clinical Outcomes: Why We Need to Continue to Improve Mechanical Thrombectomy?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
First Pass ◽  
The Impact

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has significantly improved outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion (mTICI3/2c) with a single pass, was reported to be associated with higher functional independence rates following EVT and has been emphasized as an important procedural target. We compared MT outcomes in patients who achieved FPE to those who did not in a real world large database. Method: A retrospective analysis of LVO pts who underwent MT from a single center prospectively collected database. Patients were stratified into those who achieved FPE and non-FPE. The primary outcome (discharge and 90 day mRS 0-2) and safety (sICH, mortality and neuro-worsening) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 580 pts, 261 (45%) achieved FPE and 319 (55%) were non-FPE. Mean age was (70 vs 71, p=0.051) and mean initial NIHSS (16 vs 17, p=0.23) and IV tPA rates (37% bs 36%, p=0.9) were similar between the two groups. Other baseline characteristics were similar. Non-FPE pts required more stenting (15% vs 25%, p=0.003), and angioplasty (19% vs 29%, p=0.01). The FPE group had significantly more instances of discharge (33% vs 17%, p<0.001), and 90-day mRS score 0-2 (29% vs 20%, p<0.001), respectively. Additionally, the FPE group had a significant lower mean discharge NIHSS score (12 vs 17, p<0.001). FPE group had better safety outcomes with lower mortality (14.2% vs 21.6%, p=0.03), sICH (5.7% vs 13.5, p=0.004), and neurological worsening (71.3% vs 78.4%, p=0.02), compared to the non-FPE group. Conclusion: Patients with first pass complete or near complete reperfusion with MT had higher functional independence rates, reduced mortality, symptomatic hemorrhage and neurological worsening. Improvement in MT devices and techniques is vital to increase first pass effect and improve clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Decision-Making Visual Aids for Late, Imaging-Guided Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-386
Author(s):  
Pouria Moshayedi ◽  
David S. Liebeskind ◽  
Ashutosh Jadhav ◽  
Reza Jahan ◽  
Maarten Lansberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Disability Outcome

Background and Purpose Speedy decision-making is important for optimal outcomes from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Figural decision aids facilitate rapid review of treatment benefits and harms, but have not yet been developed for late-presenting patients selected for EVT based on multimodal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.Methods For combined pooled study-level randomized trial (DAWN and DEFUSE 3) data, as well as each trial singly, 100 person-icon arrays (Kuiper-Marshall personographs) were generated showing beneficial and adverse effects of EVT for patients with AIS and large vessel occlusion using automated (algorithmic) and expert-guided joint outcome table specification.Results Among imaging-selected patients 6 to 24 hours from last known well, for the full 7-category modified Rankin Scale (mRS), EVT had number needed to treat to benefit 1.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9 to 2.1) and number needed to harm 40.0 (IQR, 29.2 to 58.3). Visual displays of treatment effects among 100 patients showed that, with EVT: 52 patients have better disability outcome, including 32 more achieving functional independence (mRS 0 to 2); three patients have worse disability outcome, including one more experiencing severe disability or death (mRS 5 to 6), mediated by symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and infarct in new territory. Similar features were present in person-icon figures based on a 6-level mRS (levels 5 and 6 combined) rather than 7-level mRS, and based on the DAWN trial alone and DEFUSE 3 trial alone.Conclusions Personograph visual decision aids are now available to rapidly educate patients, family, and healthcare providers regarding benefits and risks of EVT for late-presenting, imaging-selected AIS patients.

scholarly journals Endovascular thrombectomy without versus with intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a non-inferiority meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017667
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsien Lin ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Bruce Ovbiagele ◽  
Wen-Yi Huang ◽  
Meng Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis of randomized trials to comprehensively compare the effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus EVT on functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2) after acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO).MethodsWe searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 to February 2021 and abstracts presented at the International Stroke Conference in March 2021 to identify trials comparing EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT in AIS-LVO. Five non-inferiority margins established in the literature were assessed: −15%, −10%, −6.5%, −5%, and −1.3% for the risk difference for functional independence at 90 days.ResultsFour trials met the selection criteria, enrolling 1633 individuals, with 817 participants randomly assigned to EVT alone and 816 to IVT plus EVT. Crude cumulative rates of 90-day functional independence were 46.0% with EVT alone versus 45.5% with IVT plus EVT. Pooled results showed the risk difference of functional independence was 1% (95% CI −4% to 5%) between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT. The lower 95% CI bound of −4% fell within the non-inferiority margins of −15%, −10%, −6.5%, and −5%, but not −1.3%. Pooled results also showed the risk difference between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT was 1% (95% CI −3% to 5%) for mRS 0–1, and 1% (95% CI −1% to 3%) for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that EVT alone is non-inferior to IVT plus EVT for several, but not the most stringent, non-inferiority margins.

Endovascular versus medical therapy for large-vessel anterior occlusive stroke presenting with mild symptoms

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan N Wolman ◽  
David G Marcellus ◽  
Maarten G Lansberg ◽  
Gregory Albers ◽  
Adrien Guenego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background Acute ischemic stroke patients with a large-vessel occlusion but mild symptoms (NIHSS ≤ 6) pose a treatment dilemma between medical management and endovascular thrombectomy. Aims To evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy-eligible patients with target-mismatch perfusion profiles who undergo either medical management or endovascular thrombectomy. Methods Forty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, NIHSS ≤ 6, and a target-mismatch perfusion imaging profile were included. Patients underwent medical management or endovascular thrombectomy following treating neurointerventionalist and neurologist consensus. The primary outcome measure was NIHSS shift. Secondary outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS scores. The primary intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were compared to determine the impact of crossover patient allocation on study outcome measures. Results Forty-seven patients were included. Thirty underwent medical management (64%) and 17 underwent endovascular thrombectomy (36%). Three medical management patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy due to early clinical deterioration. Presentation NIHSS ( P = 0.82), NIHSS shift ( P = 0.62), and 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2; P = 0.25) were similar between groups. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated an increased overall rate of intracranial hemorrhage (35.3% vs. 10.0%; P = 0.04), but symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups ( P = 0.25). In-hospital mortality was similar between groups ( P = 0.46), though all two deaths in the medical management group occurred among crossover patients. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated a longer length of stay (7.6 ± 7.2 vs. 4.3 ± 3.9 days; P = 0.04) and a higher frequency of unfavorable discharge to a skilled-nursing facility ( P = 0.03) rather than home ( P = 0.05). Conclusions Endovascular thrombectomy may pose an unfavorable risk-benefit profile over medical management for endovascular thrombectomy-eligible acute ischemic stroke patients with mild symptoms, which warrants a randomized trial in this subpopulation.

scholarly journals Frontline ADAPT therapy to treat patients with symptomatic M2 and M3 occlusions in acute ischemic stroke: initial experience with the Penumbra ACE and 3MAX reperfusion system

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Altenbernd ◽  
Oliver Kuhnt ◽  
Svenja Hennigs ◽  
Ruediger Hilker ◽  
Christian Loehr
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Distal Vessel

BackgroundAfter a series of positive studies for mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke, the question remains, can symptomatic patients with distal vessel occlusion benefit from mechanical thrombectomy?PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of the 3MAX reperfusion system as frontline therapy for M2 and M3 occlusions.MethodsThis study retrospectively collected data on 58 patients treated for M2 and M3 occlusions between January and September 2016. Of these 58 patients, 31 had an isolated M2 or M3 occlusion. Eligible patients were treated with 3MAX by adirect first pass aspiration (ADAPT) technique within 6 hours following stroke onset. Effectiveness was defined by functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale core 0–2) and revascularization to modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b–3 scores adjudicated by a core laboratory, while complication rates were used to determine safety of the device and the procedure.ResultsPatients with an isolated M2 or M3 occlusion had a mean age of 68.6±13.3 years (range 18–90 years), a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Score of 15 (IQR 9–19), and ASPECTS score of 9 (IQR 8–10). After intervention, 100% (31/31) of patients were revascularized to mTICI 2b–3; 77.4% (24/31) of patients showed revascularization to mTICI 3. Aspiration alone led to revascularization in 83.9% (26/31) of patients. At 90 days, 96.8% (30/31) of patients had achieved functional independence. The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0% (0/31).ConclusionsResults suggest that the 3MAX reperfusion system is safe and effective in achieving successful revascularization and functional independence for patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to M2 and M3 occlusions using ADAPT, either as frontline monotherapy, or in combination with adjunctive devices.

Abstract WMP6: Treatment Effect of 3D Stent Retriever with Aspiration and Aspiration Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Nogueira ◽  
Donald Frei ◽  
Ghita Soulimani ◽  
Sophia S Kuo ◽  
Hope Buell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Scale 8

Introduction: A recent meta-analysis of five stroke endovascular therapy (EVT) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) confirmed EVT’s benefits in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO). Hypothesis: We hypothesize that treatment with the novel 3D Stent Retriever used with the Penumbra System and the Penumbra System alone could confer similar benefits in this stroke cohort. Methods: The Penumbra 3D trial was a RCT to compare the safety and efficacy of the 3D Stent Retriever when used in conjunction with the Penumbra Aspiration System (3D/PS) versus the PS alone. Inclusion criteria for the 3D RCT included presentation within 8 hours of symptom onset, NIH Stroke Scale ≥ 8, and refractory to or not eligible for IV rtPA. Analysis compared 90-day mRS 0-2 vs the EVT RCT meta-analysis reported by the HERMES collaboration (Goyal et al., Lancet 2016). Results: A total of 172 of 198 enrolled patients met analysis criteria. Baseline NIHSS, ASPECTS, and age were similar between the 3D RCT and HERMES control. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) occurred in 74.1% of PS alone (63/85) and 83.9% of 3D/PS (73/87) cases. When both arms were pooled, 79.1% (136/172) of cases achieved successful reperfusion. Results on 90-day functional independence showed both 3D cohorts and the pooled results of the trial had significantly higher rates compared to the HERMES control (IV rtPA). Conclusions: Both the 3D/PS and the PS devices alone showed benefit compared to IV rtPA monotherapy from a recent EVT RCT meta-analysis.

scholarly journals Thrombectomy 24 hours after stroke: beyond DAWN

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1039-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashvat M Desai ◽  
Diogo C Haussen ◽  
Amin Aghaebrahim ◽  
Alhamza R Al-Bayati ◽  
Roberta Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Independence ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Trial Intervention

Background and purposeThe results of the DAWN trial support the benefit of thrombectomy in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute stroke presenting within 6–24 hours from time last known well (TLKW). We sought to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who met DAWN criteria but underwent thrombectomy beyond 24 hours of TLKW.MethodsA retrospective review of endovascular thrombectomy databases at three comprehensive stroke centers was performed to identify all patients who received thrombectomy beyond 24 hours of TLKW and otherwise met the DAWN criteria. Baseline characteristics, efficacy, and safety outcomes were compared with patients in the DAWN trial intervention arm.ResultsTwenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI2b–3: 81% vs 84%, P=0.72), 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2, 43% vs 48%, P=0.68), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5% vs 6%, P=0.87) were comparable across the two groups.ConclusionThrombectomy appears to be safe and feasible in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO meeting all DAWN trial criteria but treated beyond 24 hours of TLKW with outcomes comparable to patients in the DAWN trial intervention arm. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Elisabeth Abramowicz
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Embolism ◽  
Number Of Patients

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is a new and powerful treatment modality that restores functional independence to many victims. Although it has been proved of value in large-vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation, it is also used in basilar artery embolism. Time to successful reperfusion is a major determinant of recovery. A subset of patients has robust collaterals and will benefit from treatment up to 24 hours after stroke onset; the presence of salvageable brain tissue (penumbra) must be ascertained by specialized imaging. The number of patients who can benefit from EVT is estimated at 100,000/year in the United States alone in more than 300 designated Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers. EVT is a new anesthetic emergency. Anesthesiologists must be actively involved in creating protocol-driven care for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management and Prognosis between Multiple Large-Vessel Occlusion and Single Large-Vessel Occlusion: Subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Tandem Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Patient Prognosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document