S11 Feasibility of a web-based self-management programme, as a ‘bridge’ to starting pulmonary rehabilitation, for individuals hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD)

Author(s):  
L Houchen-Wolloff ◽  
M Orme ◽  
L Clinch ◽  
N Gardiner ◽  
S Singh
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Claire Bourne ◽  
Emma Chaplin ◽  
Stacey Chantrell ◽  
Sally Singh ◽  
Lindsay Apps

Background/Aims The Self-management Programme of Activity Coping and Education (SPACE) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been integrated into an online programme for patients to pursue at home with the support of health care professionals. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in the web-based programme and to guide further development of the website. Methods This nested qualitative study was part of a feasibility study comparing web-based rehabilitation with standard pulmonary rehabilitation. Framework analysis was performed to identify themes. Results Four overarching themes were identified: programme content and reported gains; embedding the programme into daily routines; barriers to participating in the programme; and support. These themes describe benefits of the programme including improved activity levels, exercise intensity and knowledge of the condition, as well as the incorporation of exercise into daily routine. Both completers and non-completers acknowledged the importance of motivation and self-discipline when following the programme and that the flexibility of the programme could help or hinder engagement. Support from healthcare professionals was important and used for encouragement, to obtain health advice and technical support. Conclusions The experiences of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients using this web-based rehabilitation programme illustrate how patients can benefit from such a resource and integrate it into their daily lifestyle.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linzy Houchen-Wolloff ◽  
Mark Orme ◽  
Lisa Clinch ◽  
Emma Chaplin ◽  
Nikki Gardiner ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Hospital admissions due to acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) are costly to the individual and health services. Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is known to reduce hospital readmissions when delivered after hospitalisation but uptake and completion of PR following hospitalisation remains poor (<10% of those eligible in UK audit data). A web-based platform of the SPACE for COPD© self-management programme has previously shown promising results in stable COPD but has not been tested in an acute population. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the web-based programme as a bridge to outpatient PR for individuals hospitalised with an AECOPD. METHODS A non-randomised feasibility study for patients with confirmed AECOPD, deemed web-literate was conducted. All patients were consented during their hospitalisation and received access to the website following discharge (via tablet), in addition to usual care. The programme aims to facilitate patients to better understand and manage their condition through education and home-based exercises. Participants were asked to complete the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ) at baseline and then at home via post at 6-months. 14 participants were also interviewed (n=8 Completers; n= 6 Non-Completers) regarding their participation in the trial and experiences of the web-based programme. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The primary outcome was feasibility of the intervention/ trial (recruitment figures and completion of the BCKQ). Secondary outcomes were: acceptability of the intervention/ trial (qualitative interviews), intervention engagement (web usage statistics), and uptake to outpatient PR at 6-months. RESULTS 2080 patients were screened for eligibility of which 100 patients [mean (SD)71.2 (9.3) years, N(%) 55 (55) male, mean (SD) FEV1/FVC ratio 0.46 (0.14), mean (SD) 50.2 (31.0) pack years, current smokers N (%) 35 (35)] were recruited (4.8% of those screened). The main reason for ineligibility was lack of web-literacy (70%); defined as either not having an email address or not using a computer/ laptop/ smart device ever/ regularly (≤ once a week). N=18 patients (18%) had completed the web programme by 6-months, with others still registered on the programme: N= 27 (27%) and over half not registering: N= 55 (55%). There was a change in BCKQ scores at 6-months of 7.8 points (SD 10.2). Qualitative interviews identified 3 main themes: preparing for, engagement with and benefits of the study/ programme. Of those accepting a referral to PR on discharge (57%), 19% had completed the programme at 6-months. CONCLUSIONS Based on the challenges to recruit, retain and engage participants in the web-based self-management programme, it is not a feasible approach to roll out widely. It appears that the COPD population may not be equipped and ready for digital self-management interventions following an AECOPD. This is particularly important given the drive towards digital interventions post-COVID. This work acknowledges that this is a challenging time for patients with AECOPD to engage with exercise and self-management education. However, for patients able to engage with such an intervention, the completion of PR was double previous audit estimates from the UK, disease knowledge improved and was of value to patients. CLINICALTRIAL Isrctn: 13081008


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e043377
Author(s):  
Kai Zhu ◽  
Jagdeep Gill ◽  
Ashley Kirkham ◽  
Joel Chen ◽  
Amy Ellis ◽  
...  

IntroductionPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) reduces the risk of hospital admissions, and improves physical function and health-related quality of life. However, the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR during the most acute phase of an AECOPD is not well established. This paper describes the protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of inpatient acute care PR during the hospitalisation phase.Methods and analysisMedical literature databases and registries MEDLINE, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, CENTRAL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, WHO trials portal and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for articles from inception to June 2021 using a prespecified search strategy. We will identify randomised controlled trials that have a comparison of in-hospital PR with usual care. PR programmes had to commence during the hospitalisation and include a minimum of two sessions. Title and abstract followed by full-text screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis will be performed if there is sufficient homogeneity across selected studies or groups of studies. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study characteristics framework will be used to standardise the data collection process. The quality of the cumulative evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.Ethics and disseminationAECOPD results in physical limitations which are amenable to PR. This review will assess the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR for AECOPD. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication and at research conferences. Ethical review is not required for this study.


10.2196/18465 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e18465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Begoña Jiménez-Reguera ◽  
Eva Maroto López ◽  
Shane Fitch ◽  
Lourdes Juarros ◽  
Marta Sánchez Cortés ◽  
...  

Background Pulmonary rehabilitation is one of the main interventions to reduce the use of health resources, and it promotes a reduction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs. mHealth systems in COPD aim to improve adherence to maintenance programs after pulmonary rehabilitation by promoting the change in attitude and behavior necessary for patient involvement in the management of the disease. Objective This study aimed to assess the effects of an integrated care plan based on an mHealth web-based platform (HappyAir) on adherence to a 1-year maintenance program applied after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients. Methods COPD patients from three hospitals were randomized to a control group or an intervention group (HappyAir group). Patients from both groups received an 8-week program of pulmonary rehabilitation and educational sessions about their illness. After completion of the process, only the HappyAir group completed an integrated care plan for 10 months, supervised by an mHealth system and therapeutic educator. The control group only underwent the scheduled check-ups. Adherence to the program was rated using a respiratory physiotherapy adherence self-report (CAP FISIO) questionnaire. Other variables analyzed were adherence to physical activity (Morisky-Green Test), quality of life (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, and EuroQOL-5D), exercise capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), and lung function. Results In total, 44 patients were recruited and randomized in the control group (n=24) and HappyAir group (n=20). Eight patients dropped out for various reasons. The CAP FISIO questionnaire results showed an improvement in adherence during follow-up period for the HappyAir group, which was statistically different compared with the control group at 12 months (56.1 [SD 4.0] vs 44.0 [SD 13.6]; P=.004) after pulmonary rehabilitation. Conclusions mHealth systems designed for COPD patients improve adherence to maintenance programs as long as they are accompanied by disease awareness and patient involvement in management. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04479930; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04479930


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document