scholarly journals O-021 Safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization of ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations as a last resort: a prospective single arm study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y He ◽  
W Bai ◽  
T Li ◽  
B Xu
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Transvenous Embolization ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

The transvenous retrograde pressure cooker technique for the curative embolization of high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016566
Author(s):  
Masaomi Koyanagi ◽  
Pascal John Mosimann ◽  
Hannes Nordmeyer ◽  
Markus Heddier ◽  
Juergen Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Transvenous Embolization ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundTransvenous embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be curative. We aimed to evaluate the cure rate and safety of the transvenous retrograde pressure cooker technique (RPCT) using coils and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate as a venous plug.MethodsAll AVM patients treated via transvenous embolization between December 2004 and February 2017 in a single center were extracted from our database. Inclusion criteria were: inability to achieve transarterial cure alone; AVM < 3 cm; and single main draining vein. Outcome measures were immediate and 90 days' angiographic AVM occlusion rate, and morbidity and mortality at 30 days and 12 months, according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score.ResultsFifty-one patients (20 women; median age 47 years) were included. A majority (71%) were high grade (3 to 5 in the Spetzler–Martin classification). AVMs were deeply seated in 30 (59%) and cortical in 21 patients (41%). Thirty-three patients were previously embolized transarterially (65%). All patients but one were cured within a single session with the RPCT (96%). Cure was confirmed on follow-up digital subtraction angiography at 3 months in 82% of patients. Three patients experienced intracranial hemorrhage (6%), one requiring surgical evacuation. There were no deaths. One treatment-related major permanent deficit was observed (2.0%). Mean mRS before treatment, at 30 days, and 12 months after RPCT was 1.5, 1.5, and 1.3, respectively.ConclusionsThe retrograde pressure cooker technique can be curative in carefully selected high-grade AVMs. Long-term follow-up and prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

scholarly journals A New Technique for Transvenous Embolization of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Hybrid Operation

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (24) ◽  
pp. 2993-2996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Ze Wang ◽  
Han-Cheng Qiu ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Yong Cao ◽  
Meng Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Transvenous Embolization ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Hybrid Operation ◽  
A New Technique

Ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations associated with aneurysms: safety and efficacy of selective embolization in the acute phase of hemorrhage

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 763-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Signorelli ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
Isabelle Pelissou-Guyotat ◽  
Jacques Guyotat ◽  
Roberto Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Selective Embolization ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

scholarly journals Transvenous embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations: a review of techniques, indications, and outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
Pedro Norat ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
George A. C. Mendes ◽  
Petr Tvrdik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Transvenous Embolization ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Complete Obliteration ◽  
Transvenous Approach ◽  
Technical Considerations

Endovascular embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is conventionally performed from a transarterial approach. Transarterial AVM embolization can be a standalone treatment or, more commonly, used as a neoadjuvant therapy prior to microsurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery. In contrast to the transarterial approach, curative embolization of AVMs may be more readily achieved from a transvenous approach. Transvenous embolization is considered a salvage therapy in contemporary AVM management. Proposed indications for this approach include a small (diameter < 3 cm) and compact AVM nidus, deep AVM location, hemorrhagic presentation, single draining vein, lack of an accessible arterial pedicle, exclusive arterial supply by perforators, and en passage feeding arteries. Available studies of transvenous AVM embolization in the literature have reported high complete obliteration rates, with reasonably low complication rates. However, evaluating the efficacy and safety of this approach is challenging due to the limited number of published cases. In this review the authors describe the technical considerations, indications, and outcomes of transvenous AVM embolization.

Nidal embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations: rates of cure, partial embolization, and clinical outcome

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Sahlein ◽  
Paloma Mora ◽  
Tibor Becske ◽  
Peter K. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Embolic Agent ◽  
Venous Aneurysm ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Object Nidal embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) has become an increasingly important component of bAVM treatment. However, controversy exists as to the relative efficacy and safety of single-stage versus multistage approaches to bAVM embolization, with recent literature favoring multistage strategies. The authors present a series of consecutive bAVMs embolized at their institution, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a predominantly single-stage embolization strategy. The safety and efficacy of embolization are reported in the context of predetermined treatment strategies to provide more generalizable insight into treatment outcome. Methods One hundred thirty consecutive patients with 131 bAVMs underwent endovascular embolization at a single center. Diagnostic angiography with superselective microcatheterizations was performed in all patients. Postembolization angiograms were reviewed by 3 neuroradiologists for degree of occlusion and angiographic evidence of procedural complications. Patients were divided into cohorts based on the prospectively determined treatment strategy, which included the following: global devascularization of the bAVM (Devasc); targeting of a focal angioarchitectural weakness (Target), typically as an adjunct to surgery or Gamma Knife treatment; and primary occlusion of the bAVM by embolization alone (Occlude). Safety and efficacy were evaluated in the context of these treatment groups. Results The 131 bAVMs were treated over an average of 1.28 embolization sessions per bAVM; 105 bAVMs (80%) were treated in a single stage. The average percentage devascularization in the Devasc arm was 85.3%, which was statistically significantly greater than the 72% aggregate devascularization reported in 8 modern N-butyl cyanoacrylate and Onyx papers based on 1-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum testing (p < 0.001). Focal angioarchitectural weaknesses were successfully embolized for all 24 bAVMs in the Target group, directly with the embolic agent in 23 bAVMs and indirectly in 1 bAVM with a venous aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm by reducing arterial inflow and inducing venous thrombosis. Lesions in all patients in the Occlude arm were 100% occluded with embolization alone. Overall, the bAVMs in the Occlude arm were significantly smaller and required embolization of fewer pedicles than those in the Devasc group. One patient (0.8%) experienced significant morbidity following embolization, and 1 patient in the cohort died (0.8%). Conclusions This research communicates the authors' experience in developing a largely single-stage strategy for embolization of bAVMs. The results suggest that an aggressive, single-stage embolization may be implemented with a margin of safety and effectiveness similar to the multistage approaches more commonly reported in the literature. This work additionally introduces the importance of prospective assignment to a treatment strategy in assessing procedural outcome in bAVM embolization, thereby improving generalizability of the results and allowing for more rigorous interpretation of efficacy and safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document