scholarly journals 370 Title correlates of presenteeism: a study of nurses working in geriatric settings in malta

Author(s):  
L Fiorini ◽  
A Griffiths ◽  
J Houdmont
Keyword(s):  
1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
Duane Lundervold ◽  
Lee Young ◽  
Gordon Bourland ◽  
Thomas Jackson

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Anthony Fiorini ◽  
Amanda Griffiths ◽  
Jonathan Houdmont

Objective: To explore the perceived causes of presenteeism in nurses on geriatric wards.Background: Presenteeism, defined as working when unwell, is associated with lost productivity and increased absenteeism. It is more commonly reported by employees in the healthcare sector than other sectors.Methods: An exploratory, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, thematically analysed. Data collected via 18 recorded interviews with nurses working with patients on geriatric medical wards in Malta.Results: Four major themes emerged that related to nurses’ decisions to engage in presenteeism: illness perceptions, which included participants’ views and experiences of their own health complaints; attitudes to their employing organisation, co-workers and patients; organisational aspects such as culture and administrative arrangements; and personal reasons including illness behaviour preference and personal circumstances.Conclusions: Nurses’ decisions to attend work when unwell were reported as dependent upon four themes. Further studies are warranted to determine if findings are applicable to nurse populations other than those represented in this study.Implications: Workplace health promotion initiatives should target nurses’ management of their own health, particularly if they have chronic illnesses. Workplace policies and arrangements should be examined with a view to controlling presenteeism.


1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 52-52
Author(s):  
Dolores M Alford
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 6079-6084
Author(s):  
Katharigatta N. Venugopala

Identifying the right dose is arguably an essential step in the design of experiments related to drug discovery and development. Often, dose extrapolation is done to scale the doses of a drug from one species to another. However, literature is replete with cases that warrant against the careless and inadequate application of dose-extrapolation methodologies. Increasing costs of research and the development and ethical considerations of experimentation in animals and humans do not condone injudicious design of experiments. This call to caution forms the essential premise of the current review, which focuses on the methodology of the dose extrapolation and its place in early-phase clinical trials and animal studies. Furthermore, the review also provides an update on within-species dose extrapolation to address the issues of adapting adult human doses to pediatric and geriatric settings.


Physiotherapy ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
FA McLeod
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Barry A. Edelstein ◽  
Ronald R. Martin ◽  
Lindsay A. Gerolimatos
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abbas ◽  
Anne Cori ◽  
Samuel Cordey ◽  
Florian Laubscher ◽  
Tomás Robalo Nunes ◽  
...  

Background There is ongoing uncertainty regarding transmission chains and the respective roles of healthcare workers (HCWs) and elderly patients in nosocomial outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV–2) in geriatric settings. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) in four outbreak–affected wards, and all SARS–CoV–2 RT–PCR positive HCWs from a Swiss university–affiliated geriatric acute–care hospital that admitted both Covid–19 and non–Covid–19 patients during the first pandemic wave in Spring 2020. We combined epidemiological and genetic sequencing data using a Bayesian modelling framework, and reconstructed transmission dynamics of SARS–CoV–2 involving patients and HCWs, in order to determine who infected whom. We evaluated general transmission patterns according to type of case (HCWs working in dedicated Covid–19 cohorting wards: HCWcovid; HCWs working in non–Covid–19 wards where outbreaks occurred: HCWoutbreak; patients with nosocomial Covid–19: patientnoso) by deriving the proportion of infections attributed to each type of case across all posterior trees and comparing them to random expectations. Results During the study period (March 1 to May 7, 2020) we included 180 SARS–CoV–2 positive cases: 127 HCWs (91 HCWcovid, 36 HCWoutbreak) and 53 patients. The attack rates ranged from 10–19% for patients, and 21% for HCWs. We estimated that there were 16 importation events (3 patients, 13 HCWs) that jointly led to 16 secondary cases. Most patient–to–patient transmission events involved patients having shared a ward (97.6%, 95% credible interval [CrI] 90.4–100%), in contrast to those having shared a room (44.4%, 95%CrI 27.8–62.5%). Transmission events tended to cluster by type of case: patientnoso were almost twice as likely to be infected by other patientnoso than expected (observed:expected ratio 1.91, 95%CrI 1.08 – 4.00, p = 0.02); similarly, HCWoutbreak were more than twice as likely to be infected by other HCWoutbreak than expected (2.25, 95%CrI 1.00–8.00, p = 0.04). The proportion of infectors of HCWcovid were as expected as random. The proportions of high transmitters (≥2 secondary cases) were significantly higher among HCWoutbreak than patientnoso in the late phases (26.2% vs. 13.4%, p<2.2e–16) of the outbreak. Conclusions Most importation events were linked to HCW. Unexpectedly, transmission between HCWcovid was more limited than transmission between patients and HCWoutbreak. This highlights gaps in infection control and suggests possible areas of improvements to limit the extent of nosocomial transmission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document